Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE (2009)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE
Term: 2008
Important Dates
Argued: January 13, 2009
Decided: March 24, 2009
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Samuel AlitoStephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterJohn Paul StevensClarence Thomas

MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 24, 2009. The case was argued before the court on January 13, 2009.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - indigents: inadequate representation by counsel (cf. right to counsel)
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 556 U.S. 111
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes