Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE (2009)

![]() |
MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE |
---|
Term: 2008 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 13, 2009 |
Decided: March 24, 2009 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
MICHAEL A. KNOWLES, WARDEN v. ALEXANDRE MIRZAYANCE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 24, 2009. The case was argued before the court on January 13, 2009.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - indigents: inadequate representation by counsel (cf. right to counsel)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 556 U.S. 111
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes