Matthew James (Pennsylvania)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Matthew James
Image of Matthew James

Education

Bachelor's

Albright College

Law

Pennsylvania State University

Personal
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Matthew James was a candidate for the Berks County Magisterial District in Pennsylvania. James was defeated in the general election on November 7, 2017.

Biography

James received a bachelor's degree from Albright College in 1994 and a J.D. from Pennsylvania State University in 1997. His professional experience includes working as an attorney in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. James' affiliations include the Pennsylvania Bar Association, the Berks County Bar Association, the Berks County Democratic Party, and Moment of Peace Adventures.[1]

Elections

2017

See also: Pennsylvania local trial court judicial elections, 2017

Pennsylvania held local judicial elections on November 7, 2017. A primary election occurred on May 16, 2017. The filing deadline for candidates who wished to run in this election was March 7, 2017. Candidates and recently appointed judges of the Courts of Common Pleas must initially run in partisan elections. Subsequent terms are won through retention elections. Elections for the Magisterial District Courts are always partisan. Pennsylvania allows cross-filing for candidates running in partisan elections. Most candidates run in both the Democratic and Republican primaries.[2]

Steven Chieffo (R) defeated Matthew James (D) in the general election for the Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3.[3]

Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3, General Election, 2017
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Republican Green check mark transparent.png Steven Chieffo 59.16% 4,384
     Democratic Matthew James 40.80% 3,023
Write-in votes 0.04% 3
Total Votes 7,410
Source: Berks County, Pennsylvania, "Election Results," accessed November 7, 2017


Matthew James defeated Steven Chieffo, Daniel VanBilliard, and David Krott in the Democratic primary for the Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3.[4]

Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3, Democratic Primary, 2017
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Matthew James 38.76% 662
Steven Chieffo 28.98% 495
Daniel VanBilliard 19.50% 333
David Krott 12.47% 213
Write-in votes 0.29% 5
Total Votes 1,708
Source: Berks County, Pennsylvania, "2017 Official Primary Election Results," May 16, 2017


Steven Chieffo defeated Matthew James, Daniel VanBilliard, and David Krott in the Republican primary for the Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3.[5]

Berks County Magisterial District 23-3-3, Republican Primary, 2017
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Steven Chieffo 44.66% 965
Matthew James 23.28% 503
Daniel VanBilliard 18.93% 409
David Krott 13.05% 282
Write-in votes 0.09% 2
Total Votes 2,161
Source: Berks County, Pennsylvania, "2017 Official Primary Election Results," May 16, 2017

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

Judges of the Pennsylvania Magisterial Districts are selected in partisan elections. They serve six-year terms. After their initial term, magistrates must run for new terms in contested races.[6][7]

Qualifications
A judge must be:

  • a local resident for at least one year;[7]
  • a state bar member;*
  • no younger than 21; and
  • no older than 75.

*Magisterial district judges may alternatively pass a training course to sidestep the bar member requirement.[7]

Campaign themes

2017

On Ballotpedia's biographical information submission form, James wrote the following:

A candidate's party affiliation should not be considered more than a mere formality by the voters. A Magisterial District Judge will never rule upon the polarized issues that separate Republicans and Democrats. I am not seeking to be elected to advance any of my underlying political beliefs, but to protect my community from abuses that may otherwise influence jurists who are not indoctrinated with a Code of Ethics via a professional license or familiar with the Rules of Evidence and Civil/Criminal Procedure from years of legal practice. My candidacy is to see that my home remains safely in the hands of its residents and not that of professional legal advocates whose loyalties must run only to their clients. My loyalty will run to my community.[8]
—Matthew James, 2017[1]

Judicial philosophy

Below is James' response to the question "What is your political philosophy?" on Ballotpedia's biographical information submission form.

An uninformed, uneducated or cavalier decision by a Magisterial District Judge ("MDJ") can have long-lasting and devastating consequences for the residents of a community. If a person is charged with a crime that carries the potential for incarceration, he or she has the right to be represented by a legally-educated and licensed attorney before appearing before a MDJ. However, that same person, if not more importantly the victim of the crime and the arresting officer, does not have the right to have the case heard and ruled upon by a similarly educated and trained MDJ. Such imbalances also arise when one civil litigant, such as a corporation or an individual with a larger income, appears with an attorney and his or her adversary does not. As I prosecutor and civil attorney, I observed non-lawyer MDJ's make decisions based upon the notoriety of a party's attorney, almost taking his/her arguments and contentions as the truth, rather than the underlying facts and testimony. Through my legal education, training and experience, I hope to better provide an even playing field for anyone who comes before me in my community's Magisterial District Court.[8]
—Matthew James, 2017[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes