Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Liliana DeAvila-Silebi

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Liliana DeAvila-Silebi
New Jersey Vicinage 2 Superior Court
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education
Bachelor's
Manhattan College, 1989
Law
Seton Hall University School of Law, 1992


Liliana DeAvila-Silebi is the presiding judge on the Vicinage 2 Superior Court in New Jersey.[1] DeAvila-Silebi was appointed to the court in 2008 and was reappointed in 2015. She may serve on the bench until she reaches the mandatory retirement age in 2037.[2]

Education

DeAvila-Silebi received her undergraduate degree from Manhattan College in 1989 and her J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law in 1992.[3]

Career

Noteworthy events

Ethics charges (2016)

The New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct filed ethics charges against DeAvila-Silebi in October 2016 for an incident that occurred in May 2015. The charges alleged that the judge acted improperly when she ordered police to transfer a child from one parent to another. This happened over a weekend when DeAvila-Silebi was serving as an emergent judge and she received a phone call from a man claiming to be an attorney. The man, who turned out not to be an attorney, told the judge that the child was with the father and was supposed to have been transferred to the mother for the weekend. He also claimed that the father had kept the child out of school all week.[4]

The advisory committee said that DeAvila-Silebi did not review the custody order, did not confirm the relationship between the child and the caller, did not confirm the venue, and acted on a matter that was outside her jurisdiction (she was in the process of transferring from one county to another). "Given the volume, the unexpectedness, and the ex parte nature of these emergent phone calls, it would be very unreasonable and unrealistic to expect an emergent judge, without the benefit of a court staff or even a file, to field an emergent call on a weekend and completely vet the entire situation prior to making a decision," said DeAvila-Silebi's attorney Raymond Reddin.[4] DeAvila-Silebi's hearing with the advisory committee was on March 22, 2017.[5]

In November 2017, the Committee on Judicial Conduct released its recommendation that DeAvila-Silebi be removed from office. Three judges—Carmen Messano, Deborah Silverman Katz, and Lisa P. Thornton—have been assigned by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner to continue investigating the incident and make their own recommendation.[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes