Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
MUSSINA v. CAVAZOS (1867)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| MUSSINA v. CAVAZOS |
|---|
| Term: 1867 |
| Important Dates |
| Decided: December 16, 1867 |
| Outcome |
| No disposition |
| Vote |
| 7-1 |
| Majority |
| Salmon Portland Chase • Nathan Clifford • David Davis • Stephen Johnson Field • Robert Cooper Grier • Samuel Freeman Miller • Samuel Nelson |
| Dissenting |
| Noah Haynes Swayne |
MUSSINA v. CAVAZOS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 16, 1867.
The U.S. Supreme Court did not issue a ruling. The case originated from the Texas Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1860s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Chase Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - State or local government regulation, especially of business (cf. federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction, federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation)
- Petitioner: Unidentifiable
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Defendant
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 73 U.S. 355
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Salmon Portland Chase
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Samuel Freeman Miller
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
