June 8, 2010 election results
From Ballotpedia
![]() |
U.S. Congress |
---|
State executive officials |
State legislatures |
Elections |
Arkansas
Secretary of State
2010 Race for Attorney General - Democratic Primary Runoff[1] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
62.3% | |||
Mark Wilcox (D) | 37.4% | |||
Total votes | 225,242 |
California
- See also: June 8, 2010 election in California
Attorney General
2010 Race for Attorney General - Democratic Primary[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
33.1% | |||
Chris Kelly (D) | 15.9% | |||
Alberto Torrico (D) | 14.9% | |||
Ted Lieu (D) | 10.5% | |||
Rocky Delgadillo (D) | 10.1% | |||
Pedro Nava (D) | 9.9% | |||
Mike Schmier (D) | 5.6% | |||
Total votes | 1,676,360 |
2010 Race for Secretary of State - Republican Primary[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
47.3% | |||
John Eastman (R) | 34.2% | |||
Tom Harman (R) | 18.5% | |||
Total votes | 1,555,709 |
Ballot measures
Statewide propositions
- See also: California 2010 ballot propositions
June 8:
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
LRCA | Proposition 13 | Taxes | Exempts construction to seismically retrofit buildings from property tax reassessment | ![]() |
LRCA | Proposition 14 | Elections | Adopts a two-two primary system | ![]() |
LRSS | Proposition 15 | Elections | Repeals the state ban on public funding of campaigns; creates a program to publicly fund Secretary of State campaigns for the 2014 and 2018 elections; creates a biennial fee of $700 on lobbyists, lobbying firms, and lobbyist employers | ![]() |
CICA | Proposition 16 | Elections | Prohibits a local government from incurring any debt or expending public funds to expand electricity delivery services and prohibits local governments from becoming an aggregate electricity provider without a two-thirds supermajority vote of approval from voters in the local government's jurisdiction and voters within the territory that would be served | ![]() |
CISS | Proposition 17 | Regulation | Allows car insurance companies to decrease or increase rates based on a driver's history of continuous car insurance coverage | ![]() |
November 2:
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
CISS | Proposition 19 | Marijuana | Legalizes recreational marijuana for individuals 21 years of age and older; requires marijuana establishments to pay federal, state, and local taxes that are currently assessed on other similar businesses; allows state and local governments to impose additional taxes and fees | ![]() |
CICA | Proposition 20 | Elections | Transfers the power of congressional redistricting from the California State Legislature and the governor to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, which was created by Proposition 11 of 2008 | ![]() |
CISS | Proposition 21 | Taxes | Creates an $18 surcharge to vehicle registration fees and dedicating revenue from the surcharge to state parks and wildlife programs | ![]() |
CICA | Proposition 22 | State spending | Prohibits the state from redirecting property tax revenues from local jurisdictions and using fuel tax revenue to pay for transportation bonds, even in the case of a fiscal emergency | ![]() |
CISS | Proposition 23 | Environment | Suspends Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), which required greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020, until California's unemployment rate decreases to 5.5% or less for four consecutive quarters | ![]() |
CISS | Proposition 24 | Taxes | Repeals 2008 and 2009 tax laws that allowed corporations to lower their tax liability through transferring operating losses to prior years, sharing tax credits among affiliated corporations, and changing the tax calculation for multi-state businesses | ![]() |
CICA | Proposition 25 | State spending | Changes the requirement to pass the state budget from two-thirds to a simple majority vote of the legislature and requiring legislators to forfeit pay when they do not pass a state budget on time | ![]() |
CICA | Proposition 26 | Taxes | Increases the vote requirement needed to impose certain new taxes and fees by the state legislature and local governments from a simple majority to a two-thirds supermajority vote | ![]() |
CICA/SS | Proposition 27 | Elections | Repeals a 2008 ballot measure that established a citizens commission for legislative redistricting and returning the power of redistricting to the state legislature | ![]() |
Secretary of State
2010 Race for Secretary of State - Republican Primary[3] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
74.3% | |||
Orly Taitz (R) | 25.7% | |||
Total votes | 1,447,827 |
Iowa
Secretary of State
- See also: Iowa Secretary of State election, 2010
2010 Race for Secretary of State - Republican Primary[4] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
47.0% | |||
George Eichhorn (R) | 26.9% | |||
Chris Sanger (R) | 26.1% | |||
Total votes | 164,073 |
Nevada
Attorney General
- See also: Nevada Attorney General election, 2010
2010 Race for Attorney General - Republican Primary[5] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
44.4% | |||
Jacob Hafter (R) | 34.2% | |||
None of these candidates | 21.4% | |||
Total votes | 157,119 |
South Carolina
Attorney General
2010 Race for Attorney General - Republican Primary[6] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | Percentage | |||
![]() |
39.0%[7] | |||
William Leighton Lord, III (R) | 37.1% | |||
Robert Bolchoz (R) | 23.9% | |||
Total votes | 385,312 |
Footnotes
- ↑ Arkansas Secretary of State - 2010 Democratic Primary Runoff Election Results
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 California Secretary of State - 2010 Statewide Primary Election Results
- ↑ California Secretary of State - 2010 Statewide Primary Election Results (dead link)
- ↑ Iowa Secretary of State - 2010 Primary Election Results
- ↑ Associated Press - Nevada Attorney General Primary Election Results
- ↑ South Carolina State Election Commission - 2010 Republican and Democratic Primary Election Results
- ↑ Even though Michael Alan Wilson received the most votes, he failed to receive over fifty percent of those votes required by South Carolina state law. A runoff election between the top two vote recipients, therefore, was required to decide who went on to the general election.