Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Judicial selection in Michigan

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Judicial selection in Michigan
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Michigan Supreme Court
Method:   Michigan method
Term:   8 years
Michigan Court of Appeals
Method:   Nonpartisan election
Term:   6 years
Michigan Circuit Courts
Method:   Nonpartisan election
Term:   6 years
Michigan District Courts
Method:   Nonpartisan election
Term:   6 years
Michigan Probate Courts
Method:   Nonpartisan election
Term:   6 years


Judicial selection refers to the process used to select judges for courts. At the state level, methods of judicial selection vary substantially in the United States, and in some cases between different court types within a state. There are six primary types of judicial selection: partisan and nonpartisan elections, the Michigan method, assisted appointment, gubernatorial appointment, and legislative elections. To read more about how these selection methods are used across the country, click here.

This article covers how state court judges are selected in Michigan, including:

As of April 2025, the selection of state court judges in Michigan occurred primarily through nonpartisan elections, although supreme court judges were selected through the Michigan method.[1] All judges wishing to serve again must run for re-election at the end of their terms.[2]

Click here to notify us of changes to judicial selection methods in this state.

Michigan Supreme Court

See also: Michigan Supreme Court

The seven justices of the Michigan Supreme Court are chosen by the Michigan method in which a partisan nomination is followed by nonpartisan elections.[2] Incumbent judges seeking re-election may file an affidavit of candidacy requesting to be placed on the ballot, while non-incumbent candidates must either file a nominating petition or obtain a partisan nomination at a party convention. Incumbency is noted on the ballot, though party affiliation is not. Judges serve eight-year terms and must be re-elected if they wish to remain on the court.[3]

Qualifications

To be elected to the supreme court, a judge must:

  • be a qualified elector;
  • be licensed to practice law in the state;
  • have at least five years of law practice experience;
  • be under the age of 70.[3]

Chief justice

The chief justice of the court is elected by his or her fellow justices and serves a two-year term[3]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a temporary replacement to serve until the next general election. At the governor's request, the state bar's standing committee on judicial qualifications interviews, evaluates, and rates all candidates, submitting a confidential report to the governor. However, the governor is not required to request candidates from the committee, nor is the governor bound by the committee's evaluations.[3]

The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.


Michigan Court of Appeals

See also: Michigan Court of Appeals

The judges of the Michigan Court of Appeals are chosen in nonpartisan elections and must face re-election if they wish to remain on the court. Unlike the supreme court, candidates are placed on the ballot via nonpartisan primaries or by nominating petitions. Judges on the appeals court serve six-year terms.[3]

Qualifications

To be elected to the appeals court, a judge must:

  • be a qualified elector of his or her district;
  • be licensed to practice law in the state;
  • have at least five years of law practice experience;
  • be under the age of 70.[3]

Chief judge

The chief judge of the appeals court is selected by supreme court appointment for a term lasting two years.[3]

Vacancies

The process for filling vacancies on the appeals court is identical to that used by the supreme court. With the assistance of the judicial qualifications committee, the governor names a replacement to serve until the next general election.[3]

Michigan Circuit Court

See also: Michigan Circuit Court

The judges of the Michigan Circuit Court are chosen in nonpartisan elections and must face re-election if they wish to remain on the court. Unlike the supreme court, candidates are placed on the ballot via nonpartisan primaries or by nominating petitions. Judges on the circuit court serve six-year terms.[3]

Qualifications

To be elected to the circuit court, a judge must:

  • be a qualified elector of his or her district;
  • be licensed to practice law in the state;
  • have at least five years of law practice experience;
  • be under the age of 70.[3]

Chief justice

The chief judge of each circuit court is selected by supreme court appointment to a term lasting two years.[3]

Vacancies

The process for filling vacancies on the circuit court is identical to that used by the supreme court. With the assistance of the judicial qualifications committee, the governor names a replacement to serve until the next general election.[3]

Limited jurisdiction courts

Michigan has four types of limited jurisdiction court(s): Michigan Court of Claims, Michigan District Courts, Michigan Probate Courts, and Michigan Municipal Courts.

Michigan Court of Claims

The Michigan Court of Claims is composed of four judges of the Court of Appeals from at least two different appellate districts. These judges are assigned by the state Supreme Court.[4]

Michigan District Courts

Judges of the Michigan District Courts are elected through nonpartisan elections and serve six-year terms. Judges must face re-election if they wish to remain on the court.[5]

Michigan Probate Courts

Judges of the Michigan Probate Courts are elected through nonpartisan elections and serve six-year terms. Judges must face re-election if they wish to remain on the court.[5]

Michigan Municipal Courts

Judges of the Michigan Municipal Courts are elected through nonpartisan elections. Judges must face re-election if they wish to remain on the court.[5]

History

Below is a timeline noting changes to judicial selection methods in Michigan, from the most recent to the earliest:

  • 1996: A new constitutional amendment was passed, requiring judges to have at least five years of law practice experience.
  • 1968: The governor's power to fill judicial vacancies was restored. Additionally, incumbency was designated on the ballot for all judges.
  • 1963: A constitutional amendment instated the following changes:
    • The creation of the Michigan Court of Appeals.
    • The filling of judicial vacancies by special election.
    • The selection of the chief justice by the court rather than by voters.
    • Only elected judges were to be designated as incumbents on the ballot.
    • Incumbent judges could bypass the nomination process by filing an affidavit of candidacy.
  • 1939: A constitutional amendment passed, calling for the nonpartisan nomination and election of judges (except for supreme court justices, who continued to be nominated at party conventions).
  • 1908: Under a new law passed by the state legislature, political parties could nominate supreme court candidates at party conventions.
  • 1850: Established that supreme court justices were to be elected by popular vote to eight-year terms. The tenure of circuit court judges was reduced to four years.
  • 1836: Established that supreme court justices were to be appointed by the governor with Senate consent to seven-year terms. Circuit court judges were to be elected by popular vote to four-year terms.[6]

Courts in Michigan

In Michigan, there are two federal district courts, a state supreme court, a state court of appeals, and trial courts with both general and limited jurisdiction. These courts serve different purposes, which are outlined in the sections below.

Click a link for information about that court type.

The image below depicts the flow of cases through Michigan's state court system. Cases typically originate in the trial courts and can be appealed to courts higher up in the system.

The structure of Michigan's state court system.

Selection of federal judges

United States district court judges, who are selected from each state, go through a different selection process from that of state judges.

The district courts are served by Article III federal judges, who are appointed for life during good behavior. They are usually first recommended by senators (or members of the House, occasionally). The President of the United States nominates judges, who must then be confirmed by the United States Senate in accordance with Article III of the United States Constitution.[7]

Selection of Federal Judges Flowchart.png


In other states

Each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they select judges at the state and local level. These methods of selection are:

Election

  • Partisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot alongside a label designating political party affiliation.
  • Nonpartisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot without a label designating party affiliation.
  • Michigan method: State supreme court justices are selected through nonpartisan elections preceded by either partisan primaries or conventions.
  • Retention election: A periodic process whereby voters are asked whether an incumbent judge should remain in office for another term. Judges are not selected for initial terms in office using this election method.

Assisted appointment

  • Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[8] At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types:
    • Bar-controlled commission: Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees that they must choose from.
    • Governor-controlled commission: The governor is responsible for appointing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees they must choose from.
    • Hybrid commission: The judicial nominating commission has no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state bar association. These commissions determine membership in a variety of ways, but no institution or organization has a clear majority control.

Direct appointment

Click a state on the map below to explore judicial selection processes in that state.
http://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_STATE


See also

State courts Appointment methods Election methods
State-Supreme-Courts-Ballotpedia.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Ballotpedia Elections Badge-VOTE.png
State supreme courts
Intermediate appellate courts
Trial courts
Assisted appointment
Court appointment
Gubernatorial appointment
Legislative election
Municipal government selection
Partisan election
Nonpartisan election
Michigan method


External links

Footnotes