Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Massachusetts Question 2, Repeal Competency Assessment Requirement for High School Graduation Initiative (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Special state legislative • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • Municipal • How to run for office
Flag of Massachusetts.png


Massachusetts Question 2
Flag of Massachusetts.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Education
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens

Massachusetts Question 2, the Repeal Competency Assessment Requirement for High School Graduation Initiative, was on the ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute on November 5, 2024.[1][2] The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported repealing the requirement that students must achieve a certain competency level on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam to graduate high school.

A "no" vote opposed repealing the requirement that students must achieve a certain competency level on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam to graduate high school.


Election results

See also: Results for education and school choice ballot measures, 2024

Massachusetts Question 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

2,004,216 59.07%
No 1,388,560 40.93%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Question 2 change about the statewide assessment to graduate high school?

See also: Text of measure

Question 2 repealed the requirement that students must achieve a certain competency level on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam to graduate high school. The initiative required that students participate in the assessment program without achieving a certain competency level and complete all local or district graduation requirements.[1]

Did any other states have similar statewide assessment requirements?

See also: Statewide assessment requirements for high school graduation

For the graduating class of 2023, eight states (Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, Texas, Virginia, and Wyoming) required students to pass a statewide assessment to graduate high school according to Fair Test: The National Center for Fair and Open Testing.[3]

Who supported and opposed Question 2?

See also: Support and Opposition

Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes led the campaign in support of the initiative. The campaign received $16.4 million, including $15.2 million from the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA). The MTA stated, "Massachusetts residents are ready to join the vast majority of states that have scrapped the use of standardized tests as a graduation requirement and instead use authentic, educator-designed assessments of student skills. The MCAS will still be taken, as is required by federal law, but it will be used for diagnostic purposes, and not as a high-stakes test required for earning a diploma."[4][5]

Protect Our Kids' Future: Vote No on 2 registered in opposition to Question 2. The committee reported $5.4 million in contributions. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was the largest donor, contributing $2.5 million. The Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education, which opposed the initiative, said, "Importantly, we know from Brown University research that ‘high school MCAS scores predict long-term success and appear to reflect students’ academic skills,’ not simply socio-economic status or school characteristics …. We can’t eliminate gaps in achievement and equity if we strip ourselves of the tools to measure them. Instead of wasting time fighting for legislation that does away with the graduation standard, a true commitment to equity requires we focus squarely on helping all students meet it."[6][4]

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[7]

Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?[8]

Ballot summary

The final ballot summary for Question 2 was as follows.[7]

This proposed law would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests (or other statewide or district-wide assessments) in mathematics, science and technology, and English in order to receive a high school diploma. Instead, in order for a student to receive a high school diploma, the proposed law would require the student to complete coursework certified by the student’s district as demonstrating mastery of the competencies contained in the state academic standards in mathematics, science and technology, and English, as well as any additional areas determined by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.[8]

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure is below:[1]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 11, and the FRE is 59. The word count for the ballot title is 24.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 27, and the FRE is -5. The word count for the ballot summary is 101.


Support

Yes on 2 MA 2024.png

Committee to Eliminate Barriers to Student Success for All led the Yes on 2 campaign in support of the initiative.[5]

Supporters

Officials

Unions

  • Massachusetts AFL-CIO
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association

Organizations

  • MassVote
  • Progressive Massachusetts

Arguments

  • Massachusetts Teachers Association President Max Page: "Massachusetts residents are ready to join the vast majority of states that have scrapped the use of standardized tests as a graduation requirement and instead use authentic, educator-designed assessments of student skills. The MCAS will still be taken, as is required by federal law, but it will be used for diagnostic purposes, and not as a high-stakes test required for earning a diploma."
  • Massachusetts AFL-CIO President Chrissy Lynch: "Like tens of thousands of union members in Massachusetts, I am a parent with children in public schools who sees firsthand the effects of high-stakes testing on students’ learning environments. All children deserve a comprehensive education. Making MCAS a high-stakes exam has narrowed the curriculum and made it more difficult for educators to tailor lessons to the needs of students."
  • U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan (D): "As a proud Lowell Public Schools graduate and the parent of two girls in public schools, I know we must do everything in our power to help students and educators succeed in the classroom. While MCAS is an important part of the equation when it comes to measuring students’ growth, its use as a one-size-fits-all graduation requirement leaves hundreds of the most vulnerable in our schools behind each year, many of whom are in gateway cities like the ones I represent. I strongly believe that more resources and services must be allocated to schools to help those students succeed, and I plan to vote for Question 2 to ensure that, in the meantime, students who meet academic and attendance requirements to graduate but struggle to pass all three MCAS exams don’t have their futures upended by being denied a diploma."
  • Shelley Scruggs Parent Volunteer Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA): "A Yes on Question 2 gives all students the opportunity to thrive and reach their full potential. We all agree that high standards help keep our public schools great, and assessments are needed to ensure that students master the knowledge and skills to succeed in life after high school. However, the MCAS is a one-size-fits-all exam that fails to measure other student achievement measures such as GPA, coursework, and teacher assessments in determining if a student is allowed to graduate. Replacing the MCAS graduation requirement with more comprehensive measures will allow teachers to stop teaching to a test and unburden students from a make-or-break standardized test. Voting Yes will allow schools and teachers, together with parents and students, to focus on the most important skills and knowledge to help students succeed in life, rather than having to focus on only those skills that can be measured on a standardized test.”


Opposition

No on 2 MA 2024.jpeg

Protect Our Kids' Future: Vote No on 2 led the campaign in opposition to Question 2.[9]

Opponents

Officials

Former Officials

  • Former Secretary of Education Jim Peyser (Nonpartisan)

Organizations

  • Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce
  • Massachusetts Association of School Superintenents
  • Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education
  • Massachusetts Business Roundtable
  • Massachusetts Restaurant Association
  • NAIOP Massachusetts
  • Pioneer Institute

Arguments

  • Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education: "Importantly, we know from Brown University research that ‘high school MCAS scores predict long-term success and appear to reflect students’ academic skills,’ not simply socio-economic status or school characteristics …. We can’t eliminate gaps in achievement and equity if we strip ourselves of the tools to measure them. Instead of wasting time fighting for legislation that does away with the graduation standard, a true commitment to equity requires we focus squarely on helping all students meet it."
  • Former Secretary of Education Jim Peyser: "Without a baseline graduation standard and a valid and reliable way to measure student achievement, we can’t fulfill MERA’s most basic promise. And if we back away from MCAS as the statewide yardstick, it will lead to every district establishing its own standards, or none at all, which is exactly why Massachusetts enacted education reform in the first place."
  • Protect Our Kids’ Future: No on Question 2 campaign: "Teaching to the test is a myth. According to the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, statewide testing accounts for approximately 1 percent of class time each year. Even if proponents are to be believed, current state assessments cover basic English, math, and science: knowledge and skills that every student should be taught before graduating high school. If students haven’t mastered these subjects, statewide assessments ensure that they receive extra help to get caught up before graduating, so they can succeed in college or career."
  • Protect Our Kids’ Future: Vote No on 2: "Question 2 is unfair to kids and will increase inequality. Some school districts will just adopt lower standards so students “graduate” even if they haven’t learned the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It’s not fair to grant diplomas to kids who aren’t yet ready to graduate. If students cannot pass basic assessments in math, English, or science, we adults should do the hard work to get them up to speed. Instead of supporting kids, Question 2 would abandon them. Question 2 would remove our only statewide graduation standard. Massachusetts would have less rigorous high school graduation requirements than Mississippi and Alabama. Question 2 is a radical and untested proposal and should be rejected. Significant changes to our education system should be carefully studied, designed, and implemented by experts to ensure these policies are actually better for our kids. Vote No on Question 2.”


Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2024.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Massachusetts ballot measures

One committee registered in support of Question 2—Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes. One committee registered in opposition to Question 2—Protect Our Kids' Future: Vote No on 2.[5]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $950,000.00 $15,600,360.49 $16,550,360.49 $950,000.00 $16,550,360.49
Oppose $5,318,307.02 $93,763.81 $5,412,070.83 $5,011,106.57 $5,104,870.38
Total $6,268,307.02 $15,694,124.30 $21,962,431.32 $5,961,106.57 $21,655,230.87

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.[5]

Committees in support of Question 2
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes $950,000.00 $15,600,360.49 $16,550,360.49 $950,000.00 $16,550,360.49
Total $950,000.00 $15,600,360.49 $16,550,360.49 $950,000.00 $16,550,360.49

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in support of the ballot measure.[5]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Massachusetts Teachers Association $0.00 $15,204,575.87 $15,204,575.87
National Education Association $500,000.00 $0.00 $500,000.00
American Federation of Teachers International $200,000.00 $0.00 $200,000.00
Massachusetts Teachers Association Independent Expenditure Political Action Committee $150,000.00 $0.00 $150,000.00
American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts AFL-CIO Solidarity Fund $50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00
Boston Teachers Union PAC $50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00

Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the ballot measure.[5]

Committees in opposition to Question 2
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Protect Our Kids' Future: Vote No on 2 $5,318,307.02 $93,763.81 $5,412,070.83 $5,011,106.57 $5,104,870.38
Total $5,318,307.02 $93,763.81 $5,412,070.83 $5,011,106.57 $5,104,870.38

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in opposition to the ballot measure.[5]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Michael R. Bloomberg $2,500,000.00 $0.00 $2,500,000.00
Jim Davis $250,000.00 $0.00 $250,000.00
Raymond Strata $200,000.00 $0.00 $200,000.00
State Street Corporation $200,000.00 $0.00 $200,000.00
Paul Sagan $150,000.00 $0.00 $150,000.00
David Peeler $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
Paul Edgerley $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
Richard Burnes $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
Robert Rivers $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00

Media editorials

See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial boards published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.


Opposition

The following media editorial boards published an editorial opposing the ballot measure:

  • Sentinel & Enterprise Editorial Board: "We don’t know how students who’ve missed a considerable amount of class time are any more qualified to graduate without having to pass a state standardized test, unless the bar for accomplishing that was considerably lowered. This testing crucible has vaulted Massachusetts students to international rankings that far exceed this country as a whole. That global and national distinction will certainly erode if this question passes."


Polls

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Massachusetts Question 2, Repeal Competency Assessment Requirement for High School Graduation Initiative (2024)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Emerson College Polling/WHDH 10/24/2024-10/26/2024 1,000 RV ± 3.0% 54% 41% 5%
Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 2, which would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests (or other statewide or district-wide assessments) in mathematics, science and technology, and English in order to receive a high school diploma?"
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB 10/03/2024-10/10/2024 700 RV ± 4.8% 53% 36% 11%
Question: "Question 2 - would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests in Mathematics, Science and Technology, and English in order to receive a high school diploma."
WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll 09/12/2024-09/18/2024 800 LV ± 4.1% 51% 34% 15%
Question: "There will be a question on the November 2024 ballot in Massachusetts regarding standardized testing. A yes vote would eliminate the requirement that students pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in order to graduate high school but still require students to complete coursework that meets state standards. A no vote would make no change to existing law. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this proposal?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Massachusetts state high school graduation requirements

A 1993 state law requires Massachusetts high school students enrolled in public schools, educational collaboratives, and special education schools to meet the Competency Determination (CD) standard by passing the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in grade 10. Students who do not pass the MCAS in grade 10 may take retests in grades 11 and 12. If a student does not meet the proficient level for English Language Arts and Math, an Educational Proficiency Plan (EPP) must be developed and fulfilled in order for the student to graduate. An EPP includes a review of the student's strengths and weaknesses from coursework and MCAS results, the courses the student will be taking in grades 11 and 12, and a regularly administered assessment to demonstrate the student is progressing toward proficiency in the subject matter.[10]

The chart below describes the competency determination requirements to graduate as part of the classes of 2024 and 2025.[10]

MCAS 2023 results

The chart below shows the results of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) for students in grade 10 in 2023. Click here to see a further breakdown of the results.[11]

Statewide assessment requirements for high school graduation

For the graduating class of 2023, eight states (Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, Texas, Virginia, and Wyoming) required students to pass a statewide assessment to graduate high school according to Fair Test: The National Center for Fair and Open Testing. Twenty-six (26) states have other assessments, such as a civics assessment, ACT/SAT, college and career readiness assessment, and/or end-of-course exams for certain subjects, required to graduate high school. Sixteen (16) states do not have any statewide assessment requirements to graduate.[3][12]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Massachusetts

The state process

In Massachusetts, the number of signatures required to qualify an indirect initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 3.5 percent of the votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. No more than one-quarter of the verified signatures on any petition can come from a single county. The process for initiated state statutes in Massachusetts is indirect, which means the legislature has a chance to approve initiatives with successful petitions directly without the measure going to the voters. A first round of signatures equal to 3 percent of the votes cast for governor is required to put an initiative before the legislature. A second round of signatures equal to 0.5 percent of the votes cast for governor in the last election is required to put the measure on the ballot if the legislature rejects or declines to act on a proposed initiated statute. Signatures for initiated statutes in Massachusetts are collected in two circulation periods. The first period runs from the third Wednesday in September to two weeks prior to the first Wednesday in December, a period of nine weeks. If the proposed law is not adopted by the first Wednesday of May, petitioners then have until the first Wednesday of July (eight weeks) to request additional petition forms and submit the second round of signatures.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2024 ballot:

If enough signatures are submitted in the first round, the legislature must act on a successful petition by the first Wednesday of May. The measure only goes on the ballot if the legislature does not pass it and if the second round of signatures is successfully collected.

Details about this initiative

  • The initiative was filed in July 2023.[13]
  • On September 6, 2023, the initiative was cleared for signature gathering.[2]
  • On November 17, 2023, it was reported by 22 News that the campaign had collected over 130,000 signatures.[14]
  • On December 6, 2023, the Boston Herald reported that the Massachusetts Teachers Association submitted filed more than 135,000 signatures with the secretary of state's office.[15]
  • On January 3, 2024, the secretary of state reported that the campaign filed 101,511 valid signatures.[16]
  • The state legislature did not pass the initiative by the May 1 deadline. The campaign was cleared to gather a second round of signatures.
  • The campaign submitted 19,692 valid signatures for the second round by the deadline.[17][18]
  • On July 10, the secretary of state announced that the campaign had qualified for the ballot.[19]

Sponsors of the measure hired Ballot Access Management to collect signatures for the petition to qualify this measure for the ballot. A total of $521,499.00 was spent to collect the 87,003 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $5.99.


How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Massachusetts

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Massachusetts.

How to vote in Massachusetts


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, "Full text," accessed July 25, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, "List of petitions," accessed July 25, 2023
  3. 3.0 3.1 Fair Test, "Number Of States Requiring Tests For High School Graduation Plunges to EIGHT – Lowest Count Since Mid-1990s," January 5, 2023
  4. 4.0 4.1 WWLP, "MTA, Lexington mom align behind union’s MCAS proposal," August 16, 2023
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Massachusetts Campaign Finance, "Committee to Eliminate Barriers to Student Success for All," accessed January 29, 2024
  6. BNN, "Gov. Healey opposes ballot to eliminate MCAS graduation requirement in Massachusetts," accessed August 8, 2024
  7. 7.0 7.1 Massachusetts Secretary of State, "2024 Information for Voters," accessed September 13, 2024
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  9. Vote No on Question 2, "Home," accessed October 10, 2024
  10. 10.0 10.1 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, "Massachusetts Graduation Requirements and Related Guidance," accessed February 29, 2024
  11. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, "MCAS Results," accessed February 29, 2024
  12. Education Commission of the States, "High School Graduation Requirements 2023," accessed August 8, 2024
  13. Boston Herald, "Teachers union looks into ballot question nixing MCAS graduation requirement," accessed July 25, 2023
  14. 22 News, "130,000 Massachusetts residents looking to put MCAS graduation requirement on ballot," November 17, 2023
  15. Boston Herald, "Nixing MCAS requirement, psychedelic decriminalization advance toward 2024 ballot," December 6, 2023
  16. Ballotpedia Staff, "Email correspondence with Victoria Rose," January 3, 2024
  17. Boston Herald, "Ballot questions continue march toward November after clearing latest signature hurdle," June 18, 2024
  18. WWLP, "Commission to hear challenge to tipped worker ballot question,"July 11, 2024
  19. Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Galvin Certifies Ballot Questions for November Ballot," July 10, 2024
  20. Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "The Voting Process," accessed April 13, 2023
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Voter Registration Information," accessed April 13, 2023
  22. Governing, “Automatic Voter Registration Gains Bipartisan Momentum,” accessed April 13, 2023
  23. 23.0 23.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 26, 2024
  24. Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Massachusetts Official Mail-in Voter Registration Form," accessed November 1, 2024
  25. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  26. 26.0 26.1 Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Identification Requirements," accessed April 13, 2023