MARTIN v. OHIO (1987)

![]() |
MARTIN v. OHIO |
---|
Term: 1986 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 2, 1986 |
Decided: February 25, 1987 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens • Byron White |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • Lewis Powell |
MARTIN v. OHIO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 25, 1987. The case was argued before the court on December 2, 1986.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: miscellaneous (cf. loyalty oath), the residual code
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Ohio
- Citation: 480 U.S. 228
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Byron White
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes