Maine Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory Bond Issue, Question 5 (2014)
| |||||||||||||
|
The Maine Tissue Repair and Regeneration Laboratory Bond Issue, Question 5 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Maine as a legislatively referred bond question, where it was approved. The measure issued $3 million in bonds to modernize and expand laboratory specializing in tissue repair and regeneration.[1]
Election results
Below are the official, certified election results:
Maine Question 5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 297,008 | 51.15% | ||
No | 283,632 | 48.85% |
Election results via: Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions
Text of measure
Ballot title
The language appeared on the ballot as:[1]
“ | Do you favor a $3,000,000 bond issue, to be awarded through a competitive process and to be matched by $5,700,000 in private and public funds, to modernize and expand infrastructure in a biological laboratory specializing in tissue repair and regeneration located in the State in order to increase biotechnology workforce training, retain and recruit to the State multiple biomedical research and development groups and create a drug discovery and development facility that will improve human health and stimulate biotechnology job growth and economic activity?[2] |
” |
Text of legislation
The full text of the legislation that referred this measure to the ballot was as follows:[3]
“ |
An Act To Authorize a General Fund Bond Issue To Support Human Health Research in Maine Preamble. Two thirds of both Houses of the Legislature deeming it necessary in accordance with the Constitution of Maine, Article IX, Section 14 to authorize the issuance of bonds on behalf of the State of Maine to provide funds as described in this Act, Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: Sec. 1. Authorization of bonds. The Treasurer of State is authorized, under the direction of the Governor, to issue bonds in the name and on behalf of the State in an amount not exceeding $3,000,000 for the purposes described in section 5 of this Act. The bonds are a pledge of the full faith and credit of the State. The bonds may not run for a period longer than 10 years from the date of the original issue of the bonds. Sec. 2. Records of bonds issued; Treasurer of State. The Treasurer of State shall ensure that an account of each bond is kept showing the number of the bond, the name of the successful bidder to whom sold, the amount received for the bond, the date of sale and the date when payable. Sec. 3. Sale; how negotiated; proceeds appropriated. The Treasurer of State may negotiate the sale of the bonds by direction of the Governor, but no bond may be loaned, pledged or hypothecated on behalf of the State. The proceeds of the sale of the bonds, which must be held by the Treasurer of State and paid by the Treasurer of State upon warrants drawn by the State Controller, are appropriated solely for the purposes set forth in this Act. Any unencumbered balances remaining at the completion of the project in this Act lapse to the Office of the Treasurer of State to be used for the retirement of general obligation bonds. Sec. 4. Interest and debt retirement. The Treasurer of State shall pay interest due or accruing on any bonds issued under this Act and all sums coming due for payment of bonds at maturity. Sec. 5. Disbursement of bond proceeds from General Fund bond issue. The proceeds of the sale of the bonds authorized under this Act must be expended as designated in the following schedule under the direction and supervision of the agencies and entities set forth in this section. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF Maine Technology Institute Provides funds, to be awarded through a competitive process to institutions that, as of the effective date of this Act, have been designated as Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences and have also received IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence grants and to be matched by $5,700,000 in private and public funds, to modernize and expand infrastructure in a biological laboratory specializing in tissue repair and regeneration located in the State, in order to increase biotechnology workforce training, retain and recruit to the State multiple biomedical research and development groups and create a drug discovery and development facility that will improve human health and stimulate biotechnology job growth and economic activity. Total . . . . . . $3,000,000 Sec. 6. Contingent upon ratification of bond issue. Sections 1 to 5 do not become effective unless the people of the State ratify the issuance of the bonds as set forth in this Act. Sec. 7. Appropriation balances at year-end. At the end of each fiscal year, all unencumbered appropriation balances representing state money carry forward. Bond proceeds that have not been expended within 10 years after the date of the sale of the bonds lapse to the Office of the Treasurer of State to be used for the retirement of general obligation bonds. Sec. 8. Bonds authorized but not issued. Any bonds authorized but not issued within 5 years of ratification of this Act are deauthorized and may not be issued, except that the Legislature may, within 2 years after the expiration of that 5-year period, extend the period for issuing any remaining unissued bonds for an additional amount of time not to exceed 5 years. Sec. 9. Report. The Department of Economic and Community Development shall report by January 15th annually, until the bond proceeds authorized by this Act have been fully expended, to the joint standing committees of the Legislature having jurisdiction over appropriations and financial affairs and research and economic development matters. Sec. 10. Referendum for ratification; submission at election; form of question; effective date. This Act must be submitted to the legal voters of the State at a statewide election held in the month of November following passage of this Act. The municipal officers of this State shall notify the inhabitants of their respective cities, towns and plantations to meet, in the manner prescribed by law for holding a statewide election, to vote on the acceptance or rejection of this Act by voting on the following question:
The legal voters of each city, town and plantation shall vote by ballot on this question and designate their choice by a cross or check mark placed within a corresponding square below the word "Yes" or "No." The ballots must be received, sorted, counted and declared in open ward, town and plantation meetings and returns made to the Secretary of State in the same manner as votes for members of the Legislature. The Governor shall review the returns. If a majority of the legal votes are cast in favor of this Act, the Governor shall proclaim the result without delay and this Act becomes effective 30 days after the date of the proclamation. The Secretary of State shall prepare and furnish to each city, town and plantation all ballots, returns and copies of this Act necessary to carry out the purposes of this referendum.[2] |
” |
Fiscal note
The fiscal note was as follows:[4]
Background
The election that took place in Maine on November 4, 2014, is known as a referendum election. According to the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, "Referendum Elections are held to provide Maine’s citizens an opportunity to vote on People’s Veto Referenda, Direct initiatives of Legislation (i.e. Citizen Initiatives), Bond Issues, other referenda proposed by the Legislature, and Constitutional Amendments. Referendum elections are an important part of the heritage of public participation in Maine."[5]
Support
Supporters
- Sen. Roger Katz (R-24)[6]
- Rep. Seth Berry (D-67)[7]
- Rep. Joyce Maker (R-31)
SP 421 "Yes" votes
The following members of the Maine Legislature voted in favor of placing this measure on the ballot.[8][9]
- Note: A yes vote on SP 421 merely referred the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators approved of the stipulations laid out in Question 5.
Senate
- Justin Alfond (D-8)
- James Boyle (D-6)
- David C. Burns (R-29)
- Emily Cain (D-30)
- John Cleveland (D-15)
- Ronald Collins (R-2)
- Margaret Craven (D-16)
- Andre Cushing (R-33)
- David Dutremble (D-4)
- Patrick Flood (R-21)
- Stanley Gerzofsky (D-10)
- Geoffrey Gratwick (D-32)
- Anne Haskell (D-9)
- Dawn Hill (D-1)
- Troy Dale Jackson (D-35)
- Chris Johnson (D-20)
- Roger Katz (R-24)
- Colleen Lachowicz (D-25)
- Brian Langley (R-28)
- Edward Mazurek (D-22)
- John Patrick (D-14)
- Roger Sherman (R-34)
- John Tuttle (D-3)
- Linda Valentino (D-5)
- Eloise Vitelli (D-19)
- Richard Woodbury (NP-11)
House
- Paulette Beaudoin (D-135)
- Michael Beaulieu (R-68)
- Roberta Beavers (D-148)
- Henry Beck (D-76)
- Seth Berry (D-67)
- Andrea Boland (D-142)
- Sheryl Briggs (D-93)
- Joseph Brooks (I-42)
- James Campbell, Sr. (I-138)
- Richard Campbell (R-40)
- Michael Carey (D-72)
- Alan Casavant (D-137)
- Katherine Cassidy (D-32)
- Ralph Chapman (D-37)
- Kathleen Chase (R-147)
- Justin Chenette (D-134)
- Benjamin Chipman (I-119)
- Tyler Clark (R-6)
- Janice Cooper (D-107)
- Matthea Daughtry (D-66)
- Jennifer DeChant (D-62)
- Michael Devin (D-51)
- Elizabeth Dickerson (D-47)
- James Dill (D-14)
- Mark Dion (D-113)
- Peter Doak (R-33)
- Ann Dorney (D-86)
- Jeffrey Evangelos (I-49)
- Mark Eves (D-146)
- Richard Farnsworth (D-117)
- Lori Fowle (D-58)
- Kenneth Fredette (R-25)
- Aaron Frey (D-18)
- Andrew Gattine (D-126)
- Sara Gideon (D-106)
- Paul Gilbert (D-87)
- James Gillway (R-41)
- Adam Goode (D-15)
- Anne Graham (D-109)
- Gay Grant (D-59)
- Scott Hamann (D-123)
- Denise Harlow (D-116)
- Teresea Hayes (D-94)
- Erin Herbig (D-43)
- Craig Hickman (D-82)
- Barry Hobbins (D-133)
- Brian Hubbell (D-35)
- Brian Jones (D-45)
- Erik Jorgensen (D-115)
- Bryan Kaenrath (D-124)
- Peter Kent (D-65)
- Dennis Keschl (R-83)
- L. Gary Knight (R-81)
- Victoria Kornfield (D-17)
- Charles Kruger (D-48)
- Walter Kumiega (D-36)
- Karen Kusiak (D-84)
- Michel Lajoie (D-71)
- Nathan Libby (D-73)
- Thomas Longstaff (D-77)
- Louis Luchini (D-38)
- Sharri MacDonald (R-132)
- W. Bruce MacDonald (R-61)
- Joyce Maker (R-31)
- Richard Malaby (R-34)
- Donald Marean (R-131)
- Timothy Marks (D-53)
- Andrew Mason (D-60)
- Anne-Marie Mastraccio (D-143)
- Jeff McCabe (D-85)
- Paul McGowan (D-149)
- Andrew McLean (D-129)
- Kimberly Monaghan-Derrig (D-121)
- Matthew Moonen (D-118)
- Stephen Moriarty (D-108)
- Terry Morrison (D-122)
- Catherine Nadeau (D-54)
- Mary Nelson (Maine) (D-112)
- Robert Nutting (R-78)
- Wayne Parry (R-140)
- Ann Peoples (D-125)
- Matthew Peterson (D-92)
- Joshua Plante (D-145)
- Matthew Pouliot (R-57)
- Christine Powers (D-101)
- Charles Priest (D-63)
- Jane Pringle (D-111)
- Helen Rankin (D-97)
- Megan Rochelo (D-136)
- Margaret Rotundo (D-74)
- Diane Russell (D-120)
- Deane Rykerson (D-151)
- Linda Sanborn (D-130)
- Robert Saucier (D-5)
- Jeremy Saxton (D-64)
- John Schneck (D-16)
- Michael Shaw (D-102)
- Stanley Short (D-29)
- Stephen Stanley (D-10)
- Peter Stuckey (D-114)
- Charles Theriault (D-2)
- Ryan Tipping-Spitz (D-19)
- Sharon Treat (D-79)
- Arthur Verow (D-21)
- Lisa Villa (D-98)
- Amy Volk (R-127)
- Raymond Wallace (R-24)
- Joan Welsh (D-46)
- R. Wayne Werts (D-70)
- Alexander Willette (R-7)
- Corey Wilson (R-56)
- Ellen Winchenbach (R-50)
- Tom Winsor (R-95)
Arguments
The Maine League of Women Voters listed the following as arguments in favor of Question 5 in their voters' guide:[10]
“ |
|
” |
Opposition
SP 421 "No" votes
The following members of the Maine Legislature voted against placing this measure on the ballot.[8][9]
- Note: A no vote on SP 421 meant that a legislator did not want to refer the question to voters and did not necessarily mean these legislators disapproved of the stipulations laid out in Question 5.
Senate
- James Hamper (R-13)
- Garrett Mason (R-17)
- Gary Plummer (R-12)
- Michael Thibodeau (R-23)
- Douglas Thomas (R-27)
- Rodney Whittemore (R-26)
House
- Paul Bennett (R-141)
- Russell Black (R-90)
- Dale Crafts (R-104)
- Dean Cray (R-28)
- Jarrod Crockett (R-91)
- Paul Davis, Sr. (R-26)
- Larry Dunphy (R-88)
- Brian Duprey (R-39)
- Eleanor Espling (R-105)
- Joyce Ann Fitzpatrick (R-8)
- Jeffery Gifford (R-12)
- Stacey Guerin (R-22)
- Lance Harvell (R-89)
- Roger Jackson (R-100)
- Peter Johnson (R-27)
- Jonathan Kinney (R-99)
- Aaron Libby (R-139)
- Lawrence Lockman (R-30)
- Ricky Long (R-9)
- Michael McClellan (R-103)
- Carol McElwee (R-4)
- Melvin Newendyke (R-80)
- Jethro Pease (R-44)
- Anita Peavey Haskell (R-13)
- Roger Reed (R-23)
- Deborah Sanderson (R-52)
- Heather Sirocki (R-128)
- Jeffrey Timberlake (R-96)
- Beth Turner (R-11)
- Thomas Tyler (R-110)
- Windol Weaver (R-150)
- Stephen Wood (R-75)
Arguments
The Maine League of Women Voters listed the following as arguments in opposition to Question 5 in their voters' guide:[10]
“ |
|
” |
Media editorial positions
Support
- The Bangor Daily News said,
“ | In less than 15 years, the MDI Biological Laboratory has grown from a nine-employee, seasonal lab into a 63-employee, year-round operation performing cutting-edge research into tissue regeneration. A “yes” vote on Question 5 would allow the research lab in Salisbury Cove to expand by building a new, 3,000-square-foot research and training facility.
The $3 million bond allocation is a small investment with the potential for a major return, and it deserves voters’ support.[2] |
” |
—Bangor Daily News[11] |
- The Portland Press Herald said,
“ | This lab, too, has a solid track record. It has grown from 10 employees to 65 in the last 14 years, and it has attracted $106 million in federal grant money, while doing groundbreaking research in tissue regeneration, helping to fight disease and the effects of aging.
Both labs already raise millions in private funds to support their research, but federal support for research grants is dwindling, and money for new facilities is all but nonexistent. Public funding is necessary to give these projects a jump start.[2] |
” |
—Portland Press Herald[12] |
Opposition
- The Maine Current said,
“ | We don’t support Question 5, which would approve $3 million to modernize and expand a biotechnology lab somewhere in the state – the location of which is not disclosed – that would specialize in tissue repair and regeneration, as well as help train a biotech workforce. While this effort sounds noble, there is too little information included for residents to offer an educated vote.[2] | ” |
—Maine Current[13] |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Legislatively-referred state statute
According to Article IX, Section 14 of the Maine Constitution, a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the Maine Legislature was required to put bond issues before voters.
The Maine Senate and Maine House of Representatives passed SP 421 on April 17, 2014.[14]
Senate vote
April 17, 2014 Senate vote
Maine SP 421 Senate Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 26 | 81.25% | ||
No | 6 | 18.75% |
House vote
April 17, 2014 House vote
Maine SP 421 Assembly Vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 113 | 77.93% | ||
No | 32 | 22.07% |
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Maine Secretary of State, "Upcoming Elections: November 4, 2014 - General Election," accessed August 7, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Maine Legislature, "Public Law 568," April 26, 2014
- ↑ Maine Legislature, "LD 1223 LR 1291(02) Fiscal Note," April 17, 2014
- ↑ Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, "Upcoming Elections," accessed September 9, 2014
- ↑ Central Maine, "Bond issues deserve our support," October 22, 2014
- ↑ Bangor Daily News, "Where a Democrat, Republican agree: Innovation bonds are crucial to Maine’s future," October 22, 2014
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Open States, "Senate Vote on SP 421," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 OpenStates.org, "House Vote on SP 421," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 League of Women Voters of Maine, "Voter Guide for Maine General Election: November 4, 2014," accessed November 1, 2014
- ↑ Bangor Daily News, "Yes on Question 5: MDI lab offers a track record of good returns on Maine's investment," October 20, 2014
- ↑ Portland Press Herald, "Our View: R&D bonds necessary to reshape Maine’s economy," October 26, 2014
- ↑ Maine Current, "Editorial: A question of bonds," October 8, 2014
- ↑ Open States, "SP 421," accessed October 21, 2014
![]() |
State of Maine Augusta (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |