Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
MOODY et al. v. FLOWERS et al. (1967)

![]() |
MOODY et al. v. FLOWERS et al. |
---|
Term: 1966 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 18, 1967 |
Decided: May 22, 1967 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • William Brennan • Tom Clark • William Douglas • Abe Fortas • John Harlan II • Potter Stewart • Earl Warren • Byron White |
MOODY et al. v. FLOWERS et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 22, 1967. The case was argued before the court on April 18, 1967.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alabama Middle U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - subconstitutional fair procedure: timeliness
- Petitioner: voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL)
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Respondent state: Alabama
- Citation: 387 U.S. 97
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Douglas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes