Kathy Gill (Snohomish County Charter Review Commissioner Board Council District 3, Washington, candidate 2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

Special state legislative • Appellate courts • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • All local elections by county • How to run for office
Flag of Washington.png


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Kathy Gill
Candidate, Snohomish County Charter Review Commissioner Board Council District 3
Elections and appointments
Last election
November 4, 2025
Education
Bachelor's
University of Georgia
Graduate
Virginia Tech
Personal
Religion
Non-practicing
Profession
Communications
Contact

Kathy Gill ran for election to the Snohomish County Charter Review Commissioner Board Council District 3 in Washington. She was on the ballot in the general election on November 4, 2025.[source]

Gill completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.

[1]

Biography

Kathy Gill provided the following biographical information via Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey on October 6, 2025:

  • Birth place: Albany, GA, Georgia
  • Associate: Abraham Baldwin Agriculture College
  • Bachelor's: University of Georgia
  • Graduate: Virginia Tech
  • Gender: Female
  • Religion: Non-practicing
  • Profession: Communications
  • Incumbent officeholder: No
  • Campaign slogan: Experience Counts.
  • Campaign website
  • Campaign endorsements
  • Campaign Facebook

Elections

General election

General election for Snohomish County Charter Review Commissioner Board Council District 3

The following candidates ran in the general election for Snohomish County Charter Review Commissioner Board Council District 3 on November 4, 2025.

Candidate
Janelle Cass (Nonpartisan)
Alicia Crank (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
Patrick Decker (Nonpartisan)
Image of Kathy Gill
Kathy Gill (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
Selena Killin (Nonpartisan)
Aurora Lehr (Nonpartisan)
Carol McMahon (Nonpartisan)
Colin McMahon (Nonpartisan)
Mpiima Mugambe (Nonpartisan)
David Preston (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Election results

Endorsements

To view Gill's endorsements as published by their campaign, click here. Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Gill in this election.

Campaign themes

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Kathy Gill completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Gill's responses.

Expand all | Collapse all

Every 10 years, Snohomish County voters elect three nonpartisan commissioners from each county council district to serve as the Charter Review Commission. I am a passionate educator dedicated to shaping a fair and understanding community and ensuring that our charter (constitution) reflects community growth and values.

I have the needed skills to represent you on the Commission, such as effective listening (we hold public hearings), synthesizing information (public comments and Commission research) and communicating technical information in lay person terms (our recommendations will appear on the 2026 November ballot).

My work experience crosses government, academia and industry. In each role, my goal was to ensure that customer (student) concerns were integrated into organization processes and communication. I will do the same with the Commission.

I am running because I want to use my skills to continue making SnoCo a thriving, vibrant, diverse community where everyone’s voice is heard. I hope you visit my website to learn more and consider voting for me in November.
  • Enhancing voter effectiveness, such as ranked choice voting
  • Limiting local and county office holders to one position at a time
  • Promoting sustainable growth while expanding affordable housing
Enhancing voter effectiveness and ensuring all have a voice and are heard
In Washington state politics, I look up to former Gov. Christine Gregoire. I worked with her in the 1990s when she was the head of the Department of Ecology. She convened a Water Resources Forum composed of squabbling groups of citizen groups and charged us with crafting experimental projects to resolve a massive water rights application backlog. Her leadership, trust that the squabbles could be transformed to cooperation, and perseverance (it took three years) remains an inspiration. Moreover, she persisted! She became state attorney general and then governor.
Transparency, an open mind, truthfulness and a commitment to represent the entire community.
Charter Review Commissioners need to be skilled in listening to diverse voices, both in public hearings and public comment. They need to be able to balance competing points of view and chart a path that benefits the community as a whole. The Charter needs to be viewed as a living document that changes to reflect a growing and diverse community.

Commissioners also need to study how other local governments -- not just in Washington -- have approached similar challenges, such as expanding affordable housing. That issue is much bigger than a single county can resolve. By acting collectively, progress will happen. I am a pragmatic optimist who understands that sometimes change happens incrementally. The Charter should make such opportunities clear and possible.
After graduate school (Virginia Tech, master of science in agricultural economics), I worked for the Virginia Water Resources Research Center. I analyzed data related to the then-fledgling federal flood insurance program and completed a status report to fulfill grant requirements. Congress passed the flood insurance program because of the paucity of private flood insurance plans. Congress also hoped to reduce the cost of disaster payments after floods.

I worked for the Center for two years, then moved to Pennsylvania to manage communications for a regional dairy cooperative (not unlike Darigold in the Pacific Northwest). Most of my career can be broadly described as public service.
As a professor, I initially struggled with understanding that my courses might not be the most important thing in a student's life! I loved the subjects and wanted my students to do so also. Maybe a class was required, and they were in my classroom not of their free will. Also, unlike my life as an undergrad, many (most?) of my students had a job or were entering the university several years after high school. I had a far greater mix of international students than I experienced as an undergrad. Student challenges of balancing "life" with "school" required that I focus on empathy, patience and understanding. I'm still in touch with students from the 2000s, suggesting that I may have been successful as I focused on personal growth and student needs.
Fair Vote, Washington; 32nd District Democrats; Cindy Black; Dale Hartman; Margaret Achterman; Michael and Michele Miller.
For 20+ years, I taught newbies how to ride motorcycles in the state basic motorcycle rider course. In doing so, I like to think that I've helped reduce the number of motorcycle crashes and fatalities in Washington.

I also served as a role model for the women who took the class, since most riders (and instructors) are male. I had only one incident where a student required that I call 9-1-1 ... and my first aid skills were accessible when needed.

I finished my tenure as the chair of the state motorcycle safety advisory board to the Department of Licensing. There, the board and I succeeded in convincing the legislature to expand the size of our board and focus on ensuring that board members represented both eastern and western Washington.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Other survey responses

Ballotpedia identified the following surveys, interviews, and questionnaires Gill completed for other organizations. If you are aware of a link that should be added, email us.

See also


External links

Footnotes