Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Kent P. Wilsey

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Kent P. Wilsey
Image of Kent P. Wilsey
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

Iowa State University, 1992

Personal
Birthplace
Pierre, S.D.
Religion
Born Again Christian
Profession
Farmer/Rancher
Contact

Kent P. Wilsey (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the South Dakota State Senate to represent District 29. He lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Wilsey completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Wilsey was a 2012 Libertarian candidate for District 62 of the North Carolina House of Representatives.

Biography

Kent P. Wilsey was born in Pierre, South Dakota. He earned a bachelor's degree from Iowa State University in 1992. His professional experience includes working as a farmer/rancher and as an aerospace engineer.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: South Dakota State Senate elections, 2020

General election

General election for South Dakota State Senate District 29

Incumbent Gary L. Cammack defeated Kent P. Wilsey in the general election for South Dakota State Senate District 29 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Gary L. Cammack
Gary L. Cammack (R)
 
77.9
 
9,350
Image of Kent P. Wilsey
Kent P. Wilsey (L) Candidate Connection
 
22.1
 
2,656

Total votes: 12,006
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for South Dakota State Senate District 29

Incumbent Gary L. Cammack defeated Terri Jorgenson in the Republican primary for South Dakota State Senate District 29 on June 2, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Gary L. Cammack
Gary L. Cammack
 
59.0
 
2,157
Image of Terri Jorgenson
Terri Jorgenson
 
41.0
 
1,496

Total votes: 3,653
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Libertarian convention

Libertarian convention for South Dakota State Senate District 29

Kent P. Wilsey advanced from the Libertarian convention for South Dakota State Senate District 29 on May 9, 2020.

Candidate
Image of Kent P. Wilsey
Kent P. Wilsey (L) Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2012

See also: North Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2012

Wilsey ran in the 2012 election for North Carolina House of Representatives District 62. He ran unopposed in the Libertarian primary on May 8. He was defeated by incumbent John Blust (R) in the general election, which took place on November 6, 2012.[2]

North Carolina House of Representatives, District 62, General Election, 2012
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Republican Green check mark transparent.pngJohn M. Blust Incumbent 76.3% 27,633
     Libertarian Kent P. Wilsey 23.7% 8,574
Total Votes 36,207

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Kent P. Wilsey completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Wilsey's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, chief among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that to preserve these rights, governments are created among men.

I hate taxes. As a township board member, I also sat on Equalization boards for property taxes and fought for landowners. SD property tax evaluation methods appear to be intentionally obfuscated. When elected, I will work to limit the size and scope of South Dakota government in order to minimize the tax burden on residents, and maximize the freedom and economic security of people. I will work to reduce the scope of government to that required to preserve their rights.

Since the state government is likely to have severely reduced tax revenue this year and next. There will be calls to increase tax rates to cover the shortfall. My answer will be "NO!" We should reduce government employees and spending instead. My opponent voted to increase the sales tax rate, and also voted to apply sales tax directly to online sales in the state - he has voted to raise our tax burden twice.

  • I will work to minimize taxes by reducing government.
  • Key Libertarian Philosophy - you are free to do as you wish, so long as you aren't hurting anyone else.
  • Education money should follow the kids.
Taxation, especially Agriculture land tax value estimation methodology.

Minimizing taxes by minimizing state spending.

On one of South Dakota's biggest expenses - education - I have a particular interest. Education, as done by every state, is a socialist institution, and it's cost constantly goes up and the quality goes down, consistent with socialism. I would like to see us move to a capitalist education system, where parents choose what sort of education their children will have, and pick between multiple private education choices to best suit their family. As a small step toward that, I will introduce legislation to allow school districts to give scholarships to kids to attend school in places other than district-owned buildings and count those kids toward their district attendance.

Ending the war on drugs.

Jesus Christ, my father, President Eisenhower, Elon Musk. I would like to follow the example of President Eisenhower, who was the last President to reduce the size, scope, and cost of the federal government.
As an engineer, I was trained to hunt and dig down to the root cause of a problem, rather that finding an easy fix. A surprising amount of the problems facing America and South Dakota have at their root "too much government".
Working to preserve the rights of all human beings, first and foremost, their constituents.
Helping kids at a summer recreation program. I had it one summer.
Time Enough for Love by Robert A Heinlein. It's an expansive story, filled with little tidbits of wisdom.
Woodrow Wilson Smith, from Time Enough for Love.
Only the struggles common to people. Making a living, maintaining a healthy marriage, raising our children, loving other people, serving God.
Having experience is only beneficial in the first week of the legislative session. After a term or two, a legislator is beholden to too many people, too entrenched, and (at least in this case) too far removed from their constituents.
First and short term, managing the state budget with diminished revenue will be a challenge. It is hard to say what world and national issues will create challenges here
Yes. As a Libertarian, I will be outnumbered by Republicans. I will have to build relationships to get them to understand my positions.
In a perfect world, there would be no districts. People would vote for people that most closely represented their priorities. In the real world, districts should be rectangular boxes that all contain approximately the same number of people, regardless of those people's race, financial status, or political affiliation.
I would like to be on Appropriations as an advocate AGAINST spending. As a rancher, I should be on the Agriculture committee. As a former engineer, I would have a lot to offer the Commerce and Energy committee, and the Transportation committee. As mentioned, I would like to be on the Education committee.
Many times and from many ranchers, I've heard how in the 1930s, many farms and ranches were seized and sold just to pay taxes. This area is dotted with the remains of abandoned building from that era. Many ranchers believe this can happen again, if taxes aren't held in check.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

2012

Wilsey stated, "I simply believe that at all levels of government, there is too much taxing, too much spending, and way too much meddling in places government does not belong. Simply cutting budgets is not enough. Yes, we need to thin the bureaucracies every chance we get, but that is only a temporary solution. A longer lasting solution is to remove the law that mandates a government action, and return authority to the individual. This way whole branches of governments can be removed, and they will stay removed."[3]

External links

Footnotes


Current members of the South Dakota State Senate
Leadership
Majority Leader:Jim Mehlhaff
Minority Leader:Liz Larson
Senators
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
Tim Reed (R)
District 8
District 9
Joy Hohn (R)
District 10
District 11
District 12
Arch Beal (R)
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
J. Marty (R)
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
Republican Party (32)
Democratic Party (3)