Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al. (1957)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1956 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: January 14, 1957 |
| Decided: May 6, 1957 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 5-3 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • Harold Burton • William Douglas • Earl Warren |
| Dissenting |
| Tom Clark • Felix Frankfurter • John Harlan II |
KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 6, 1957. The case was argued before the court on January 14, 1957.
In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California State Supreme Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Attorneys - Admission to a state or federal bar, disbarment, and attorney discipline (cf. loyalty oath: bar applicants)
- Petitioner: Attorney, or person acting as such;includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 353 U.S. 252
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Hugo Black
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
