Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

LEE, COMPTROLLER, v. BICKELL, et al. (1934)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
LEE, COMPTROLLER, v. BICKELL, et al.
Term: 1933
Important Dates
Argued: May 10, 1934
Decided: May 21, 1934
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerBenjamin Nathan CardozoCharles Evans HughesJames Clark McReynoldsOwen Josephus RobertsHarlan Fiske StoneGeorge SutherlandWillis Van Devanter

LEE, COMPTROLLER, v. BICKELL, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 21, 1934. The case was argued before the court on May 10, 1934.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Florida Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
  • Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Petitioner state: Florida
  • Respondent type: Broker, stock exchange, investment or securities firm
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 292 U.S. 415
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Benjamin Nathan Cardozo

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes