Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

MING & ANOTHER v. WOOLFOLK (1886)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
MING & ANOTHER v. WOOLFOLK
Term: 1885
Important Dates
Decided: February 1, 1886
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Samuel Blatchford • Joseph Bradley • Stephen Johnson Field • Horace Gray • John Marshall Harlan • Stanley Matthews • Samuel Freeman Miller • Morrison Waite • William Burnham Woods

MING & ANOTHER v. WOOLFOLK is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 1, 1886.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Montana Territorial Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1880s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Waite Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Private Action - Commercial transactions
  • Petitioner: Insurance company, or surety
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Insurance company, or surety
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 116 U.S. 599
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Morrison Waite
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Burnham Woods

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=MING_%26_ANOTHER_v._WOOLFOLK_(1886)&oldid=9499466"