Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

KREIGH v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & COMPANY (1909)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
KREIGH v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & COMPANY
Term: 1908
Important Dates
Argued: April 27, 1909
Decided: May 24, 1909
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
David Josiah BrewerWilliam Rufus DayMelville Weston FullerJohn Marshall HarlanOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaWilliam Henry MoodyRufus Wheeler PeckhamEdward Douglass White

KREIGH v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 24, 1909. The case was argued before the court on April 27, 1909.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Kansas U.S. Circuit for the District of Kansas.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - comity primarily removal cases, civil procedure (cf. comity, criminal and First Amendment); deference to foreign judicial tribunals
  • Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 214 U.S. 249
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rufus Day

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes