Margot Herzl

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Margot Herzl
Image of Margot Herzl
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

Metropolitan State University of Denver, 2016

Personal
Birthplace
Anchorage, Alaska
Contact

Margot Herzl (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the Colorado House of Representatives to represent District 22. She lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Herzl completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Margot Herzl was born in Anchorage, Alaska. She received a bachelor's degree from Metropolitan State University of Denver in 2016. Herzl's professional experience includes working as an administrator in a pediatric dental office and as a private music instruction. She homeschooled her four children.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: Colorado House of Representatives elections, 2020

General election

General election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22

Incumbent Colin Larson defeated Mary Parker and Margot Herzl in the general election for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Colin Larson
Colin Larson (R)
 
51.3
 
26,421
Image of Mary Parker
Mary Parker (D) Candidate Connection
 
45.5
 
23,467
Image of Margot Herzl
Margot Herzl (L) Candidate Connection
 
3.2
 
1,641

Total votes: 51,529
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22

Mary Parker advanced from the Democratic primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 30, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Mary Parker
Mary Parker Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
12,464

Total votes: 12,464
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22

Incumbent Colin Larson defeated Justin Everett in the Republican primary for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on June 30, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Colin Larson
Colin Larson
 
56.2
 
6,760
Image of Justin Everett
Justin Everett
 
43.8
 
5,266

Total votes: 12,026
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Libertarian convention

Libertarian convention for Colorado House of Representatives District 22

Margot Herzl advanced from the Libertarian convention for Colorado House of Representatives District 22 on April 13, 2020.

Candidate
Image of Margot Herzl
Margot Herzl (L) Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Margot Herzl completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Herzl's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am Margot Herzl. I live in unincorporated Jefferson County Colorado with my husband, and our four children whom I raise and homeschool. I am a mother, a wife, and a patriot. I unapologetically support the American Founding, and American Liberty.

My independent study of political and philosophical topics has led to my involvement in local politics, and in the Colorado Libertarian Party. I have served on the board of the Jefferson County LP Affiliate since its founding in April, 2019, first as Secretary, and currently as Vice Chair.

I graduated Summa Cum Laude in 2016 with a degree in Linguistics from the Metropolitan State University of Denver, and have spent most of my life in and around the Denver area. I worked 12 years as a private music instructor, and nearly 10 years as an administrator in a pediatric dental office.
  • Stop with the Crazy! We must all be able to speak openly with one another if we are ever to have a hope of being on the same page.
  • Extend others the courtesy of assuming that they are motivated by a desire to make a better world, even (especially) when you disagree with them.
  • It seems that Colorado law-makers are constantly struggling against our State and Federal Constitutions, rather than trying to uphold them. We need more accountability for our political leaders.
Liberty is my underlying drive in all things. I want to protect your freedom, and give it back to you where it has been taken away. I feel this most strongly in the areas of Education and Business Regulation, but in all things I want to make sure the government is not standing in the way of your success.

I also have an interest in long-term budgetary planning, and in fiscal and monetary policy more generally. We must learn to live within our means, so that citizens can make realistic, informed choices about their own lives, and so that our government is unshakably prepared to deal with disasters when they occur. If we borrow to the hilt and throw money around in good times, we have no safety net to fall back on when times get tough.
I am inspired by many people, both living and dead, but first and foremost by Thomas Sowell. https://www.tsowell.com/

Like me, he started his political life believing that government was the answer to all of society's problems, but his persistent devotion to the truth finally led him to the understanding that the best way to make the world a better place is to leave individuals free to work towards making their own lives better, without onerous government interventions distorting and perverting natural human interactions and natural incentives.

I admire not only his commitment to truth and reason, his commitment to doing good within the parameters that reality has set - but also the courage he has displayed throughout his lifetime. He speaks the truth, again and again, regardless of whether our political class or wants to hear it, and regardless of whether his words make a measurable difference in alleviating society's ills. He has never given up, and I draw much of my own steel from Thomas Sowell's tenacity and commitment, and from the tenacity of other like-minded individuals.
Well, I think that my own political principles are the most important characteristics for an elected official to have! So let me tell you what those are :)

I believe that no one can tell you how to live better than you can, and that the government's job is to protect your unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, while leaving you free to be the architect of your own destiny.

I believe that the ends of human existence "consist in happiness," and that "happiness consists in virtue," as stated by John Adams (who in turn quoted Aristotle). I believe that there are many valid ideas of what virtue looks like, and as many versions of happiness as there are people. Therefore all people should be free to choose the path that they believe will lead them to a happy life.

I believe in the non-aggression principle: that there is never a valid justification for initiating force against a non-aggressor, and particularly against an innocent.

I believe in voluntarism, which means that none should be forced into a social or legal contract/exchange against their will, nor barred from any such contract or exchange into which they have entered voluntarily.

I believe in the separation of church and state, by which I mean that the institutions which are typically responsible for moral teaching, such as (but not limited to) the family and the church, cannot be permitted to make laws - and that the institution which makes our laws, meaning the government, must not engage in moral teaching.

Finally, it is critical that elected officials keep an open dialogue with their constituents. They must take care to understand the concerns that their voters raise, and take the time to explain their own reasoning and decisions.
I would like to leave behind a world that is more free, in which people know and feel that they have permission to pursue the life that they want, rather than the life others think they should have. And I want to leave behind a world in which people can stand tall and have pride in the things that make them good and great; a world in which people will not be punished, ignored, or resented for their successes, but rather shall be applauded for their triumphs, and respected for the challenges they have overcome along the way.
If I could be anyone, anyone at all, fictional or otherwise...I would choose to be myself.

I know this isn't really an answer in the spirit of the question, so I'll add peripherally that I think Iron Man is pretty great :)

But really, truly, I choose myself and my own life. I choose this time to live, and the struggles that come with it. I choose the life I have led and the sometimes painful lessons it has taught me. I have thought (and felt) carefully regarding what I want, I have seen that I can achieve it, and I have aligned my actions with manifesting the person I want to be, and the life I want to lead, into the world. I can see my steps carrying me forward on my chosen path a tiny bit each and every day.

That is the definition of happiness.
I think it is important to have BOTH legislators with previous experience, AND legislators who can bring a fresh view. If politicians serve for too long, they can become too used to the status quo, and too devoted to keeping their jobs over serving the interests of their constituents. Therefore you need frequent "fresh blood," as it were. However, it is also important to have people who are knowledgeable about the system, and used to/aware of its rules and restrictions; you need people who are aware of the long-term arcs that have been put in place; you need experienced politicians to teach the newbies how to do the job.

I also think it is important to have legislators from all walks of life - parenting, military, private enterprise, wage-labor, education, and government all bring different experiences and specialized knowledge to the table, and you need a healthy mix from all of those backgrounds in order for the legislature to stay in-touch with the everyday experience of the American people.

I support term limits for politicians at every level of government - though I am unsure exactly what form those limits should take.
Absolutely.

While I do not approve of legislators trading favors or votes for any reason - and I believe that personal relationships can lead to this temptation - it is crucial for legislators to understand one another, and to work together to identify real problems and real solutions. This means deep and frank conversation, sometimes on inflammatory and sensitive topics. These conversations are very hard to have honestly with people with whom you disagree - unless you have first taken the time to gain respect for one another as well-meaning human beings.

Every legislator was chosen by their constituents, so each is bringing something to the table that part of the citizenry finds important. Legislators should take the time to understand what public concerns are embodied by the election of their fellows, and try to find common ground with them.
Yes.
I believe that the particular talents I have to offer my fellow man are best realized through government service, and I am unsure yet exactly which government role would be the best fit for me. I am interested in exploring other legislative and executive roles as opportunities for that present themselves. I would also love the opportunity to serve Coloradans at the Federal level in the future.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on June 7, 2020


Current members of the Colorado House of Representatives
Leadership
Speaker of the House:Julie McCluskie
Majority Leader:Monica Duran
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
Vacant
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
Dan Woog (R)
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
Ty Winter (R)
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
Democratic Party (43)
Republican Party (21)
Vacancies (1)