This Giving Tuesday, help ensure voters have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions. Donate now!
Maine Marine Businesses Bond Issue, Question 7 (2014)
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
The Maine Marine Businesses Bond Issue, Question 7 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Maine as a legislatively referred bond question, where it was approved. The measure was designed to issue $7 million in bonds to facilitate growth of marine businesses.[1]
Election results
Below are the official, certified election results:
| Maine Question 7 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 344,783 | 59.08% | |||
| No | 238,793 | 40.92% | ||
Election results via: Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions
Text of measure
Ballot title
The question appeared on the ballot as follows:[1]
| “ | Do you favor a $7,000,000 bond issue to facilitate the growth of marine businesses and commercial enterprises that create jobs and improve the sustainability of the State’s marine economy and related industries through capital investments, to be matched by at least $7,000,000 in private and other funds?”[2] |
” |
Full text
The full text of the measure was as follows:[3]
| “ | Preamble. Two thirds of both Houses of the Legislature deeming it necessary in accordance with the Constitution of Maine, Article IX, Section 14 to authorize the issuance of bonds on behalf of the State of Maine to provide funds as described in this Act,
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: Sec. A-1. Authorization of bonds. The Treasurer of State is authorized, under the direction of the Governor, to issue bonds in the name and on behalf of the State in an amount not exceeding $7,000,000 for the purposes described in section 5 of this Part. The bonds are a pledge of the full faith and credit of the State. The bonds may not run for a period longer than 10 years from the date of the original issue of the bonds. Sec. A-2. Records of bonds issued; Treasurer of State. The Treasurer of State shall ensure that an account of each bond is kept showing the number of the bond, the name of the successful bidder to whom sold, the amount received for the bond, the date of sale and the date when payable. Sec. A-3. Sale; how negotiated; proceeds appropriated. The Treasurer of State may negotiate the sale of the bonds by direction of the Governor, but no bond may be loaned, pledged or hypothecated on behalf of the State. The proceeds of the sale of the bonds, which must be held by the Treasurer of State and paid by the Treasurer of State upon warrants drawn by the State Controller, are appropriated solely for the purposes set forth in this Part. Any unencumbered balances remaining at the completion of the project in this Part lapse to the Office of the Treasurer of State to be used for the retirement of general obligation bonds. Sec. A-4. Interest and debt retirement. The Treasurer of State shall pay interest due or accruing on any bonds issued under this Part and all sums coming due for payment of bonds at maturity. Sec. A-5. Disbursement of bond proceeds from General Fund bond issue. The proceeds of the sale of the bonds authorized under this Part must be expended as designated in the following schedule under the direction and supervision of the agencies and entities set forth in this section. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF Maine Technology Institute Provides funds to facilitate the growth of marine businesses and commercial enterprises that create jobs and improve the sustainability of the State's marine economy and related industries through capital investments, awarded after a competitive process administered by the Department of Economic and Community Development in consultation with the Department of Marine Resources and the Maine Technology Institute, to be matched by at least $7,000,000 in private and other funds. Total $7,000,000 Sec. A-6. Contingent upon ratification of bond issue. Sections 1 to 5 do not become effective unless the people of the State ratify the issuance of the bonds as set forth in this Part. Sec. A-7. Appropriation balances at year-end. At the end of each fiscal year, all unencumbered appropriation balances representing state money carry forward. Bond proceeds that have not been expended within 10 years after the date of the sale of the bonds lapse to the Office of the Treasurer of State to be used for the retirement of general obligation bonds. Sec. A-8. Bonds authorized but not issued. Any bonds authorized but not issued within 5 years of ratification of this Part are deauthorized and may not be issued, except that the Legislature may, within 2 years after the expiration of that 5-year period, extend the period for issuing any remaining unissued bonds for an additional amount of time not to exceed 5 years. Sec. A-9. Referendum for ratification; submission at election; form of question; effective date. This Part must be submitted to the legal voters of the State at a statewide election held in the month of November following passage of this Act. The municipal officers of this State shall notify the inhabitants of their respective cities, towns and plantations to meet, in the manner prescribed by law for holding a statewide election, to vote on the acceptance or rejection of this Part by voting on the following question: The legal voters of each city, town and plantation shall vote by ballot on this question and designate their choice by a cross or check mark placed within a corresponding square below the word "Yes" or "No." The ballots must be received, sorted, counted and declared in open ward, town and plantation meetings and returns made to the Secretary of State in the same manner as votes for members of the Legislature. The Governor shall review the returns. If a majority of the legal votes are cast in favor of this Part, the Governor shall proclaim the result without delay and this Part becomes effective 30 days after the date of the proclamation. The Secretary of State shall prepare and furnish to each city, town and plantation all ballots, returns and copies of this Part necessary to carry out the purposes of this referendum. Sec. B-1. Determination of awards. The Department of Economic and Community Development, in consultation with the Department of Marine Resources and the Maine Technology Institute, shall oversee the disbursement of bond proceeds and matching funds authorized pursuant to Part A in accordance with this section. Awards of bond proceeds and matching funds must be made on a competitive basis following a request for proposal process for a single award of $7,000,000. 1. A successful applicant must include the following entities:
2. A successful application must also include proposals for growth in each of the following areas:
Sec. C-1. Report. The Department of Economic and Community Development shall report by January 15th annually, until the bond proceeds authorized by this Act have been fully expended, on the use of the bond proceeds to the joint standing committees of the Legislature having jurisdiction over appropriations and financial affairs and research and economic development matters. Sec. C-2. Contingent effective date. Part B and this Part take effect only if the General Fund bond issue proposed in Part A is approved by the voters of the State. [2] |
” |
Background
The election that took place in Maine on November 4, 2014, is known as a referendum election. According to the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, "Referendum Elections are held to provide Maine’s citizens an opportunity to vote on People’s Veto Referenda, Direct initiatives of Legislation (i.e. Citizen Initiatives), Bond Issues, other referenda proposed by the Legislature, and Constitutional Amendments. Referendum elections are an important part of the heritage of public participation in Maine."[4]
Support
Supporters
- Sen. Roger Katz (R-24)[5]
- Rep. Seth Berry (D-67)[6]
- Rep. Joyce Maker (R-31)
SP 675 "Yes" votes
The following members of the Maine Legislature voted in favor of placing this measure on the ballot.[7][8]
- Note: A yes vote on SP 675 merely referred the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators approved of the stipulations laid out in Question 7.
Senate
- Justin Alfond (D-8)
- James Boyle (D-6)
- David C. Burns (R-29)
- Emily Cain (D-30)
- John Cleveland (D-15)
- Ronald Collins (R-2)
- Margaret Craven (D-16)
- Andre Cushing (R-33)
- David Dutremble (D-4)
- Patrick Flood (R-21)
- Stanley Gerzofsky (D-10)
- Geoffrey Gratwick (D-32)
- Anne Haskell (D-9)
- Dawn Hill (D-1)
- Troy Dale Jackson (D-35)
- Chris Johnson (D-20)
- Roger Katz (R-24)
- Colleen Lachowicz (D-25)
- Brian Langley (R-28)
- Edward Mazurek (D-22)
- John Patrick (D-14)
- Gary Plummer (R-12)
- Roger Sherman (R-34)
- John Tuttle (D-3)
- Linda Valentino (D-5)
- Eloise Vitelli (D-19)
- Rodney Whittemore (R-26)
- Richard Woodbury (NP-11)
House
- Paulette Beaudoin (D-135)
- Michael Beaulieu (R-68)
- Roberta Beavers (D-148)
- Henry Beck (D-76)
- Seth Berry (D-67)
- Andrea Boland (D-142)
- Brian Bolduc (D-69)
- Sheryl Briggs (D-93)
- Joseph Brooks (I-42)
- James Campbell, Sr. (I-138)
- Richard Campbell (R-40)
- Michael Carey (D-72)
- Alan Casavant (D-137)
- Katherine Cassidy (D-32)
- Ralph Chapman (D-37)
- Kathleen Chase (R-147)
- Justin Chenette (D-134)
- Benjamin Chipman (I-119)
- Tyler Clark (R-6)
- Janice Cooper (D-107)
- Matthea Daughtry (D-66)
- Jennifer DeChant (D-62)
- Michael Devin (D-51)
- Elizabeth Dickerson (D-47)
- James Dill (D-14)
- Mark Dion (D-113)
- Peter Doak (R-33)
- Ann Dorney (D-86)
- Jeffrey Evangelos (I-49)
- Mark Eves (D-146)
- Richard Farnsworth (D-117)
- Lori Fowle (D-58)
- Kenneth Fredette (R-25)
- Aaron Frey (D-18)
- Andrew Gattine (D-126)
- Sara Gideon (D-106)
- Paul Gilbert (D-87)
- James Gillway (R-41)
- Adam Goode (D-15)
- Anne Graham (D-109)
- Gay Grant (D-59)
- Scott Hamann (D-123)
- Denise Harlow (D-116)
- Teresea Hayes (D-94)
- Erin Herbig (D-43)
- Craig Hickman (D-82)
- Barry Hobbins (D-133)
- Brian Hubbell (D-35)
- Brian Jones (D-45)
- Erik Jorgensen (D-115)
- Bryan Kaenrath (D-124)
- Peter Kent (D-65)
- Dennis Keschl (R-83)
- L. Gary Knight (R-81)
- Victoria Kornfield (D-17)
- Charles Kruger (D-48)
- Walter Kumiega (D-36)
- Karen Kusiak (D-84)
- Michel Lajoie (D-71)
- Nathan Libby (D-73)
- Thomas Longstaff (D-77)
- Louis Luchini (D-38)
- Sharri MacDonald (R-132)
- W. Bruce MacDonald (R-61)
- Joyce Maker (R-31)
- Richard Malaby (R-34)
- Donald Marean (R-131)
- Timothy Marks (D-53)
- Andrew Mason (D-60)
- Anne-Marie Mastraccio (D-143)
- Jeff McCabe (D-85)
- Paul McGowan (D-149)
- Andrew McLean (D-129)
- Kimberly Monaghan-Derrig (D-121)
- Matthew Moonen (D-118)
- Stephen Moriarty (D-108)
- Terry Morrison (D-122)
- Catherine Nadeau (D-54)
- Mary Nelson (Maine) (D-112)
- Robert Nutting (R-78)
- Wayne Parry (R-140)
- Ann Peoples (D-125)
- Matthew Peterson (D-92)
- Joshua Plante (D-145)
- Matthew Pouliot (R-57)
- Christine Powers (D-101)
- Charles Priest (D-63)
- Jane Pringle (D-111)
- Helen Rankin (D-97)
- Megan Rochelo (D-136)
- Margaret Rotundo (D-74)
- Diane Russell (D-120)
- Deane Rykerson (D-151)
- Linda Sanborn (D-130)
- Robert Saucier (D-5)
- Jeremy Saxton (D-64)
- John Schneck (D-16)
- Michael Shaw (D-102)
- Stanley Short (D-29)
- Stephen Stanley (D-10)
- Peter Stuckey (D-114)
- Charles Theriault (D-2)
- Ryan Tipping-Spitz (D-19)
- Sharon Treat (D-79)
- Arthur Verow (D-21)
- Lisa Villa (D-98)
- Amy Volk (R-127)
- Windol Weaver (R-150)
- Joan Welsh (D-46)
- R. Wayne Werts (D-70)
- Alexander Willette (R-7)
- Corey Wilson (R-56)
- Ellen Winchenbach (R-50)
- Tom Winsor (R-95)
Arguments
The Maine League of Women Voters listed the following as arguments in favor of Question 7 in their voters' guide:[9]
| “ |
|
” |
Opposition
SP 675 "No" votes
The following members of the Maine Legislature voted against placing this measure on the ballot.[7][8]
- Note: A no vote on SP 675 meant that a legislator did not want to refer the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators disapproved of the stipulations laid out in Question 7.
Senate
- James Hamper (R-13)
- Garrett Mason (R-17)
- Michael Thibodeau (R-23)
- Douglas Thomas (R-27)
House
- Paul Bennett (R-141)
- Russell Black (R-90)
- Dale Crafts (R-104)
- Dean Cray (R-28)
- Jarrod Crockett (R-91)
- Paul Davis, Sr. (R-26)
- Larry Dunphy (R-88)
- Brian Duprey (R-39)
- Eleanor Espling (R-105)
- Joyce Ann Fitzpatrick (R-8)
- Jeffery Gifford (R-12)
- Stacey Guerin (R-22)
- Lance Harvell (R-89)
- Roger Jackson (R-100)
- Peter Johnson (R-27)
- Jonathan Kinney (R-99)
- Aaron Libby (R-139)
- Lawrence Lockman (R-30)
- Ricky Long (R-9)
- Michael McClellan (R-103)
- Carol McElwee (R-4)
- Melvin Newendyke (R-80)
- Jethro Pease (R-44)
- Anita Peavey Haskell (R-13)
- Roger Reed (R-23)
- Deborah Sanderson (R-52)
- Heather Sirocki (R-128)
- Jeffrey Timberlake (R-96)
- Beth Turner (R-11)
- Thomas Tyler (R-110)
- Raymond Wallace (R-24)
- Stephen Wood (R-75)
Arguments
The Maine League of Women Voters listed the following as arguments in opposition to Question 7 in their voters' guide:[9]
| “ |
|
” |
Media editorial positions
Support
- The Bangor Daily News said,
| “ | With potentially wholesale changes in store for Maine’s fisheries, the state’s seafood trade needs to have the ability to adapt and still realize value from one of the state’s key sectors. Question 7 on the November ballot is an acknowledgment of the critical importance of Maine’s fisheries and a nod to the need for planning for their future. The ballot initiative deserves voters’ support...Maine has woefully underinvested in research and development in recent years, and the state has failed to stick to a consistent strategy when making its investments. We would have preferred to see the $7 million proposed in Question 7 funneled through the Maine Technology Asset Fund, where the competition wouldn’t be limited to one sector that might or might not offer the best return on the state’s R&D investment.
Still, the economic importance of Maine’s fisheries is clear, and Question 7 offers Maine a chance to prepare for a future in an industry that’s going to require adaptation.[2] |
” |
| —Bangor Daily News[10] | ||
- The Portland Press Herald said,
| “ | Projects funded through the bond could include creating processing capacity in Maine for the state’s extremely valuable elvers, which are now harvested and shipped to China and on to Japan, where they are raised to adulthood and sold in markets in Europe and North America.
It could mean building on the work being done at the Downeast Institute in Beals, which is trying to create a new market for surf clams. It could mean finding how to use the waste generated by lobster processing, or how to benefit from the growing populations of green crabs and dogfish now being found in the Gulf of Maine. In any case, the funding from Question 7 would help create more value out of one of Maine’s chief industries.[2] |
” |
| —Portland Press Herald[11] | ||
Opposition
- The Maine Current said,
| “ | Like questions 4 and 5, Question 7 offers little in the way of helpful information, and voters should defeat it solely on that basis. It asks voters to approve $7 million “to facilitate the growth of marine businesses and commercial enterprises that create jobs and improve sustainability of the state’s marine economy and related industries through capital investments to be matched by at least another $7 million in private and other funds.” Our reaction to the question is, why is the government choosing to prop up the marine economy. Why not another sector such as the logging and paper industry, or perhaps the artisanal cheese economy or maybe, dare we say, the newspaper industry?[2] | ” |
| —Maine Current[12] | ||
Path to the ballot
- See also: Legislatively-referred state statute
According to Article IX, Section 14 of the Maine Constitution, a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the Maine Legislature was required to put bond issues before voters.
The Maine Senate and Maine House of Representatives passed SP 675 on April 17, 2014.[13]
Senate vote
April 17, 2014 Senate vote
| Maine SP 675 Senate Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 28 | 87.50% | |||
| No | 4 | 12.50% | ||
House vote
April 17, 2014 House vote
| Maine SP 675 Assembly Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 114 | 78.08% | |||
| No | 32 | 21.92% | ||
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Maine Secretary of State, "Upcoming Elections: November 4, 2014 - General Election," accessed August 7, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Maine Legislature, "Legislative Document No. 1709," April 30, 2014
- ↑ Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, "Upcoming Elections," accessed September 9, 2014
- ↑ Central Maine, "Bond issues deserve our support," October 22, 2014
- ↑ Bangor Daily News, "Where a Democrat, Republican agree: Innovation bonds are crucial to Maine’s future," October 22, 2014
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Open States, "Senate Vote on SP 675," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 OpenStates.org, "House Vote on SP 675," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 League of Women Voters of Maine, "Voter Guide for Maine General Election: November 4, 2014," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ Bangor Daily News, "Yes on Question 7: Maine needs to prepare for a changing fisheries future," October 21, 2014
- ↑ Portland Press Herald, "Our View: R&D bonds necessary to reshape Maine’s economy," October 26, 2014
- ↑ Maine Current, "Editorial: A question of bonds," October 8, 2014
- ↑ Open States, "SP 675," accessed October 21, 2014
State of Maine Augusta (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
