Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

MICHAEL YARBOROUGH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ALVARADO (2004)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
MICHAEL YARBOROUGH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ALVARADO
Term: 2003
Important Dates
Argued: March 1, 2004
Decided: June 1, 2004
Outcome
Reversed
Vote
5-4
Majority
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas
Concurring
Sandra Day O'Connor
Dissenting
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens

MICHAEL YARBOROUGH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ALVARADO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 1, 2004. The case was argued before the court on March 1, 2004.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Miranda warnings
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 541 U.S. 652
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=MICHAEL_YARBOROUGH,_WARDEN_v._MICHAEL_ALVARADO_(2004)&oldid=9499254"