Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
KEITH HAYWOOD v. CURTIS DROWN, et al. (2009)

![]() |
KEITH HAYWOOD v. CURTIS DROWN, et al. |
---|
Term: 2008 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 3, 2008 |
Decided: May 26, 2009 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
KEITH HAYWOOD v. CURTIS DROWN, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 26, 2009. The case was argued before the court on December 3, 2008.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New York State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - liability, civil rights acts (cf. liability, governmental and liability, nongovernmental; cruel and unusual punishment, non-death penalty)
- Petitioner: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Respondent state: New York
- Citation: 556 U.S. 729
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes