Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (1994)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
Term: 1993
Important Dates
Argued: March 21, 1994
Decided: June 17, 1994
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-3
Majority
Ruth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedyWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Dissenting
Harry BlackmunDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 17, 1994. The case was argued before the court on March 21, 1994.

In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulations of public utilities regulation: telephone or telegraph company
  • Petitioner: Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 512 U.S. 218
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes