Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

MCDONALD et al. v. SANTA FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION CO. et al. (1976)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
MCDONALD et al. v. SANTA FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION CO. et al.
Term: 1975
Important Dates
Argued: April 20, 1976
Decided: June 25, 1976
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanWarren BurgerThurgood MarshallLewis PowellJohn Paul StevensPotter Stewart
Concurring
William RehnquistByron White

MCDONALD et al. v. SANTA FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION CO. et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 25, 1976. The case was argued before the court on April 20, 1976.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Texas Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1970s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - employment discrimination: on basis of race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, or working conditions.
  • Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 427 U.S. 273
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Thurgood Marshall

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes