MALINDA FOX v. THE STATE OF OHIO (1847)

![]() |
MALINDA FOX v. THE STATE OF OHIO |
---|
Term: 1847 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 10, 1847 |
Decided: February 22, 1847 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
John Catron • Peter Vivian Daniel • Robert Cooper Grier • John McKinley • Samuel Nelson • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne • Levi Woodbury |
Dissenting |
John McLean |
MALINDA FOX v. THE STATE OF OHIO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 22, 1847. The case was argued before the court on February 10, 1847.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1840s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: financial (other than in fraud or internal revenue)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Ohio
- Citation: 46 U.S. 410
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Peter Vivian Daniel
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes