Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Kathryn Nance
Kathryn Nance was a 2016 Republican candidate who sought election to the U.S. House to represent the 9th Congressional District of California.[1]
Elections
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Democratic. Incumbent Jerry McNerney (D) defeated Antonio Amador (R) in the general election on November 8, 2016. McNerney and Amador defeated Kathryn Nance (R) and Alex Appleby (L) in the top-two primary on June 7, 2016.[2][3]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
57.4% | 133,163 | |
Republican | Antonio Amador | 42.6% | 98,992 | |
Total Votes | 232,155 | |||
Source: California Secretary of State |
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic |
![]() |
55.3% | 71,634 | |
Republican | ![]() |
21.7% | 28,161 | |
Republican | Kathryn Nance | 19.1% | 24,783 | |
Libertarian | Alex Appleby | 3.9% | 5,029 | |
Total Votes | 129,607 | |||
Source: California Secretary of State |
Campaign themes
2016
The following issues were listed on Nances' campaign website. For a full list of campaign themes, click here.
“ |
|
” |
—Kathryn Nance's campaign website, http://www.nance2016.com/ |
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Kathryn Nance California Congress. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
- United States House of Representatives
- California's 9th Congressional District election, 2016
- California's 9th Congressional District
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Kathryn Nance for Congress, "Home," accessed November 24, 2015
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Certified List of Candidates for Voter-Nominated Offices June 7, 2016, Presidential Primary Election," accessed April 4, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "California Primary Results," June 7, 2016
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.