Kenneth DeGraaf
Kenneth DeGraaf (Republican Party) is a member of the Colorado House of Representatives, representing District 22. He assumed office on January 9, 2023. His current term ends on January 12, 2027.
DeGraaf (Republican Party) is running for re-election to the Colorado House of Representatives to represent District 22. He declared candidacy for the Republican primary scheduled on June 30, 2026.[source]
Biography
Kenneth DeGraaf was born in Michigan. He served in the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve, and U.S. Air National Guard from 1986 to 2017. DeGraaf earned a degree in aerospace structures from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1990 and a master's degree in structural dynamics from Columbia University in 1991. His career experience includes working as a commercial aviator, an advanced calculus and powered flight teacher with the U.S. Air Force Academy, an environmental manager, and a flight safety officer.[1][2]
Sponsored legislation
The following table lists bills this person sponsored as a legislator, according to BillTrack50 and sorted by action history. Bills are sorted by the date of their last action. The following list may not be comprehensive. To see all bills this legislator sponsored, click on the legislator's name in the title of the table.
Committee assignments
2025-2026
DeGraaf was assigned to the following committees:
2023-2024
DeGraaf was assigned to the following committees:
Elections
2026
See also: Colorado House of Representatives elections, 2026
General election
The primary will occur on June 30, 2026. The general election will occur on November 3, 2026. General election candidates will be added here following the primary.
Democratic primary
Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Michael Pierson (D) is running in the Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 30, 2026.
Candidate | ||
| | Michael Pierson ![]() | |
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary
Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Incumbent Kenneth DeGraaf (R) is running in the Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 30, 2026.
Candidate | ||
| | Kenneth DeGraaf | |
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Endorsements
Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.
2024
See also: Colorado House of Representatives elections, 2024
General election
General election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Incumbent Kenneth DeGraaf defeated Michael Pierson and Daniel Campaña in the general election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Kenneth DeGraaf (R) ![]() | 56.6 | 25,890 | |
Michael Pierson (D) ![]() | 38.6 | 17,665 | ||
Daniel Campaña (Unaffiliated) ![]() | 4.7 | 2,170 | ||
| Total votes: 45,725 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Daniel Schinsky (L)
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Michael Pierson advanced from the Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 25, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Michael Pierson ![]() | 100.0 | 4,635 | |
| Total votes: 4,635 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Incumbent Kenneth DeGraaf advanced from the Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 25, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Kenneth DeGraaf ![]() | 100.0 | 9,538 | |
| Total votes: 9,538 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for DeGraaf in this election.
2022
See also: Colorado House of Representatives elections, 2022
General election
General election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Kenneth DeGraaf defeated Blake Garner and Michael Giallombardo in the general election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Kenneth DeGraaf (R) | 57.7 | 20,763 | |
Blake Garner (D) ![]() | 39.1 | 14,080 | ||
| Michael Giallombardo (L) | 3.2 | 1,167 | ||
| Total votes: 36,010 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Blake Garner advanced from the Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 28, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Blake Garner ![]() | 100.0 | 5,512 | |
| Total votes: 5,512 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22
Kenneth DeGraaf advanced from the Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 28, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Kenneth DeGraaf | 100.0 | 11,302 | |
| Total votes: 11,302 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Campaign themes
2026
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Kenneth DeGraaf has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are Kenneth DeGraaf, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.
Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?
Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for. More than 26,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.
Help improve Ballotpedia - send us candidate contact info.
2024
Kenneth DeGraaf completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by DeGraaf's responses.
| Collapse all
- Our Declaration of Independence was and remains revolutionary in recognizing that our Rights are Creator-endowed and therefore unalienable, not subject to the benevolence of government. My job as a representative is to ensure that the government is doing its job of safeguarding those Rights, while ensuring the government does not itself violate them. Unfortunately, the leftist majority has little interest in safeguarding and has little problem violating your Rights. Too many "legislators" seek their value in passing bills for the taxpayers to pay, yet few people see the value in the addition of over 600 each year to the over 165,000 already on the books and to a budget of over $40billion plus unfunded mandates.
- The Rights of Life, Liberty and Property are individual Rights superseding government. Government is for the collective protection and promotion of those Rights. It is not moral for an individual to violate the Rights of another, likewise it is not moral for government to violate individual Rights for its own benefit or for the benefit of others. The difference between a Republic and a Democracy is that a Republic will protect the individual from the mob; a Democracy will feed him to it.
- Government is seen as the "easy button" for top-down problem solving. Unfortunately, there's no problem the government can't make worse with a "solution," and in doing so take more than any benefit returned, with the solution to bad legislation being more legislation and more spending. In an attempt to ameliorate centralized corruption and inefficiency committees are formed instead of allowing the issue to be solved at the appropriate level. This will continue unless people return to the values that intend them to be free, not industrial tax-widgets laboring under "good intentions" of bureaucrats.
HB24-1246 to preserve hydrocarbons for energy redundancy and ensure protection of grid infrastructure.
HB23-1044 States create and budget for State laws; the feds should enforce federal laws.
HB24-1023 to ensure no deprivation of property without due process of the law.
HB24-1145&1279 would improve election security while saving taxpayer money and allow them to personally audit that their ballot was counted correctly.
As a USAFA Distinguished Graduate and Guggenheim Fellow, I have the intellectual proficiency to work through the twisted logic of legislation to work out the actual intent behind the normally deceptive title.
As an aviator I have demonstrated the ability to learn the both the machine and the mission for which it is purposed. Military aviation teaches you to think clearly in a stressful situation and the emergent situations that tend to arise not only validate performance under pressure but put other life events into a more manageable perspective. Military briefings are an interesting phenomenon, parsing through HUD footage frame by frame to extract every insight possible from a critical five seconds on the Range.
As an Environmental Manager I have worked first-hand with various regulatory agencies and was able to create mutually beneficial synergies. Several projects like an Explosive Site Plan, Hot Pit Refueling, becoming Michigan's first military "Clean Corporate Citizen", or reactivating a military range had no prescribed path forward and required a new one to be created but within regulatory compliance.
Establishing a multi-airframe training detachment in the New Mexico desert required working across the Active Duty, Air National Guard, and AF Reserves and mostly to instill the confidence in someone to relocate hundreds of miles. I was later told that this project was considered doomed from the start, but it is still in operation.
Then I worked in the Catalog department at JCPenny.
Mario’s killer was charged merely with “unlawful termination of a pregnancy”, a class-5 felony, instead of “murder.” In a dearth of humanity, HB13-1154 had stripped Mario of his personhood. The law states, “Nothing…shall be construed to confer the status of ‘person’ upon a human embryo, fetus, or unborn child at any stage of development prior to live birth.” HB22-1279 took that further, and not only removed any rights of personhood but even any mention of the humanity of an unborn human for the purpose of enabling fetal harvesting. The law specifically denies 5th & 14th amendment protections, stating ”a fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have independent or derivative rights under the laws of the state” and the law authorizes extermination via “ANY MEDICAL PROCEDURE, (any) INSTRUMENT, (any) AGENT, OR (any) DRUG.” Here in this law, the word “any” has a broad range, including crushing, dismemberment, chemical burning, suffocation and exsanguination.
Global CO2 generation in the extraction of its stored solar energy is about 35billion tons, of which the USA generates about 5, of which 0.140billion tons are resultant from Coloradans. But this is in relation to the over 3200billion tons in the atmosphere. CO2 itself contributes less than 20% to atmospheric energy by absorbing some of the low-energy long-wave infrared radiation emanating from earth’s average temperature of about 60F. We cannot escape the incessant drumbeat of the pending doom of the planet increasing by 1.5C above the pre-industrial ice-age.
This means that on average a US Citizen contributes (20%(5/3200)/300million =) 1-trillionth of the planet’s atmospheric energy--the equivalent of 1-drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools full of drops. Applied to 8billion people, that would be 8-thousandths, and 8/1000’s of the foretold 1.5C “tipping point” would be 0.01C, but to achieve even 95% of NetZero is estimated to cost over $12,000 per person per year. That’d be over $96,000,000,000,000 per year to achieve a 0.01C reduction. Or, we could use that $96 trillion and adapt.
“Civics, Military & Veterans Affairs” was the “kill committee” for Republican bills before the Democrat super-majority granted them the ability to kill any bill promoting individual Liberty, and to raplidly pass their tax & shackle bills out of committee and to the House floor with minimal scrutiny. While the varied ideas are interesting, they are largely outside the purview of good governance. Most impose costly, unaccountable mandates of social engineering that violate “the consent of the governed” while further sapping their prosperity, coupled with new regulations and dictates. If a good intention was a good idea, it wouldn’t need a gun—while legislators feel their societal shaping is beneficent, they neglect that compliance is coerced by the threat of force. Or worse, they think that forced compliance is good.
All of the budget items should be clearly written not squirreled away in for unaccountable spending.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
2022
Kenneth DeGraaf did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
Scorecards
A scorecard evaluates a legislator’s voting record. Its purpose is to inform voters about the legislator’s political positions. Because scorecards have varying purposes and methodologies, each report should be considered on its own merits. For example, an advocacy group’s scorecard may assess a legislator’s voting record on one issue while a state newspaper’s scorecard may evaluate the voting record in its entirety.
Ballotpedia is in the process of developing an encyclopedic list of published scorecards. Some states have a limited number of available scorecards or scorecards produced only by select groups. It is Ballotpedia’s goal to incorporate all available scorecards regardless of ideology or number.
Click here for an overview of legislative scorecards in all 50 states. To contribute to the list of scorecards, email suggestions to editor@ballotpedia.org.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the Colorado General Assembly in 2025.
- Colorado AFL-CIO — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Consumer Health Initiative — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Fiscal Institute — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- Colorado Providers Association — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the organization.
- Colorado Union of Taxpayers — Legislation is scored on its "reduction of taxes, regulation, and spending accountability."
- Colorado Voters for Animals — Legislators are scored on their stances on animal issues.
- Conservation Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills about Colorado's climate, land, water, and communities.
- Healthier Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to public health issues.
- Liberty Scorecard — Legislators are scored on votes related to "the principles of individual rights, free markets and limited government."
- Mental Health Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to mental health issues.
- The Freedom Index — Legislators are scored on their adherence to the limited government principles of the U.S. Constitution.
- Women's Lobby of Colorado — Legislators are scored on their stances on women's issues.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the Colorado General Assembly in 2024.
- Centennial Institute — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues relevant to the mission of the Centennial Institute and the strategic priorities of Colorado Christian University.
- Colorado AFL-CIO — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Consumer Health Initiative — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Union of Taxpayers — Legislation is scored on its "reduction of taxes, regulation, and spending accountability."
- Colorado Voters for Animals — Legislators are scored on their stances on animal issues.
- Conservation Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills about Colorado's climate, land, water, and communities.
- Healthier Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to public health issues.
- Liberty Scorecard — Legislators are scored on votes related to "the principles of individual rights, free markets and limited government."
- Mental Health Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to mental health issues.
- National Federation of Independent Business — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to business issues.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the Colorado General Assembly in 2023.
- Colorado AFL-CIO — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Consumer Health Initiative — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the organization supports or opposes.
- Colorado Union of Taxpayers — Legislation is scored on its "reduction of taxes, regulation, and spending accountability."
- Colorado Voters for Animals — Legislators are scored on their stances on animal issues.
- Healthier Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to public health issues.
- Liberty Scorecard — Legislators are scored on votes related to "the principles of individual rights, free markets and limited government."
- Mental Health Colorado — Legislators are scored on their votes related to mental health issues.
- The Arc of Colorado — Legislators are scored on votes related to intellectual and developmental disability legislation.
See also
2026 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Ken DeGraaf for HD-22, "Home," accessed May 6, 2023
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on September 21, 2024
| Political offices | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by Colin Larson (R) |
Colorado House of Representatives District 22 2023-Present |
Succeeded by - |

