Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
MARGARET KAWAAUHAU, ET VIR v. PAUL W. GEIGER (1998)

![]() |
MARGARET KAWAAUHAU, ET VIR v. PAUL W. GEIGER |
---|
Term: 1997 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 21, 1998 |
Decided: March 3, 1998 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
MARGARET KAWAAUHAU, ET VIR v. PAUL W. GEIGER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 3, 1998. The case was argued before the court on January 21, 1998.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Missouri Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Bankruptcy (except in the context of priority of federal fiscal claims)
- Petitioner: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: physician, MD or DO, dentist, or medical society
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 523 U.S. 57
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes