Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Michael Golden

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Michael Golden

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Wyoming Supreme Court

Education

Bachelor's

University of Wyoming, 1964

Graduate

University of Virginia, 1992

Law

U.W. College of Law, 1967


Michael Golden was a justice of the Wyoming Supreme Court. Golden was a member of the court from 1988, when he was appointed by former Governor Mike Sullivan, until 2012. Golden served as the chief justice of the court from 1994 to 1996. He was retained in 1990, 1998, and 2006. He retired on Sept. 30, 2012, due to reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70.[1]

Education

Golden received his B.A. from the University of Wyoming in 1964, and his J.D. from the U.W. College of Law in 1967. Golden earned an LL.M. in Judicial Process from the University of Virginia in 1992.[2]

Military service

Golden served for four years in the Judge Advocate General Corps in the U.S. Army.[3]

Career

After retiring from the military, Golden spent his legal career in private practice. He was appointed to the Wyoming Supreme Court in 1988.[3]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Golden received a campaign finance score of -0.39, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of 0.37 that justices received in Wyoming.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes