Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Kirk Johnson

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Kirk Johnson
Image of Kirk Johnson
Prior offices
Arkansas 8th Judicial Circuit South Division 3

Education

Bachelor's

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1971

Law

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1974


Kirk D. Johnson was a judge for the Eighth Circuit South, in Arkansas. He served in this capacity beginning in 2003 and was re-elected with no opposition in both 2008 and 2014. His most recent term began on January 1, 2015.[1][2][3] Johnson retired from the court at the end of his term on December 31, 2020.[4]

Education

Johnson received his undergraduate degree and J.D. from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in 1971 and 1974, respectively.[5]

Career

Awards and associations

  • Vice chairman, Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission
  • Member, Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission
  • Committee for the revision of the Arkansas Model Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Arkansas Crime Laboratory Board
  • Board of directors, District Judges Association
  • First vice president, District Judges Association.
  • Secretary, District Judges Association
  • Treasurer, District Judges Association
  • Chairman, Alternate Dispute Resolution Committee for the Arkansas Judicial Council[5]

Elections

2014

See also: Arkansas judicial elections, 2014
Johnson ran for re-election to the Eighth Circuit South.
General: He won without opposition in the general election on May 20, 2014. [1][3]

Noteworthy rulings

History-making class action lawsuit

Johnson has presided over one of the largest class-action lawsuits in the history of American law. The case, known as "Colossus," revolves around a $300 million claim made against a conglomeration of insurance providers--581 were named in the original suit.

The original lawsuit, filed Sept. 8, 2004, alleges claims of civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, fraud, and constructive fraud by accusing the insurance companies of not disclosing or paying to the insureds the general contractors' overhead and profit, whenever the repair of an insured's loss required the services of at least three trades.

Although previous damage claims were paid by the insurance companies, the plaintiffs argue they are entitled to the additional general contractors' overhead and profit, the paid-for- benefit is 20 percent of the estimated job or construction cost.[7]

Allegedly, this group of insurance providers teamed together with three software companies, plotting how to rig the software to undervalue claims. The software in question is named "Colossus". With so many businesses involved, the plaintiff has claimed conspiracy to commit fraud. Tort reform experts believe the case epitomizes why the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 was needed. Ironically--or perhaps strategically-- the case was filed one day before the Act became law.[8]

In April, 2008, State Farmers Insurance filed a motion asking Judge Johnson to recuse himself from the case; shortly after, Foremost Insurance and Farmers Insurance Companies joined the motion. Apparently, Johnson himself had filed five homeowner property damage claims during the time the relevant time for the class action; Johnson says he never received payment for any of his inquiries and has said he would refuse any part of the settlement that he or any of his family members would be entitled to. He also does not believe the Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct would require his recusal.

Foremost made the news earlier in the suit, as well. In October, 2007, the company challenged Judge Johnson's order that the company "produce discovery." The company claimed doing so would cost $45 million. Judge Johnson disagreed, saying that most of the research could be provided by non-lawyer clerks. "After Judge Johnson analyzed the costs of production of Foremost's claim files, he believes 90 percent of the costs are for attorneys' fees..."[9]

See also

External links

Footnotes