Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. et al. v. PEOPLE AGAINST NUCLEAR ENERGY et al. (1983)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. et al. v. PEOPLE AGAINST NUCLEAR ENERGY et al.
Term: 1982
Important Dates
Argued: March 1, 1983
Decided: April 19, 1983
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWarren BurgerThurgood MarshallSandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
William Brennan

METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. et al. v. PEOPLE AGAINST NUCLEAR ENERGY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 19, 1983. The case was argued before the court on March 1, 1983.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
  • Petitioner: Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Environmental organization
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 460 U.S. 766
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes