Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Max Steiner

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Max Steiner
Image of Max Steiner
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 8, 2022

Education

Bachelor's

University California Berkeley, 2011

Military

Service / branch

U.S. Army Reserve

Service / branch

U.S. Army

Years of service

2005 - 2009

Personal
Birthplace
Sacramento, Calif.
Religion
Roman Catholic
Profession
Analyst
Contact

Max Steiner (Democratic Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent California's 1st Congressional District. He lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Steiner completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2021. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Max Steiner was born in Sacramento, California. Steiner served in the U.S. Army from 2005 to 2009 and has served in the U.S. Army Reserve. He earned a degree from the University of California at Berkeley in 2011. Steiner's career experience includes working as a diplomat with the Foreign Service and a policy analyst with the RAND Corporation.[1][2][3]

Elections

2022

See also: California's 1st Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House California District 1

Incumbent Doug LaMalfa defeated Max Steiner in the general election for U.S. House California District 1 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Doug LaMalfa
Doug LaMalfa (R)
 
62.1
 
152,839
Image of Max Steiner
Max Steiner (D) Candidate Connection
 
37.9
 
93,386

Total votes: 246,225
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 1

Incumbent Doug LaMalfa and Max Steiner defeated Tim Geist and Rose Penelope Yee in the primary for U.S. House California District 1 on June 7, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Doug LaMalfa
Doug LaMalfa (R)
 
57.1
 
96,858
Image of Max Steiner
Max Steiner (D) Candidate Connection
 
32.8
 
55,549
Image of Tim Geist
Tim Geist (R) Candidate Connection
 
6.7
 
11,408
Image of Rose Penelope Yee
Rose Penelope Yee (Independent)
 
3.4
 
5,777

Total votes: 169,592
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Max Steiner completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Steiner's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

Max Steiner is a fifth-generation Californian. He joined the Army in 2005 and served two years in Iraq as a infantryman before leaving Active Duty in 2009. He is still a member of the U.S. Army Reserves, where he is the First Sergeant of a Civil Affairs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_affairs#U.S._Military_Civil_Affairs) company. Max used his G.I. Bill to attend U.C. Berkeley, and he graduated with High Honors in 2011. In 2012, he joined the U.S. Foreign Service as a diplomat. He served two years in Honduras focusing on agricultural issues, two years in Tijuana, Mexico as a Consular Officer, and 15 months in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt, as a peacekeeper. His final assignment was in Washington, D.C., where he worked on the food security portfolio with colleagues in USDA and USAID. In 2019 he took a leave of absence to pursue a PhD at the RAND Corporation, where he focused on defense and diplomacy issues in Europe and Asia. Max lives with his wife Nika in Chico, California.
  • Forest Management: We need to adopt best practices to manage our forests to create resiliency in the face of climate change.
  • Fire Management: We need to return to a strategy of aggressive initial attack. We also need a more flexible way to manage wildland firefighters through pre-trained, part-time, reserve crews that the government can activate as needed.
  • National Security: The US faces an international environment that requires active diplomatic engagement with a military that stands ready. However, we don't need armchair generals. We need fighters in Congress that know the stakes.
We have a fire problem in the North State because we have a forest management problem, and the crux of the problem is that there is too much biomass in our forests.

We need to cut down many of the small- and medium-sized trees to create space. This space will facilitate tree growth and fire safety while generating responsible, renewable revenues for property owners. Our forests are a resource, but they are also increasingly a risk: we can manage that risk better through better policies.

Public discourse on this topic has too often been ruined by simplistic, sound-bite-ready policies on both sides of the political aisle. We can’t solve forestry with soundbites. My brother lost his house in Redding to the Carr fire: I have skin in the game, and I know that the status quo is unacceptable.

Policy Proposals:

Transition the Forest Service from USDA to the Department of Interior – where it would join the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service in managing our natural resources.

Subsidize the start-up costs and streamline the regulations for greater mill capacity and responsible logging in the North State. This will include market interventions to make American timber more competitive. We have too much biomass in our forests and we need to incentivize the market to thin the small, crowded trees that threaten our communities.
My first real job was as a U.S. Army Infantryman. It transformed me from a shy and nerdy co-captain of the school math team into an assertive and extroverted soldier. I took immense pride in wearing the American flag on my sleeve but, at the same time, I could tell the Iraq War was going poorly. I decided to become a diplomat and attended the University of California, Berkeley after finishing my second tour. The Army was, and continues to be, a huge influence on my life. It certainly has its downsides, and it is often difficult, but it is a job I take great pride in.
Our greatest challenge over the next decade will be persistent economic inequality at home and assertive rivals - China and Russia - overseas. On top of this, climate change will impose increasing economic costs, especially in water-dependent California.
I would like to be a member of the House Agricultural and House Armed Services Committees.
Yes. We do not have enough political moderates who were willing and able to hash out "acceptable" agreement that anger their political bases. Largely, this is a reflection of increasingly non-competitive seats where winning a primary is more difficult than winning the general election. The 24/7 partisan news cycle, which highlights any perceived deviation from the party line, also plays a role.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Note: Steiner submitted the above survey responses to Ballotpedia on February 5, 2022.

Campaign website

Steiner's campaign website stated the following:

Elections

Sixteen years ago I swore an oath to defend American democracy against all enemies “foreign and domestic” – I intend to keep that oath.

In 2020, the Republican Party lost the Presidential election and refused to accept the results. Doug LaMalfa and 133 other Republicans voted against certifying the results. Now the GOP is trying to rewrite state laws to ensure that their next attempt to steal an election is successful. This is unacceptable. Our democracy depends upon politicians respecting the results of free and fair elections.

The response of the Democratic Party and the Biden Administration to this attack on our democracy has been pitiful. Working on an infrastructure bill means nothing if democracy dies. Democrats need to fight to defend our right to vote. Too many incumbent Democrats are too comfortable, too complacent, or too old to fight for democracy. I am not a do-nothing Democrat. I have fought for democracy in Iraq and I intend to fight for democracy in Congress.

Policy Proposals:

  1. A new VRA: Pass a stronger Voting Rights Act fit for the challenges of 2022. Ensure that elected politicians never have the power to change the results of elections outside of a court challenge.
  2. Voter ID: Implement a federal voting I.D. program, to be run out of every U.S. Post Office, for free, six days per week. Photo identification for voting makes sense; but photo I.D.’s need to be free, convenient, and quick.
  3. Anti-Gerrymandering: Both parties engage in gerrymandering. Politicians use technology to pick their voters, rather than letting voters pick their politicians. We need to ban this practice at the federal level.


Forestry

We have a forest management problem in the North State. We cannot fix our forests with rakes or regulations – we need to invest billions of dollars in active forest management on a massive scale.

We need to cut down many of the small- and medium-sized trees to create space. This space will facilitate tree growth and fire safety, while generating responsible, renewable revenues for property owners. Our forests are a resource, but they are also increasingly a risk – we can manage that risk better through better policies.

Public discourse on this topic has too often been ruined by simplistic, sound-bite-ready policies on both sides of the political aisle. We can’t solve forestry with soundbites. My brother lost his house in Redding to the Carr fire: I have skin in the game, and I know that the status quo is unacceptable.

Policy Proposals:

  1. Fund forests as an essential part of our country’s environmental infrastructure: we need to allocate $6 billion/year in federal funds for fuels reduction, prescribed fires, defensible space, and stewardship agreements. In 1995, the USFS spent 16% of its budget on fire – last year the total was 65%. Worsening fire seasons have drained resources from essential forest maintenance and we need to fill that accumulated deficit.
  2. Consolidate land management agencies: Transition the Forest Service from USDA to the Department of Interior – where it would join the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service in managing our natural resources.
  3. Rebuild our timber industry: Spend $1 billion/year to subsidize the start-up costs and streamline the regulations for greater mill capacity and responsible logging in the North State. This will include market interventions to make American timber more competitive. We have too much biomass in our forests and we need to incentivize the market to thin the small, crowded trees that threaten our communities.
  4. Manage our forests at scale: Ease the NEPA process to allow large-scale forest management plans: we need to be approving and executing 100,000-acre-plus treatment plans that acknowledge the catastrophic risks of a “no-treatment” alternative.


Fire Suppression

Biden’s Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act allocated $3.3 billion to wildfire risk reduction over five years: about $660 million/year. It’s a well-intentioned start – and much more than the Republican Party was willing to spend – but it is insufficient.

We need a dedicated national effort to reduce the destructive impacts of uncontrolled wildfires. This will require an aggressive commitment by lawmakers to fund more firefighters, with more equipment, in more places. Just as importantly, lawmakers need to force USFS/BLM/NPS to change their culture from “managing fire” to “putting fires out and managing forests”.

Policy Proposals

  1. More federal money to fight fire on federal land: $1.7 billion dollars/year for at least five years.
  2. Build federal air capability: more smaller platforms like helicopters and single-engine air-tankers distributed around the nation and crewed/maintained by full-time federal personnel. Large, contracted air tankers have a place in the firefighting task organization; but they are expensive and lack flexibility.
  3. Aggressive initial attack: the practice of “managed fire” is inappropriate given the poor state of our nation’s forests. Prescribed fires during appropriate burn windows are essential for forest health, but letting natural fires burn outside of burn windows is irresponsible. “Out by 10:00 am” makes sense with dense forests, higher temperatures, and lower soil moisture levels.


Water

One of the most important things the federal government can do for California’s water crisis is to fund more dams.

If you think that California’s water problem can be solved with only dams: you are wrong. The changing climate means that the water is not there. If you think that you can solve California’s water problem with only water restrictions: you’re equally wrong. You will bankrupt farmers and destroy California’s agricultural industry.

We know, given climate change, that we will have these droughts in the future: that means a greater reliance on groundwater. The economics of these projects are clear, and every acre-foot of surface water capacity represents a foot less of groundwater users will need to pump.

Doug LaMalfa likes to claim that he knows water because he has a family tradition of using water. That is like a fox saying he should be in charge of the henhouse because he comes from a long line of foxes. The Steiners have a tradition of actually solving water problems in the West. My grand-uncle, Wesley Steiner, was Deputy Director of the California Department of Water Resources before becoming DWR Director in Arizona. There, he managed multiple competing issues in building the Central Arizona Project aqueduct, which moves 1.5 million acre-feet/year: balancing environmental and cost concerns while convincing farmers to tolerate groundwater limits.

I hope you will give me a chance to carry on the Steiner family’s tradition of solving water issues in the West through intelligent, balanced policymaking.

Policy Proposals:

  1. The federal government should fund 25% of Sites Reservoir for environmental water: cross-subsidizing capacity needed for urban and agricultural use while protecting vulnerable ecosystems.
  2. The federal government should continue to explore the Shasta Dam raise, and explore mechanisms to recoup costs through sales on the California Water Futures market.
  3. The federal government should continue to support California state efforts to balance groundwater use to provide an environmentally sustainable supply of water for users across the state.


National Defense and Law Enforcement

Unlike Doug LaMalfa, I have fought for my country. Moreover, as an Army Reservist, I stand ready to fight for America again. We have too many politicians in Congress that have never worn a uniform in combat, and who have wasted countless dollars and lives on ill-fated interventions overseas.

Russia has declared war on Ukraine. Despite what Trump says, this is not a “genius” move. It is an act of aggression, a humanitarian disaster, and a prelude of what will happen if the U.S. retreats from its role as a global leader. We are also facing the threat of a rising China: a totalitarian regime singularly focused on the rules-based international order that cost half a million American lives in World War Two. We live in the real world: where evil regimes stand ready to destroy everything we stand for. We need fighters in Congress that know the stakes.

I’ve never been a police officer (I can’t do everything!) but these are men and women putting their lives on the line over long shifts. I disagree with the current anti-cop rhetoric by many on the left. It’s unfair and unproductive. It reminds me of anti-military hate from the political left during Vietnam. It was inappropriate then, and it’s inappropriate now. I back the blue.

Guiding principles:

  1. The American military protects American interests. Sometimes that means protecting willing allies against foreign aggression. These military interventions are not zero cost: America must be willing to risk men and materiel to have influence. It does not mean nation building. We do not incur a Responsibility To Protect. Our soldiers are the cream of our society – and we must use them sparingly and decisively to secure an American future.
  2. Just as our military must remain a last resort, our diplomatic efforts overseas must remain proactively engaged on the front lines of foreign affairs. I have served as a diplomat in Honduras, Mexico, Egypt, and Washington, D.C. I know the issues, I know the questions to ask, and I know what the diplomatic service can reasonably accomplish.
  3. Local law enforcement deserves our support. Every organization has room for improvement, but our public safety officers have a difficult and important job. I’ve served as a diplomat and soldier overseas and I’ve seen many police forces up close – our police are fine.


Fire Personnel

We need a more flexible way to manage wildland firefighters. We need pre-trained, part-time crews that the government can activate as needed.

Fires are a national security problem, that are hard to predict, with a straightforward – though physically demanding – training pipeline. I’ve spent 10 years in the Army Reserves: this is literally the same set of problems that the Reserves and Guard were designed to solve. War is rare, unpredictable, and requires a country to have trained soldiers before it starts. We should use the military reserve/guard force structure as a model and apply it to the way we fight fires.

Policy Proposals:

  1. More Firefighters: fund, train, and equip thousands of Wildland Fire Reservists trained to a basic handcrew level (FFT2) that the Federal Government can call up when needed.
  2. Protect protect the civilian employment of wildland firefighters who are activated to fight large fires: USERRA for firefighters. The U.S. military protects its reserve members through USERRA – which protects the jobs of Reservists and Guardsmen when they are called to military duty. Reserve firefighters should have similar protections.
  3. Bring high-tier firefighters into full-time employment or split fire/university billets. We cannot lose highly-skilled firefighters to more stable civilian employment. In addition, educating motivated and experienced firefighters to take on positions of greater authority – such as professional foresters – can help fill personnel requirements within USFS/BLM/NPS.


Agriculture

As the American officer in charge of agricultural affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Honduras, I helped American farmers export rice, potatoes, and beef products even as local producers tried to get around the protections granted by CAFTA (The Central American Free Trade Agreement). I know the challenges that American producers face in exporting overseas and I know how to fight for you.

As your Congressman, I will support farmers in the district who have trouble penetrating the maze of American agricultural bureaucracy in Washington, D.C.

The farmers of this district don’t need a Congressman that knows how to farm – they’re not turning to D.C. for help with farming. The farmers of this district need a Congressman who understands how to solve bureaucratic problems.

I know how to support farmers through policy.

Policy Proposals:

  1. An amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow Foreign Agricultural Service officers of the United States Department of Agriculture to revoke the visas of foreign nationals and their dependents that impede the sale of U.S. agricultural products overseas.
  2. A more equitable and streamlined H2A (temporary, agricultural) visa process that safeguards the rights of foreign agricultural workers while satisfying the needs of American producers.


Constitutional Rights

Our constitutional rights define who we are as Americans. They are not set in stone – note the 17 additional amendments made since the original 10 – but neither should we allow them to be undermined through onerous legislative restrictions. I feel that too many Americans “support the Constitution” only when it tells them what they want to hear. We see this disappointing hypocrisy most clearly in “left-wing” restrictions on Americans’ Second Amendment right to bear arms and in “right-wing” restrictions on Americans’ Fourth Amendment right to privacy and personal choice in pregnancy.

Outlawing guns will not end gun violence any more than outlawing abortion will end abortion.

Policy Proposals:

  1. Prohibit state-level attempts to evade constitutional oversight via the “Texas Route” – allowing citizens to sue those who get an abortion (in Texas) or gun makers and distributors (in California). These legal maneuvers are unconstitutional and un-American.
  2. Protect the right of women to access safe, legal abortion services until viability regardless of their state of residence.
  3. Protect the right of Americans to buy semi-automatic firearms after a background check regardless of their state of residence.[4]
—Max Steiner's campaign website (2022)[5]

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia by Max Steiner on February 4, 2022
  2. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on February 5, 2022
  3. Max Steiner for Congress, "About Max," accessed May 18, 2022
  4. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  5. Max Steiner for Congress, “Issues,” accessed May 12, 2022


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
Ami Bera (D)
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
Adam Gray (D)
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
Ro Khanna (D)
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
Jim Costa (D)
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
Raul Ruiz (D)
District 26
District 27
District 28
Judy Chu (D)
District 29
Luz Rivas (D)
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
Ted Lieu (D)
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
Young Kim (R)
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
Dave Min (D)
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
Democratic Party (45)
Republican Party (9)