Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Julee Flood

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Julee Flood
Image of Julee Flood
North Carolina Court of Appeals Seat 8
Tenure

2023 - Present

Term ends

2031

Years in position

2

Compensation

Base salary

$189,621

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 8, 2022

Contact

Julee Flood (Republican Party) is a judge for Seat 8 of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. She assumed office on January 1, 2023. Her current term ends on January 1, 2031.

Flood (Republican Party) ran for election for the Seat 8 judge of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. She won in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Flood completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Elections

2022

See also: North Carolina intermediate appellate court elections, 2022

General election

General election for North Carolina Court of Appeals Seat 8

Julee Flood defeated Carolyn J. Thompson in the general election for North Carolina Court of Appeals Seat 8 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Julee Flood
Julee Flood (R) Candidate Connection
 
52.4
 
1,956,550
Image of Carolyn J. Thompson
Carolyn J. Thompson (D) Candidate Connection
 
47.6
 
1,775,943

Total votes: 3,732,493
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Carolyn J. Thompson advanced from the Democratic primary for North Carolina Court of Appeals Seat 8.

Republican primary election

The Republican primary election was canceled. Julee Flood advanced from the Republican primary for North Carolina Court of Appeals Seat 8.

Campaign finance

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Julee Flood completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Flood's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

Having researched, analyzed, and written hundreds of judicial opinions for nine appellate jurists, I am uniquely qualified for the North Carolina Court of Appeals. For each case, I seek to apply the law as written in the constitution, statutes, and case precedents: consistency yields fairness and stability. The Court of Appeals would further benefit from my extensive business and education law experience. I have taught in law schools, a paralegal program, and a graduate education program. My legal scholarship includes a book on higher education employment law, a dissertation on law and faculty tenure, and articles on law and policy. Serving my community, I sit on governance support committees for a faith-motivated nonprofit that uses equine therapy and education to help adolescent girls in high-risk situations. I serve my local bar association and mentor those who are new to the legal profession. My husband and I enjoy spending time with our adult sons and their families. If elected I will uphold the state and federal constitutions, apply the rule of law fairly and equally, stand firm against judicial activism, and treat each person with dignity and respect.
  • I have a wealth of legal experience serving nine appellate jurists as a researcher and drafter of hundreds of judicial opinions; teaching in law schools, a paralegal program, and a graduate education program; and serving as founder, in-house counsel, and managing partner for a private sector business. Through such experiences, I remain current in diverse substantive areas of law, and proficient in communication skills. My work in appellate courts has been apolitical; I have served four Democratic jurists and five Republican jurists providing substantive and institutional knowledge. To the Court I bring extensive, proven, unparalleled, unbiased appellate judicial analytical and decision-making expertise.
  • My judicial philosophy is that of textualism: I believe the law says what it means and means what it says—and does not mean what it does not say. I interpret constitutions and statutes by the ordinary meaning of each text. I strive to interpret each document based on its original language, trying to discern what the original meaning of the text was, based on how the words used would have been used and understood by a reasonable person at the time. My judicial philosophy furthers predictability and stability in the law and aligns with the North Carolina Judicial Branch Mission to “protect and preserve the rights and liberties of all the people as guaranteed by the Constitutions and laws of the United States and North Carolina[.]”
  • When analyzing cases, I am rigorous in discerning fine, technical distinctions. I adhere to stare decisis—the doctrine of honoring precedent. I respect Madisonian principles of the separation of powers and believe the role of a judge is to decide cases based on the facts and the law. I oppose judicial activism. And I believe that each case, for the people involved, is the most important case. To each person, I offer the dignity and respect they deserve.
Grounded in my desire to advance and serve a fair and just legal system and my desire not to recuse myself on any issue that could arise before the Court, I decline to address any policy-related passion. This honors the constitutional principle of the separation of powers and the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes