Kalamazoo, Michigan, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (November 2023)
Kalamazoo Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Local charter amendments and Local elections and campaigns |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiative |
|
Kalamazoo Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative was on the ballot as an initiative in Kalamazoo on November 7, 2023. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported enacting ranked-choice voting for municipal elections in Kalamazoo if authorized by state law. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting ranked-choice voting for municipal elections in Kalamazoo if Michigan state law is changed to allow local ranked-choice voting. |
Election results
Kalamazoo Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
6,486 | 70.97% | |||
No | 2,653 | 29.03% |
Measure design
The initiative was designed to enact ranked-choice voting for municipal elections in Kalamazoo if state law is changed to allow local ranked-choice voting.[1]
If state law is changed to allow ranked-choice voting, the initiative provides the following process for ranked-choice voting in Kalamazoo:[1]
For mayor, voters would rank their candidates in order of preference. If one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, they would be declared the winner. If no candidates received more than 50%, the candidate with the least amount of votes would be eliminated and votes for that candidate redistributed to voters' second choice. This process would repeat until one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote.
For electing the three commissioners, voters would rank candidates by preference. A formula sets the number of votes (called the election threshold under the initiative) a candidate needs to win. If a candidate gets more votes than the threshold, they win. Extra votes they get beyond the threshold would be distributed to voters' second-choice candidates. If the redistributed votes push two more candidates to the threshold, the three commissioner positions would be considered elected. If only two positions are filled, then the extra votes of the second winner would be given to voters' third-choice candidates.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative was as follows:
“ | Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that the Mayor and City Commission members are to be elected by a Ranked Choice Voting method when it is authorized by State Law? | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Support
Supporters
Officials
- Kalamazoo City Commissioner Chris Praedel (D)
Organizations
Arguments
Opposition
Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.
Background
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures | |
---|---|
Pages: • Ranked-choice voting (RCV) • History of RCV ballot measures • Electoral systems on the ballot • Local electoral systems on the ballot • Electoral systems by state |
- See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.
Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.
RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.
Local RCV ballot measures
Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.
- Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
- There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
- The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
- The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.
The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.
Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025 | |||||
Topic | Total | Approved | Approved (%) | Defeated | Defeated (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adopt RCV | 72 | 57 | 79.2% | 15 | 20.08% |
Repeal RCV | 8 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 50.0% |
Total | 80 | 61 | 76.3% | 19 | 23.7% |
Proportional representation measure, 1918
In 1918, voters in Kalamazoo approved a charter amendment, by a vote of 78% in favor and 22% opposed, adopting a system of proportional representation for the seven-member Kalamazoo City Council. In Wattles v. Upjohn, on September 30, 1920, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the system of proportional representation, the Hare System, adopted in Kalamazoo "[abridged] the right of elective franchise."[2]
Path to the ballot
This measure was put on the ballot through an initiative petition sponsored by Rank MI Vote. To qualify for the ballot, 2,745 valid signatures were required by May 24, 2023. On June 22, 2023, the city clerk found that proponents submitted 3,018 valid signatures, and ordered the measure to be placed on the November 2023 ballot.[3]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Michigan
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Michigan.
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 [https://civicclerk.blob.core.windows.net/stream/KALAMAZOOMI/af9ed76d-cc15-41ef-8e13-9d775303e48a.pdf?sv=2022-11-02&st=2023-08-14T00%3A09%3A13Z&se=2024-08-14T00%3A14%3A13Z&sr=b&sp=r&sig=%2F%2FvE9fprXidzdRlekgLgcufhTY5sxAB5wPfWmuYPxrs%3D City of Kalamazoo, "Resolution Setting the Election Date and Determining the Ballot Language for a Charter Amendment to Allow for Ranked Choice Voting for City Elected Offices," August 7, 2023]
- ↑ Michigan Supreme Court, "Wattles v. Upjohn," September 30, 1920
- ↑ Kalamazoo City Clerk', "Certification of Initatory Petition," accessed August 22, 2023
- ↑ Michigan Secretary of State, "Frequently Asked Questions: Elections and Voting," accessed April 16, 2023
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Michigan Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed October 7, 2024
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 26, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Michigan.gov, "Notice to Voters: Voter Identification Requirement in Effect," accessed October 7, 2024
|