Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
MARVIN D. HORNE, et al., PETITIONERS v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2013)

![]() |
MARVIN D. HORNE, et al., PETITIONERS v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE |
---|
Term: 2012 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 20, 2013 |
Decided: June 10, 2013 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas |
MARVIN D. HORNE, et al., PETITIONERS v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 10, 2013. The case was argued before the court on March 20, 2013.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Farmer, farm worker, or farm organization
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: United States
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 569 U.S. 513
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes