Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Laytonville Unified School District Bond Issue, Measure Q (November 2014)
Bond elections |
---|
2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
Property tax elections |
2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
See also |
State comparisons How voting works Approval rates |
A Laytonville Unified School District Bond Issue, Measure Q ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the Laytonville Unified School District in Mendocino County, California. It was approved.
Upon approval, Measure Q authorized the district to increase its debt by $5.5 million through issuing general obligation bonds in that amount. District officials estimated the average additional annual property tax rate required to repay these bonds to be $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value.[1]
A 55 percent supermajority vote was required for the approval of Measure Q.
Election results
Mendocino County Measure Q | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 610 | 68.69% | ||
No | 278 | 31.31% |
Election results via: Mendocino County Elections Office
Text of measure
Ballot question
The question on the ballot appeared as:[2]
“ |
To upgrade and modernize Laytonville schools, repair and replace the oldest parts of the elementary school, increase efficiency and install renewable energy upgrades to reduce operating costs, improve access to modern technology, and construct, acquire, and repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Laytonville Unified School District issue $5,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, annual financial audits, and independent citizens' oversight to ensure funds are only spent improving local schools?[3] |
” |
Impartial analysis
The following impartial analysis was prepared for Measure Q:[1]
“ |
This measure seeks voter approval for the issuance and sale of bonds in the amount of Five Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($5,500,000) to repair, upgrade, improve and better equip classrooms and facilities. The bonds will bear an interest rate within the limits authorized by law. This measure includes the accountability requirements set forth in the Constitution and Education Code. This measure shall become effective only upon the affirmative vote of fifty-five percent (55%) of those electors voting on the measure. Pursuant to Elections Code Sections 9400 et seq., the District has prepared a Tax Rate Statement which estimates the property tax levies required to pay off the bonds. The information provided is based on the District’s projections and estimates and are not binding on the District. Proceeds from the sale of the bonds authorized by this proposition, if passed, shall not be used for teacher and administrator salaries and other operating expenses. A YES vote will authorize the issuance and sale of bonds for said purposes. A NO vote will disallow the issuance and sale of bonds for said purposes.[3] |
” |
—Douglas L. Losak, acting county counsel for Mendocino County[1] |
See also
- Local school bonds on the ballot
- School bond elections in California
- Mendocino County, California ballot measures
- November 4, 2014 ballot measures in California
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Mendocino County Elections Office website, "Ballot information for Measure Q," accessed October 9, 2014
- ↑ Mendocino County Elections Office website, "List of Candidates and measures," archived October 9, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |