Majority-minority districts

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Election Policy Logo.png

Redistricting
State-by-state
redistricting procedures
Majority-minority districts
Congressional district demographics
Public Policy Logo-one line.png

A majority-minority district is a district in which a racial minority group or groups comprise a majority of the district's total population. As of 2015, the United States was home to 122 congressional majority-minority districts. This represented approximately 28 percent of the nation's 435 House districts.[1][2][3][4][5]

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act mandates that no "standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color." In the context of redistricting, federal law provides that majority-minority districts can be created in order to prevent the dilution of minorities' voting strength in compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Thornburg v. Gingles, a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1986, established a three-part test for proving whether vote dilution in violation of the Voting Rights Act has occurred in a district or districts.[6]

Background

See also: Voting Rights Act

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 mandates that electoral district lines cannot be drawn in such a manner as to "improperly dilute minorities' voting power."[7]

No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.[8]
—Voting Rights Act of 1965[9]

Federal law permits states and other political subdivisions to create majority-minority districts in order to comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.[10]

Thornburg v. Gingles

See also: Thornburg v. Gingles

In 1982, the North Carolina state legislature approved redistricting plans for the North Carolina State Senate and the North Carolina House of Representatives. The maps were challenged in United States District Court. The challengers alleged that the new maps "impaired black citizens' ability to elect representatives of their choice in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act." The district court ruled that six legislative districts violated the Voting Rights Act "by diluting the power of the black vote." The decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.[11][12][13]

On June 30, 1986, the high court ruled unanimously in Thornburg v. Gingles that five of the aforementioned six districts "discriminated against blacks by diluting the power of their collective vote." Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., wrote the majority opinion, which largely upheld the district court's original ruling.[11][12][13]

The District Court in this case carefully considered the totality of the circumstances and found that in each district racially polarized voting; the legacy of official discrimination in voting matters, education, housing, employment, and health services; and the persistence of campaign appeals to racial prejudice acted in concert with the multimember districting scheme to impair the ability of geographically insular and politically cohesive groups of black voters to participate equally in the political process and to elect candidates of their choice.[8]
—Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

In Thornburg v. Gingles, the court also established three criteria that must be met in order "to prove claims of vote dilution under section 2 [of the Voting Rights Act]:"[11][12][13]

  1. "The minority group must be able to demonstrate that it is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district."
  2. "The minority group must be able to show that it is politically cohesive."
  3. "The minority must be able to demonstrate that the white majority votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it usually to defeat the minority’s preferred candidate."

Majority-minority districts in 2015

The table below provides demographic data for each majority-minority district in the United States as of 2015. This was the most recent data available as of June 2017. For the purposes of this article, a majority-minority district is defined as any district in which a minority group or collection of minority groups comprise a simple majority of the district's population.

In 2015, there were 122 majority-minority districts spanning 26 states. California was home to 40 such districts, more than any other state. See the table below for further details.[5]

Majority-minority districts in the United States, 2015
District Hispanic or Latino White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander Other Multiple
races
Representative's
party
(2015)
District 7, Alabama 3.20% 31.41% 63.38% 0.13% 0.72% 0.15% 0.17% 0.84% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, Arizona 22.87% 48.34% 2.29% 22.64% 1.65% 0.10% 0.09% 2.02% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 3, Arizona 60.01% 29.06% 4.47% 3.34% 1.58% 0.07% 0.06% 1.42% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Arizona 62.80% 21.45% 9.59% 2.39% 2.14% 0.20% 0.08% 1.36% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 10, California 42.75% 42.93% 3.05% 0.39% 6.84% 0.66% 0.09% 3.29% Ends.png Republican
District 11, California 27.23% 46.10% 8.27% 0.24% 13.74% 0.43% 0.36% 3.63% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 12, California 14.93% 43.29% 5.14% 0.15% 32.23% 0.39% 0.28% 3.58% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 13, California 22.39% 34.97% 16.83% 0.34% 20.12% 0.44% 0.39% 4.53% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 14, California 24.33% 34.09% 2.80% 0.13% 33.31% 1.32% 0.33% 3.71% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 15, California 22.16% 32.56% 5.88% 0.27% 33.50% 1.12% 0.09% 4.42% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 16, California 60.44% 22.31% 4.82% 0.56% 9.55% 0.23% 0.10% 1.99% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 17, California 16.19% 24.69% 2.39% 0.19% 52.78% 0.83% 0.16% 2.77% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 19, California 41.34% 25.18% 2.80% 0.19% 26.79% 0.32% 0.32% 3.06% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 20, California 52.95% 36.82% 1.61% 0.27% 5.05% 0.28% 0.14% 2.88% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 21, California 74.73% 16.96% 3.66% 0.50% 2.96% 0.14% 0.02% 1.03% Ends.png Republican
District 22, California 46.72% 40.09% 3.30% 0.35% 7.22% 0.08% 0.12% 2.11% Ends.png Republican
District 23, California 37.66% 47.09% 6.72% 0.39% 5.18% 0.16% 0.08% 2.72% Ends.png Republican
District 25, California 37.23% 42.78% 7.99% 0.21% 8.97% 0.04% 0.18% 2.60% Ends.png Republican
District 26, California 44.99% 43.62% 1.71% 0.25% 6.95% 0.20% 0.18% 2.11% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 27, California 27.95% 26.43% 4.56% 0.19% 37.90% 0.21% 0.36% 2.42% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 29, California 68.83% 18.44% 3.76% 0.08% 7.58% 0.06% 0.19% 1.05% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 3, California 30.03% 47.41% 6.09% 0.61% 10.77% 0.35% 0.14% 4.60% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 30, California 28.93% 49.87% 4.21% 0.19% 13.12% 0.12% 0.64% 2.92% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 31, California 51.77% 27.14% 10.22% 0.26% 7.83% 0.51% 0.21% 2.05% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 32, California 63.35% 16.28% 1.73% 0.19% 16.79% 0.16% 0.17% 1.31% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 34, California 64.16% 10.27% 4.55% 0.21% 19.23% 0.09% 0.18% 1.30% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 35, California 71.51% 13.03% 5.94% 0.21% 6.97% 0.12% 0.18% 2.05% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 36, California 49.85% 40.16% 4.44% 0.60% 3.09% 0.17% 0.10% 1.59% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 37, California 38.07% 25.24% 23.35% 0.12% 9.71% 0.18% 0.42% 2.91% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 38, California 62.48% 16.40% 3.67% 0.31% 15.27% 0.23% 0.27% 1.36% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 39, California 34.92% 29.97% 1.69% 0.25% 30.84% 0.09% 0.08% 2.16% Ends.png Republican
District 40, California 87.62% 4.90% 4.48% 0.11% 2.47% 0.07% 0.08% 0.26% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 41, California 57.98% 25.05% 9.07% 0.27% 5.08% 0.36% 0.07% 2.12% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 42, California 38.11% 42.75% 4.90% 0.35% 10.01% 0.25% 0.08% 3.56% Ends.png Republican
District 43, California 48.31% 13.47% 22.29% 0.11% 12.54% 0.48% 0.39% 2.42% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 44, California 69.43% 6.77% 14.78% 0.34% 6.58% 0.89% 0.15% 1.06% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 46, California 67.28% 17.54% 1.79% 0.13% 11.88% 0.30% 0.16% 0.91% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 47, California 36.28% 30.59% 6.84% 0.62% 21.93% 0.90% 0.15% 2.68% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 5, California 27.86% 49.63% 5.73% 0.32% 11.53% 0.44% 0.47% 4.01% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 51, California 70.56% 13.06% 5.61% 0.39% 8.70% 0.20% 0.02% 1.47% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 53, California 34.19% 39.27% 9.02% 0.19% 12.49% 0.55% 0.39% 3.90% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 6, California 29.50% 36.55% 11.88% 0.38% 15.12% 1.22% 0.49% 4.86% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 8, California 39.23% 46.10% 7.63% 0.89% 2.86% 0.31% 0.16% 2.81% Ends.png Republican
District 9, California 37.59% 35.17% 8.68% 0.18% 14.03% 0.52% 0.18% 3.66% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 14, Florida 29.61% 39.93% 25.11% 0.18% 2.41% 0.08% 0.41% 2.27% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 20, Florida 21.84% 21.24% 52.67% 0.15% 1.90% 0.01% 0.48% 1.71% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 23, Florida 39.73% 43.44% 10.89% 0.17% 3.93% 0.07% 0.37% 1.40% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 24, Florida 32.41% 11.83% 52.58% 0.02% 1.88% 0.00% 0.28% 1.01% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 25, Florida 70.93% 21.16% 4.99% 0.12% 2.05% 0.00% 0.25% 0.50% Ends.png Republican
District 26, Florida 69.65% 18.66% 9.16% 0.05% 1.73% 0.00% 0.19% 0.57% Ends.png Republican
District 27, Florida 75.43% 15.14% 6.84% 0.03% 1.56% 0.00% 0.32% 0.66% Ends.png Republican
District 5, Florida 14.30% 31.54% 49.02% 0.28% 2.40% 0.13% 0.28% 2.07% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 9, Florida 48.74% 34.39% 10.51% 0.03% 4.03% 0.04% 0.69% 1.57% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 13, Georgia 11.96% 26.54% 57.53% 0.02% 2.38% 0.00% 0.16% 1.41% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Georgia 5.18% 39.87% 52.13% 0.19% 1.00% 0.10% 0.08% 1.46% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, Georgia 9.67% 24.60% 58.66% 0.08% 4.84% 0.00% 0.47% 1.69% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 5, Georgia 6.30% 29.34% 57.51% 0.18% 4.57% 0.03% 0.44% 1.63% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Georgia 18.30% 45.62% 20.02% 0.11% 12.96% 0.08% 0.39% 2.51% Ends.png Republican
District 1, Hawaii 8.41% 16.77% 2.30% 0.07% 48.29% 6.80% 0.13% 17.24% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Hawaii 12.31% 28.63% 1.56% 0.24% 24.34% 10.68% 0.11% 22.15% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, Illinois 9.90% 35.64% 50.62% 0.14% 1.73% 0.02% 0.19% 1.76% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Illinois 13.26% 28.49% 56.04% 0.05% 0.75% 0.00% 0.19% 1.23% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, Illinois 70.09% 21.88% 3.48% 0.11% 3.40% 0.03% 0.14% 0.87% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Illinois 14.12% 28.06% 48.50% 0.14% 7.65% 0.00% 0.10% 1.44% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Louisiana 6.30% 28.80% 59.88% 0.19% 3.03% 0.00% 0.26% 1.54% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, Maryland 15.45% 26.41% 52.09% 0.18% 3.47% 0.01% 0.28% 2.11% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 5, Maryland 8.68% 46.00% 37.05% 0.16% 4.17% 0.04% 0.48% 3.42% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Maryland 3.36% 32.76% 53.63% 0.19% 7.30% 0.06% 0.30% 2.41% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Massachusetts 21.90% 40.46% 24.44% 0.09% 10.04% 0.01% 0.84% 2.22% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 13, Michigan 7.12% 34.12% 55.26% 0.25% 1.35% 0.05% 0.32% 1.52% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 14, Michigan 4.82% 31.99% 55.89% 0.22% 4.57% 0.03% 0.30% 2.18% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Mississippi 1.89% 30.34% 66.29% 0.24% 0.69% 0.00% 0.05% 0.49% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, Missouri 3.63% 41.18% 48.97% 0.09% 3.05% 0.08% 0.13% 2.86% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, Nevada 46.70% 30.69% 9.73% 0.37% 8.46% 0.58% 0.38% 3.09% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, Nevada 27.89% 47.10% 14.20% 0.73% 5.68% 0.51% 0.17% 3.73% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 10, New Jersey 20.78% 20.34% 48.70% 0.10% 7.51% 0.02% 1.06% 1.50% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 12, New Jersey 17.06% 47.09% 17.44% 0.09% 16.44% 0.00% 0.55% 1.32% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 6, New Jersey 21.54% 47.39% 10.08% 0.16% 18.85% 0.03% 0.23% 1.72% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 8, New Jersey 55.00% 25.12% 9.09% 0.14% 8.21% 0.05% 0.94% 1.44% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 9, New Jersey 36.52% 38.26% 9.40% 0.11% 14.06% 0.03% 0.18% 1.43% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, New Mexico 49.38% 40.14% 2.37% 3.70% 2.22% 0.04% 0.21% 1.94% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, New Mexico 53.77% 37.30% 1.91% 4.92% 0.75% 0.02% 0.13% 1.19% Ends.png Republican
District 3, New Mexico 40.80% 37.40% 1.71% 16.99% 1.01% 0.06% 0.18% 1.86% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 13, New York 54.43% 14.81% 24.00% 0.03% 4.20% 0.05% 0.25% 2.22% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 14, New York 47.52% 23.04% 9.70% 0.15% 17.62% 0.03% 0.48% 1.46% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 15, New York 66.05% 3.13% 27.62% 0.28% 1.72% 0.00% 0.37% 0.84% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 16, New York 24.85% 37.29% 30.38% 0.12% 5.00% 0.02% 1.04% 1.31% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 5, New York 21.14% 10.40% 47.15% 0.23% 13.72% 0.01% 4.65% 2.70% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 6, New York 18.57% 34.31% 3.81% 0.16% 40.15% 0.01% 0.67% 2.32% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, New York 40.54% 30.96% 7.44% 0.14% 18.47% 0.03% 0.69% 1.74% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 8, New York 17.92% 23.81% 50.08% 0.18% 6.01% 0.02% 0.51% 1.48% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 9, New York 12.37% 31.18% 47.24% 0.05% 6.77% 0.00% 0.47% 1.92% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, North Carolina 8.84% 34.72% 52.03% 0.69% 1.54% 0.06% 0.06% 2.06% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 12, North Carolina 14.05% 28.75% 48.89% 0.34% 5.15% 0.01% 0.39% 2.43% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, North Carolina 12.13% 47.63% 30.85% 0.50% 6.07% 0.09% 0.33% 2.41% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 11, Ohio 4.54% 37.59% 52.21% 0.22% 2.61% 0.01% 0.19% 2.62% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 1, Pennsylvania 17.20% 39.47% 33.54% 0.06% 7.48% 0.00% 0.19% 2.07% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Pennsylvania 6.17% 29.34% 56.36% 0.29% 5.00% 0.09% 0.51% 2.24% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 6, South Carolina 4.96% 34.53% 57.18% 0.16% 1.00% 0.04% 0.13% 2.00% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 9, Tennessee 7.21% 24.34% 64.75% 0.06% 1.89% 0.07% 0.26% 1.43% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 15, Texas 80.59% 15.91% 1.91% 0.03% 1.05% 0.03% 0.07% 0.41% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 16, Texas 79.47% 14.24% 3.71% 0.25% 1.40% 0.00% 0.19% 0.75% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 18, Texas 42.69% 16.20% 36.00% 0.17% 3.88% 0.01% 0.28% 0.77% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 2, Texas 30.13% 48.09% 11.59% 0.17% 7.95% 0.02% 0.32% 1.75% Ends.png Republican
District 20, Texas 67.81% 21.86% 5.47% 0.13% 2.88% 0.15% 0.07% 1.62% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 22, Texas 24.96% 41.34% 13.23% 0.32% 17.97% 0.01% 0.22% 1.95% Ends.png Republican
District 23, Texas 69.73% 24.67% 2.93% 0.34% 1.46% 0.01% 0.06% 0.80% Ends.png Republican
District 24, Texas 24.61% 48.41% 9.90% 0.27% 13.52% 0.29% 0.35% 2.65% Ends.png Republican
District 27, Texas 52.46% 39.96% 4.84% 0.21% 1.51% 0.05% 0.05% 0.93% Ends.png Republican
District 28, Texas 78.20% 15.92% 3.64% 0.11% 1.06% 0.00% 0.13% 0.94% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 29, Texas 77.29% 9.59% 10.79% 0.10% 1.57% 0.03% 0.04% 0.58% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 30, Texas 39.09% 14.87% 43.12% 0.15% 1.55% 0.01% 0.03% 1.18% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 32, Texas 25.96% 49.94% 13.43% 0.21% 7.73% 0.01% 0.14% 2.57% Ends.png Republican
District 33, Texas 67.03% 13.98% 16.11% 0.14% 1.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.78% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 34, Texas 83.03% 14.71% 1.20% 0.14% 0.60% 0.01% 0.05% 0.25% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 35, Texas 63.07% 25.44% 8.03% 0.12% 1.75% 0.02% 0.20% 1.36% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 7, Texas 31.15% 44.66% 11.93% 0.03% 10.26% 0.02% 0.27% 1.69% Ends.png Republican
District 9, Texas 38.28% 10.87% 37.67% 0.11% 11.93% 0.09% 0.19% 0.86% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 11, Virginia 18.02% 45.93% 12.94% 0.13% 18.14% 0.03% 0.31% 4.50% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 3, Virginia 5.93% 31.80% 56.50% 0.36% 1.73% 0.08% 0.35% 3.25% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 9, Washington 12.67% 47.17% 10.73% 0.44% 22.12% 1.48% 0.12% 5.26% Electiondot.png Democratic
District 4, Wisconsin 16.88% 43.12% 33.13% 0.43% 3.72% 0.02% 0.12% 2.57% Electiondot.png Democratic
Source: United States Census Bureau, "American Fact Finder: 2015 1-year estimates," accessed May 23, 2017

Historical information

2013

The table below provides demographic data about each majority-minority district in the United States as of 2013. Information about the partisan affiliation of each district's representative dates to 2015. Click "[show]" on the table below to see the complete data set.

Support and opposition

Support

Proponents of majority-minority districts argue that these districts are a necessary hindrance to the practice of cracking, which occurs when a constituency is divided between several districts in order to prevent it from achieving a majority in any one district. In an April 2015 report for the Congressional Research Service, legislative attorney L. Paige Whitaker described this argument as follows:[6]

A majority-minority district is one in which a racial or language minority group comprises a voting majority. The creation of such districts can avoid racial vote dilution by preventing the submergence of minority voters into the majority, which can deny minority voters the opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice.[8]
—L. Paige Whitaker

In addition, supporters argue that the drawing of majority-minority districts has resulted in an increased number of minority representatives in state legislatures and Congress. The American Civil Liberties Union, in a 2001 report, made this argument:[1][2][3][14]

In 1964, there were only about 300 black elected officials nationwide. By 1998 the number had grown to more than 8,858. This increase is the direct result of the increase in majority-minority districts since passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. ... Given the persistent patterns of racial bloc voting in the South, the destruction of majority-minority districts, whether at the congressional or state and local levels, would inevitable lead to a decline in the number of minority office holders.[8]
American Civil Liberties Union

Opposition

Critics contend that the establishment of majority-minority districts can result in packing, which occurs when a constituency or voting group is placed within a single district, thereby minimizing its influence in other districts. Kim Soffen, writing for The Washington Post in June 2016, summarized this argument as follows:[15]

Imagine the minority-favored candidate can win an election in a district if at least 30 percent of voters are minorities. What harm is done by the legislators packing the district up to 50 percent minority voters? Much like political gerrymandering, it limits black influence in surrounding districts. It would require the creation of, for instance, a 50 percent and a 10 percent black district, rather than two 30 percent black districts. In other words, the requirement would give black voters one representative of their choice rather than two.[8]
—Kim Soffen

Critics argue that, because minority groups tend to vote Democratic, majority-minority districts ultimately present an unfair advantage to Republicans by consolidating Democratic votes into a smaller number of districts. Steven Hill, writing for The Atlantic in June 2013, made the following argument:[1][2][3]

The drawing of majority-minority districts not only elected more minorities, it also had the effect of bleeding minority voters out of all the surrounding districts. Given that minority voters were the most reliably Democratic voters, that made all of the neighboring districts more Republican. The black, Latino, and Asian representatives mostly were replacing white Democrats, and the increase in minority representation was coming at the expense of electing fewer Democrats.[8]
—Steven Hill

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Majority minority districts. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Indy Week, "Cracked, stacked and packed: Initial redistricting maps met with skepticism and dismay," June 29, 2011
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 The Atlantic, "How the Voting Rights Act Hurts Democrats and Minorities," June 17, 2013
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Redrawing the Lines, "The Role of Section 2 - Majority Minority Districts," accessed April 6, 2015
  4. United States Census Bureau, "2009-2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates," accessed April 8, 2015
  5. 5.0 5.1 United States Census Bureau, "American Fact Finder: 2015 1-year estimates," accessed May 23, 2017
  6. 6.0 6.1 Congressional Research Service, "Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview," April 13, 2015
  7. Legal Information Institute, "Voting Rights Act," accessed June 19, 2017
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  9. Yale Law School, The Avalon Project, "Voting Rights Act of 1965; August 6, 1965," accessed April 6, 2015
  10. Justice.gov, "Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act," accessed July 21, 2015
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, "Thornburg v. Gingles," accessed May 20, 2015
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Racial and Ethnic Tensions in American Communities: Poverty, Inequality, and Discrimination—Volume VII: The Mississippi Delta Report, "Chapter 3–Voting Rights and Political Representation in the Mississippi Delta," accessed May 20, 2015
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Justia.com, "Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986)," June 30, 1986
  14. American Civil LIberties Union, "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Redistricting," April 2001
  15. The Washington Post, "How racial gerrymandering deprives black people of political power," June 9, 2016