Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
MASSACHUSETTS v. PAINTEN (1968)

| MASSACHUSETTS v. PAINTEN |
|---|
| Term: 1967 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: October 18, 1967 |
| Decided: January 15, 1968 |
| Outcome |
| Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • William Douglas • Thurgood Marshall • Earl Warren |
| Concurring |
| Abe Fortas |
| Dissenting |
| John Harlan II • Potter Stewart • Byron White |
MASSACHUSETTS v. PAINTEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 15, 1968. The case was argued before the court on October 18, 1967.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Massachusetts U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - search and seizure (other than as pertains to vehicles or Crime Control Act)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Massachusetts
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 389 U.S. 560
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes