Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Maxwell v. Carney
This Ballotpedia article needs to be updated.
This Ballotpedia article is currently under review by Ballotpedia staff as it may contain out-of-date information. Please email us if you would like to suggest an update.
 |
This Open Records and Transparency Project article is a sprout. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by expanding this article. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunshine Laws |
| How to Make Records Requests |
| Sunshine Litigation |
| Sorted by State, Year and Topic |
| Sunshine Nuances |
| Deliberative Process Exemption |
Maxwell v. Carney was a case before the Georgia Supreme Court in 2001 concerning open meetings laws.
Background
Maxwell v. Carney , 273 Ga. 864 (2001) (Thompson, J.): County board of commissioners held monthly meeting in usual room, but on one occasion the room could not accommodate all people who wanted to attend. Board did not move meeting to larger room that had been used previously for meetings.
Supreme Court affirmed lower court's ruling that board must conduct meetings in larger meeting room if usual room was too small; but reversed lower court's ruling that board was required to provide adequate seating to enable all members of public to attend the meeting. Held that Act requires adequate, advance notice of a meeting, not physical access to all members of public.[1]
