Kathy Seeley

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Kathy Seeley

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Montana 1st Judicial District Court
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education

Bachelor's

Carroll College, 1980

Law

University of Montana School of Law, 1983


Kathy Seeley is a district court judge for the 1st District Court in Montana.[1] She joined the court in 2008 to replace Judge Thomas Honzel and was retained by voters in 2014, winning a six-year term that expires on December 31, 2020.[2] [3]

Elections

2014

Seeley was retained to the 1st District Court with 85.3 percent of the vote on November 4, 2014.She ran unopposed in the primary on June 3, 2014.[4] 

Education

Seeley earned her undergraduate degree in business and finance from Carroll College in 1980. She received her J.D. from the University of Montana School of Law in 1983.[2]

Career

Prior to joining the bench in 2008, Seeley worked as an attorney, an assistant Montana attorney general and a prosecutor for the Prosecution Services Bureau.[2]

Noteworthy cases

Rikki Held, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.

On August 14, 2023, Seeley ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Rikki Held, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.

Under a provision of the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), state agencies were restricted from factoring in greenhouse gas emissions or climate change when issuing permits for energy projects that required environmental reviews.[5] In 2020, a group of young climate activists filed a lawsuit claiming the restrictions violated Article IX of the state's constitution, which says that the "state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations."[6][7]

In her ruling, Seeley wrote that "Montana's emissions and climate change have been proven to be a substantial factor in causing climate impacts to Montana's environment and harm and injury" and enjoined the MEPA provision, ruling it unconstitutional. [7]

The office for Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen (R) announced in September 2023 that the state will appeal Seeley's ruling.[8]

Dismissing Gov. Schweitzer's suit

In late 2010, Judge Kathy Seeley dismissed a lawsuit Gov. Brian Schweitzer filed against the legislature in September of that year. Schweitzer claimed a bill, HP 676, passed in 2009 was unconstitutional because it "limited his veto power."[9] Judge Seeley said: "While (the governor) alleges that the Legislature’s actions in passing HB 676 (in 2009) ‘limited’ his veto power, and his brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss asserts that his ‘constitutional veto power was essentially nullified’ and ‘effectively invalidated’ by the Legislature’s actions, the fact is that his veto power was never in jeopardy. Instead, he chose not to exercise it and not to sign the bill, both of which were legitimate options."[9]

See also

External links

Footnotes