Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Kelly Brown (Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Kelly Brown

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Candidate, U.S. House Wisconsin District 6

Elections and appointments
Next election

November 3, 2026

Education

High school

Randolph High School

Associate

Moraine Park Technical College, 2018

Personal
Birthplace
Madison, Wis.
Religion
Spiritual
Profession
Agriculture
Contact

Kelly Brown (Democratic Party) is running for election to the U.S. House to represent Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District. Brown declared candidacy for the 2026 election.[source]

Brown completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.

Elections

2026

See also: Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District election, 2026

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 6

The following candidates are running in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 6 on November 3, 2026.


Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Kelly Brown completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Brown's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am a disabled person who works in agriculture, quality control, and logistics, with experience in healthcare, animal care, telecommunications, and public service. I was born in Madison and raised on a dairy goat farm in Randolph, Wisconsin, where I learned the values of hard work, compassion, and responsibility. I’m autistic, non-binary, and the first openly transgender person to run for Congress in Wisconsin’s 6th District.

My career includes work in memory care, tech support, veterinary clinics, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. I am also a dog trainer and Reiki practitioner, combining animal science with holistic care. I have volunteered with LGBTQ+ ally groups, disability advocacy efforts, suicide prevention, and mental health mentoring. I currently mentor others through the Eating Disorder Foundation.

I hold a Health Information Technology degree from Moraine Park Technical College and am completing a bachelor’s degree in Leadership and Personalized Studies at UW–Parkside. I plan to continue on to a master’s program. I am a single parent and the child of a disabled vet. I’ve survived long COVID, medical trauma, poverty, and the opioid-related death of my son’s father. These experiences shape my commitment to compassionate, community-rooted policymaking.
  • I bring firsthand experience with the systems Congress debates and leadership experience working to improve them. I’ve navigated disability, long COVID, housing insecurity, and the opioid crisis as a working parent. These challenges shape my understanding of healthcare, economic justice, and mental health policy. I’ve held leadership roles in 4-H, student government, and service organizations, including Vice President of my college’s student senate and Publications Chair for Circle K. I’ve also advocated for accessibility and equity on campus. I don’t just understand where systems fail. I’ve worked to make them better.
  • Rural communities deserve more than survival, they deserve real investment and opportunity. I was raised on a dairy goat farm in rural Wisconsin and still live in a small town today. I’ve seen how underinvestment in healthcare, infrastructure, and housing harms rural families. My platform prioritizes support for family farms, rural healthcare access, reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights, clean energy, childcare availability, and affordable public transit between rural hubs. Strong local economies create stability statewide. Expanding rural broadband ensures no community is left behind.
  • Everyone deserves the freedom to live fully, with dignity, safety, and care. My platform is built on the belief that people should be free to work, love, and thrive, as long as they cause no harm to others, to animals, or to the planet. That means protecting civil rights, defending bodily autonomy, investing in community care, and holding systems accountable to the people they serve. From healthcare and environmental protection to labor rights and public safety, I’m focused on policies rooted in responsibility, compassion, and collective well-being.
I am passionate about healthcare access, disability rights, rural revitalization, mental health care, and compassionate drug policy. As someone living with chronic illness, I’ve experienced the gaps in our healthcare system. I’ve also seen how underinvestment affects rural communities, especially in housing, childcare, and public transit. I support protecting civil rights, supporting family farms, expanding access to addiction treatment and mental health care, and ensuring people with disabilities can live with autonomy and dignity.
As a child, I looked up to my dad. He was disabled and in pain for as long as I can remember, but he worked hard and could build or fix anything. He was a jack of all trades and mastered every skill he tried. But as I got older, I began to understand that much of what I saw as strength was actually survival. He never gave himself rest or grace. He stayed busy to avoid facing what hurt. I still love him, but I no longer see that version of strength as the one I want to model.

Today, the person I look up to most is my therapist, Sam. This July marks six years since I decided to give therapy another chance. In that first session, something shifted. Over many sessions, learned that I didn’t have borderline personality disorder. I had complex PTSD. I was also AuDHD. And over the years, I came to understand that I had been living with an eating disorder as well. None of that healing happened overnight, but Sam stayed with me through every step.

She saw me through the darkest part of my life. After surviving the ICU with COVID, I lost my federal health insurance. Sam could not take my Medicaid HMO at the time, but she saw me three times a week due to increase suicidal ideations and never sent a bill. Even now, with private insurance, she still waives co-pays because she knows I cannot afford them. I have never once felt like a burden.

Because of her, I have faith in people again. I believe healing is possible. I believe showing up for each other matters. And I believe that grace, consistency, and compassion are forms of strength worth following.
My recommendations aren’t your typical political picks. I believe everyone should have the chance to become the best version of themselves, and that starts with healing, self-awareness, and listening to voices that are too often left out. My political philosophy is rooted in justice, care, accountability, and the belief that we build better systems when we understand the harm we've internalized and the history we were never taught.

Books that reflect this include:

The Body Is Not an Apology by Sonya Renee Taylor

Untamed by Glennon Doyle

Radical Acceptance by Tara Brach

Hood Feminism by Mikki Kendall

Medical Apartheid by Harriet A. Washington

Fat and Queer edited by Bruce Owen, Miguel M. Morales, and Tiff Joshua TJ Ferentini

You Have the Right to Remain Fat by Virgie Tovar

Fearing the Black Body by Sabrina Strings

Anti-Diet by Christy Harrison

Women Like Us by Erica Abeel

Atlas of the Heart by Brené Brown

The Explosive Child by Dr. Ross W. Greene

White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo


These books explore the intersections of race, disability, gender, body autonomy, trauma, and how systems shape our lives. They’ve helped me unlearn shame, name injustice, and imagine new possibilities, both personally and politically. They reflect my belief that policy should be built by people who’ve had to survive what others only debate.
An elected official should be someone who listens first and speaks with intention. Too often, people in power are more focused on keeping their position than earning it. I believe leadership is about service, not status. That means being honest, transparent, and willing to admit when you don’t know something. It also means taking responsibility when you get it wrong, and doing the work to make it right.

I’ve spent my life listening to people who are often overlooked, in food service lines, hospital waiting rooms, homeless shelters, memory care wings, and in barns. I’ve sat beside people in grief, in crisis, and in recovery. I’ve heard the stories that never make it into legislation. That has taught me that compassion is not weakness, it’s the foundation of good governance.

I believe elected officials should understand the systems they’re shaping. Lived experience matters. So does humility. I’ve lived through housing insecurity, disability, medical trauma, and the loss of a loved one to overdose. I’ve also served in student leadership, volunteered through 4-H and community programs, and worked jobs where precision and accountability were non-negotiable. That combination, of showing up in hard times and stepping up when leadership was needed, shaped who I am.

The best elected officials don’t pretend to have all the answers. They surround themselves with people who challenge them, they ask hard questions, and they stay grounded in the lives of the people they serve. The most important principles to me are integrity, accountability, humility, compassion, and a deep commitment to justice, not just legal justice, but economic, medical, social, and environmental justice too.
I am not running for office because I think I am special. I am running because I know what it feels like to be left behind, and I believe people deserve representation that sees them, hears them, and tells the truth. I bring lived experience, deep empathy, and a long history of showing up even when it is hard, even when no one is watching.

I grew up on a dairy goat farm where I learned responsibility early. By five years old, I was feeding baby goats. By eight, I had started my first business. I have worked in veterinary clinics, memory care, customer service, tech, agriculture, and the VA. I have mucked stalls in subzero weather, managed lab logistics, and sat with grieving families during euthanasia appointments. I have also survived long COVID, medical trauma, poverty, and the loss of my son’s father to the opioid crisis. My strength does not come from theory. It comes from living what others only debate.

I am calm under pressure, deeply pragmatic, and able to find clarity in chaos. Whether serving in student government or organizing in my community, I have learned how to listen to people who disagree, hold space for hard conversations, and make decisions based on care and accountability. I have learned how to advocate, not just for myself, but for people who are rarely given a seat at the table.

I believe in transparency, shared responsibility, and building systems that work for everyone, not just those with power or privilege. I do not claim to have all the answers, but I bring honesty, resilience, and a willingness to do the work. I have spent my life learning how to survive. Now, I want to help others do more than survive. I want to help us all build something better, together.
The core responsibility of a member of the U.S. House of Representatives is to serve the people of their district, not just those with the most power, wealth, or access, but everyone, especially those who are most often ignored. That means listening deeply, showing up consistently, and taking the time to understand how federal policy touches people’s lives on the ground. It also means communicating clearly and often, being transparent about decisions, and remaining accessible and accountable between elections, not just during campaign season.

It’s not enough to vote the right way. Elected officials should use their position to advocate, educate, and organize. That includes building coalitions, pushing for oversight when systems fail, and lifting up stories from their district that aren’t being heard. It means asking hard questions in committee meetings, drafting legislation that reflects lived experience, and resisting the temptation to perform for cameras while avoiding the actual work.

A representative’s job is also to act as a bridge, between local concerns and federal action, between people and government, and sometimes between conflicting priorities that all need attention. They should fight for resources that benefit their district while upholding the broader responsibilities of national service, justice, and constitutional duty.

As someone who has relied on public services, stood in long lines at underfunded clinics, and helped others navigate systems that were not built for them, I believe one of the most important roles of a representative is to center the experiences of those who are too often left out. Policy should be rooted in real life, not just party lines or polling data. Representatives should meet people where they are, not expect them to come polished and perfect to be worthy of help.

Above all, the role demands courage, humility, and follow-through. People don’t need saviors, they need someone who will listen, show up, and fight.
They tried.

They prevailed.
They lifted others.
Everyone won.

If I could be remembered for anything, I want it to be that I never stopped trying, not when it was hard, not when it hurt, and not when it felt like I was the only one standing. I want to be remembered as someone who refused to give up, who carried others when they were tired, and who never mistook power for purpose.

I want my legacy to be about showing up for people who were told they didn’t belong. Disabled people. Queer people. Poor people. Survivors. People from rural towns who felt forgotten. People who were always told they were too much, too complicated, or not worth the investment.

I want to help build a world where no one has to earn dignity with their suffering. Where compassion is the default, not the exception. Where we choose care, truth, and justice, not just because it is strategic, but because it is right.

If my work makes it easier for the next person to rise, then I have done something worth remembering. I do not need statues or stages. I just want to leave behind systems that hurt fewer people and lift more of us up.

That is the legacy I hope to leave.
The first historical event I remember is September 11, 2001. I was in 7th grade and had just finished clarinet lessons when one of our classmates' parents came rushing down the hallway. We had strong winds the night before, and she was picking up her son to help clean up their silo that was blown over. As she passed by, she said something about a plane hitting a tower. I was confused at first, thinking a plane had crashed into something on their property.

That confusion quickly turned to fear. When I entered my classroom, all eyes were glued to the television. Just moments later, we watched live as the second plane hit the second tower. Everything stopped. All classes were canceled. The entire school sat together, watching and praying. We felt helpless as we watched our country come under attack.

Until that moment, I didn’t think something like that could happen here. It changed the way I understood the world. It was the first time I saw that even in a small rural town, far from New York City or Washington, we were connected to a much bigger world. That day shaped how I see crisis, how I interpret fear, and how I understand the responsibility of leadership during uncertain times.
If we are talking technically, my first job started when I was five years old. I was responsible for feeding the baby goats on our family’s dairy goat farm, earning twenty dollars a week. That early experience taught me that real responsibility means showing up, even when it is hard or inconvenient. The animals depended on me, and I never forgot that.

My first official W-2 job was at age fifteen, working as an animal care-taker and veterinary assistant at Columbus Countryside Veterinary Clinic. I stayed there for six years. I helped with kennel cleaning, surgical recovery, inventory, and vet tech support. Over time, I was trusted with more sensitive roles, especially around euthanasia care. I was often asked to be present during euthanasias at the clinic and was honored to be invited along on home visits as well.

I never saw it as a burden. I’ve always felt called to help animals pass as peacefully and comfortably as possible. I tried to be a calm presence for both the animals and their families. It was sacred work to me; the kind of work you carry with you long after the shift ends.

That job taught me how to lead with quiet care, how to hold space for grief, and how to show up for others when they are hurting. Whether I was cleaning up after surgery, helping a scared dog settle in, or supporting someone through their last goodbye, I learned that real service often happens in the background. It shaped the kind of person I strive to be: steady, compassionate, and grounded in care.
One of my favorite books is The Body Is Not an Apology by Sonya Renee Taylor. It was the first book that gave me permission to stop treating my body like a problem to fix. As someone who is disabled, neurodivergent, and in recovery from an eating disorder, I had internalized a lot of shame. This book helped me begin unlearning that.

Taylor writes about radical self-love not as a feel-good slogan, but as a deep act of resistance in a world that profits off of our self-hatred. She connects the way we treat ourselves to the systems we participate in, and shows how healing personally and dismantling injustice are part of the same work. That framework changed how I view politics, activism, disability, and even community care.

It is not a book about perfection. It is a book about returning to ourselves, choosing to stay in our bodies, and refusing to apologize for existing in a way the world doesn't always know how to hold. It helped me see that justice must include our relationship with ourselves, and that liberation starts at home.
I would probably choose Luna Lovegood from the Harry Potter series. She is eccentric, brilliant in ways most people overlook, and completely unapologetic about who she is. People underestimate her constantly, and she never lets it change her. She leads with empathy, loyalty, and a deep understanding of people that goes far beyond what others give her credit for.

Luna reminds me that it is okay to be different, to think differently, and to hold space for things that do not always make sense to others. She believes in people. She is kind without being naive, and strong without needing to dominate. That balance, staying soft while still standing firm, is something I strive for in my own life.

Also, as someone who is neurodivergent and spent a long time feeling out of place, I relate to Luna’s quiet confidence. She exists fully in her own truth, and she finds her people not by changing herself, but by staying true to who she is.
Honestly? “Purple Pills” by D12. It has nothing to do with the lyrics, it’s the beat. That song has been stuck in my head more than any other, and for a good reason. Music is one of the ways I regulate my body and focus. As someone who is autistic and has ADHD, stimming through music helps me concentrate and feel grounded. Certain beats just click with my brain and body, and “Purple Pills” is one of them. It is actually the number one song that makes stimming feel physically good.

Eminem has been a significant part of my life in general. Even the tattoo on my back has a connection to him. I don’t always relate to the words, but the rhythm, pacing, and emotional intensity in his music have helped me stay centered during times when my mind was going a hundred directions at once.

Beats by artists like Eminem, Halsey, and Taylor Swift help me stay focused and emotionally regulated. Whether I am driving, working, or just trying to reset between tasks, music like that helps me move through the world with more ease. It’s not just background noise for me, it is a form of support and expression. And sometimes, it just makes me smile to have a chaotic song like “Purple Pills” playing in the back of my mind while I’m doing something serious.
My own mind.

I have lived most of my life navigating complex PTSD, undiagnosed autism, ADHD, and dyscalculia. For years, I internalized the struggle. I thought I was lazy, inconsistent, or too sensitive. I was told to try harder, stop overthinking, or grow up. I believed it. I learned to mask just to survive, but I did not understand why everything felt harder for me than it seemed to be for everyone else.

It took my freshman year in college for my chemistry professor to notice I might have dyscalculia. I got tested, she was right. It was not until I was 30 that I realized I am autistic and have ADHD. Everything started to make sense, the sensory overwhelm, the executive function challenges, the emotional intensity, the way I could hyperfocus one minute and shut down the next.

Once I finally got the right diagnosis and support, I was able to access the medication I needed. I was prescribed ADHD medication and, for the first time, began to reduce my anxiety and depression meds. I started feeling more regulated and less like I was constantly failing at being human.

The hardest part was not the neurodivergence itself. It was the shame that built up over years of being misunderstood. The missed opportunities. The pain of not being believed. Of being labeled too much, too emotional, or too broken. I carried that weight for decades.

Therapy helped me unlearn a lot of that. I began to understand that I was not broken. I was adapting. I was surviving. And I was doing the best I could with the information and tools I had. I still have hard days, but now I know what I am working with. My mind may still be complicated, but I have learned how to work with it instead of against it. That shift saved my life.
The U.S. House of Representatives is unique because it is the chamber most directly connected to the people. Its members represent smaller districts, are elected every two years, and are meant to stay closely accountable to the communities they serve. That structure creates an opportunity for the House to reflect the changing needs, voices, and values of the country in real time.

Unlike the Senate, which was designed for longer terms and slower deliberation, the House was built for responsiveness. That can be a strength when it means uplifting local concerns, passing timely legislation, and responding to urgent needs. It can also create challenges when short-term political pressure overrides long-term solutions. But at its best, the House is where real people can be heard and where constituent concerns have a direct path to federal policy.

The House holds the power of the purse, meaning it plays a central role in federal budget decisions. Where and how we invest our national resources reflects what we value. That makes the House critical in shaping programs that affect healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public safety.

Because it has more members than any other federal body, the House also has the potential to be the most diverse. It can serve as a space where people from different backgrounds and lived experiences bring forward ideas that would otherwise be left out. As our country continues to grow and change, the House can lead by modeling inclusion, accessibility, and public accountability.

What makes the House truly unique is its potential to be the people’s chamber in both structure and spirit. The closer it gets to that vision, the better it serves all of us.
Experience in government or politics can be helpful, but it is not the only kind of experience that matters. Lived experience, especially from those who have been directly impacted by policy decisions, is just as important. We need leaders who understand what it feels like to be on the receiving end of systems that are confusing, underfunded, or unfair.

I often think about how different our laws might look if politicians could only earn what the lowest-paid person affected by their votes is paid. In the United States, disabled people can still legally be paid less than minimum wage. There are people working full time who still cannot afford housing, healthcare, or childcare. These are the people most affected by policy, and too often, they are left out of political conversations entirely.

I have experience in service leadership, student government, healthcare, agriculture, animal care, and veterans’ support. I’ve also raised a child as a disabled single parent while navigating housing insecurity and chronic illness. I have worked on the ground in broken systems and seen how decisions made in Washington play out in real life.

What matters most is not whether someone has held office before. It is whether they are willing to listen, to learn, and to serve with humility and integrity. Government works best when it includes people who have had to survive what others only study. I believe that kind of experience is not just valuable. It is necessary.
One of the greatest challenges we face in the next decade is rebuilding unity across lines that have been used to divide us. Political polarization, growing inequality, and social fragmentation have made it harder for people to see each other as neighbors. I believe our biggest challenge is helping people remember that all people are people, and that none of us can do this alone. We need each other. Always have.

There is a common phrase about pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, but the original meaning of that saying was that it is impossible. No one makes it entirely on their own. Every person who has ever succeeded had help, whether from a parent, a teacher, a government program, a union, or a community. The myth of total independence isolates us. The truth is we are all interdependent, and there is strength in that.

We need to reconnect the working class and build solidarity across race, class, gender, geography, and disability. The issues we face — economic inequality, climate change, housing instability, rising healthcare costs, and the mental health and addiction crisis, cannot be solved in isolation or competition. They require collective effort, shared responsibility, and leadership rooted in care.

We also face serious threats to democracy, including disinformation, extremism, and voter suppression. If we want a future where people feel safe, heard, and supported, we must recommit to public trust, truth, and participation. That starts by remembering our shared humanity and showing up for each other.
Two years is both a strength and a challenge. On one hand, it keeps representatives directly accountable to the people they serve. It allows voters to respond quickly if their needs are not being met or if leadership is out of step with the district. That closeness to the public is part of what makes the House unique and important.

On the other hand, the constant campaign cycle can make it difficult for representatives to focus on long-term solutions. Too much time is spent fundraising, defending seats, and reacting to political pressure instead of doing the work. The short term can discourage bold policymaking, especially when representatives worry that taking a stand might cost them re-election before they even finish what they started.

I understand the value of accountability. I also understand how exhausting it is to live in survival mode, always looking over your shoulder and unsure if your efforts will be enough. That is how many Americans live every day, especially those facing poverty, illness, or discrimination. It is also how many representatives feel under this structure. The pressure is nonstop.

Rather than changing the term length, I believe we need to change the systems that make short terms so disruptive. That includes campaign finance reform, public financing options, and limiting the influence of corporate donors and lobbyists. When representatives can focus more on their communities and less on fundraising, the two-year cycle becomes less of a burden and more of a tool for public accountability.

The problem is not the number of years. It is the culture and structure that surrounds the role. Fix that, and the two-year term can do what it was meant to do, keep representatives close to the people.
I believe term limits can be a useful tool, but they are not a complete solution to the deeper issues of power, access, and accountability in government. Simply rotating people through office doesn’t guarantee better representation. In some cases, term limits can actually weaken institutional memory and give more influence to unelected lobbyists and staffers. But when elected officials stay in office for decades without meaningful connection to their communities, the system becomes stagnant and less responsive.

The real issue isn’t always how long someone serves. It’s who has access to run and who gets the resources to win. We need to reduce barriers to entry for working-class, disabled, LGBTQ+, and BIPOC candidates. Campaign finance reform, voter protections, and stronger public ethics laws are essential whether or not term limits are in place.

That said, I do support reasonable term limits for certain federal offices if they are paired with policies that ensure continuity and fair representation. No one should treat public office like a personal entitlement. Officials should have to earn continued trust through transparency, accessibility, and results — not just name recognition.

I also support limiting the power of committee chair positions and leadership roles to ensure new voices can be heard and one person doesn't hold too much influence. We should be fostering a culture of mentorship, accountability, and service grounded in the needs of the people — not personal gain.

At the end of the day, the system should work for the people, not just the people who know how to work the system.
There is no single representative I want to model myself after, but I deeply respect those who lead with authenticity, courage, and a strong connection to the people they serve. I want to speak with the clarity and power of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, think on my feet with the sharpness and wit of Jasmine Crockett, and carry the courage and grace of Sarah McBride.

Sarah McBride’s leadership as the first openly transgender state senator in the country has opened doors for so many of us. She leads with heart, policy knowledge, and a steady moral compass. Jasmine Crockett brings fierce intelligence, a deep understanding of the law, and a quick mind that holds power to account in real time. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez leads from her lived experience as a working-class woman of color, and she shows what it looks like to stay grounded and principled under constant scrutiny.

I also admire people like Barbara Lee, who had the conviction to stand alone when it mattered most, and Ayanna Pressley, who leads with transparency and makes space for conversations around disability, mental health, and systemic inequality. I respect Katie Porter for breaking down complex systems in a way that serves the public, not just political insiders.

Most of all, I want to be the kind of representative who stays accountable to the people who sent me. I do not want to copy anyone’s path. I want to lead with the same integrity, fire, and deep sense of responsibility I have carried through every stage of my life, and use that to build a government that reflects all of us.
I’ve heard many stories that stay with me, but the ones that leave the deepest impact are the ones where someone did everything they could and still fell through every crack. One story I carry with me came from a young man I met outside a fast food restaurant on a freezing night.

He asked for a ride to another restaurant that stayed open 24 hours. The one we were at was closing, and he had nowhere to go. I couldn’t offer a ride. My car was full of medical supplies from picking up my mom after surgery. But I sat with him and listened. He had come to the U.S. from Africa to live with his father. After a fight, his father kicked him out, and he was completely alone.

I spent nearly an hour calling shelters and outreach programs. No one had space. No one answered. He was not a criminal or a threat. He was just someone who needed warmth and safety. I still think about him and hope someone else was able to help him that night.

More than anything, I think about the fact that his story had to exist at all. In a just society, no one should have to earn help by how sad or persuasive their story is. No one should have to justify their need for shelter, food, or dignity. We are told to be moved by stories like his, and we should be. But what we should really be asking is why anyone has to suffer to be seen as worthy of care.

Every story like his reflects a larger failure. I do not believe people are broken. I believe our systems are. And I believe we owe each other more than temporary sympathy. We owe each other justice, safety, and care, no matter who we are or what we have been through.
Dad jokes are the bomb, especially Midwest dad jokes!!

Why did the chicken cross the road?

To prove to the raccoon that it could done.
Yes, I believe compromise has a place in policymaking, but it should never come at the cost of someone’s dignity, safety, or rights. The question should not be whether we help people. It should be how. For example, the debate should not be whether we house the houseless, it should be which policy will help the most people most effectively. That is where compromise belongs. Not in deciding who deserves care, but in finding the best way to deliver it.

Too often, compromise has meant watering down justice or delaying necessary action. I do not believe we should compromise on civil rights, bodily autonomy, or access to healthcare. But I do believe in working with people who may have different views, as long as the goal remains to improve people’s lives. Finding common ground is possible when we agree that all people deserve to be safe, fed, housed, and heard.

I have seen how policies shaped without lived experience at the table can fail the very people they claim to help. That is why compromise must be paired with representation, transparency, and accountability. If you are not talking to the people affected by a policy, you should not be deciding the terms of their survival.

Compromise can be a tool for good when it brings diverse voices together to solve problems. But it is only meaningful if everyone involved has power in the conversation. I will work across differences, but I will never support any deal that sacrifices basic humanity for political convenience.
The House’s power to originate revenue bills is more than a technical rule. It is a reflection of our national values. How we raise and spend money determines who we serve, what we prioritize, and whether we repair harm or continue to ignore it.

I would use this power to fight for a fair tax system where corporations and the ultra-wealthy pay their share, and working families are no longer carrying the burden. Closing tax loopholes, taxing extreme wealth, and ending corporate welfare would create the funding we need for real investments in people.

That includes universal healthcare, rural infrastructure, housing, clean energy, public transit, mental health care, and disability services. But it also includes repair. I support Black reparations and land return initiatives led by Indigenous communities. Justice is not radical. It is overdue.

Every revenue bill is a moral decision. I would work to ensure those decisions reflect compassion, equity, and accountability. I want to see more transparency in how those bills are written and more input from people who are often shut out of the conversation.

I do not think about revenue in abstract numbers. I think about people rationing medication, skipping meals, or living one car repair away from crisis. Our tax and spending systems should serve them, not just the wealthy and well connected.
The House should use its investigative powers to serve the public, not to score political points. Oversight is not just a tool. It is a responsibility. It should be used to expose corruption, prevent abuse of power, protect civil rights, and hold both government agencies and corporations accountable when they harm people or violate the public trust.

That includes investigating failures in healthcare access, veterans' services, disability programs, environmental protections, labor conditions, and public spending. These powers should be used to uncover where systems are falling short, not just when they become a crisis. Investigations can lead to reforms that protect lives, ensure funding is used effectively, and strengthen public faith in government.

The House also has a duty to examine how federal resources are distributed. That means asking whether policies and programs are reaching the people they were designed to help, including rural residents, disabled individuals, and low-income or historically marginalized communities. If funding is only helping those with privilege or access, then the system is not working as it should.

I also believe the House must take disinformation, voter suppression, and threats to democratic institutions seriously. When trust in democracy is weakened, oversight becomes one of the few tools left to rebuild it. But it only works if it is used with integrity and purpose.

Oversight should be fact-based, people-centered, and focused on long-term change. It should not be used to distract, delay, or punish. I believe the House should use its investigative powers to center truth, protect the vulnerable, and hold systems to the standards the public deserves.
Dina Nina Martinez-Rutherford-District 15 alder for the City of Madison
Committees that align with my lived experience and policy priorities include the House Committee on Agriculture, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and Committee on Education and the Workforce. I am also interested in the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, especially in areas related to disability access, healthcare systems, and public infrastructure.

As someone who lives in a rural farming community and works in agriculture and logistics, the Agriculture Committee would allow me to advocate for family farms, food access, clean water, and rural investment. The Energy and Commerce Committee covers issues that directly affect my life and district, including healthcare policy, broadband access, environmental protection, and disability rights.

The Veterans' Affairs Committee is especially important to me. I come from a multi-generational military family. My father was a disabled Vietnam veteran who struggled to receive care and support through the VA. I have worked within the VA system and understand both its potential and its serious limitations. I want to help ensure that veterans receive real, timely, and accessible care.

I am also passionate about workforce and education policy. That includes expanding vocational training, increasing support for disabled workers, and protecting the rights of working people. Having navigated higher education over many years while working and parenting, I want to make education and training more accessible for nontraditional students, caregivers, and disabled learners.

Oversight matters because I believe government should be accountable, transparent, and actively responsive to the people it serves. Committees are where the real work happens, and that is where I want to be.
I believe financial transparency and government accountability are essential to a functioning democracy. Public money should serve the public good, and people deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, without having to dig through red tape or decipher complex jargon to get the truth. Budgets are moral documents, and they should reflect the values and priorities of the people, not the interests of lobbyists or corporations.

Accountability also means ensuring elected officials and public agencies are held to the same, or higher, standards as the people they serve. That includes enforcing conflict-of-interest policies, limiting corporate influence, and making sure reporting systems are accessible to the public. No one should be immune from scrutiny just because they have a title or political connections.

I support stronger protections for whistleblowers, publicly available budget breakdowns, and campaign finance reform that reduces the role of dark money in politics. I also believe in building tools and systems that make it easier for everyday people to understand and engage with how decisions are made, especially those who have been historically excluded from the process.

As someone who has had to fight for basic services, I know what it feels like to be ignored by systems that were never designed for people like me. Accountability shouldn't be something we beg for. It should be built in. Trust in government can only be rebuilt when transparency and responsiveness are not optional, they’re expected.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Kelly Brown campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2026* U.S. House Wisconsin District 6Candidacy Declared general$0 N/A**
Grand total$0 N/A**
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete
** Data on expenditures is not available for this election cycle
Note: Totals above reflect only available data.

See also


External links

Footnotes


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
Tony Wied (R)
Republican Party (7)
Democratic Party (3)