Michael Heidenreich
From Ballotpedia
Michael Heidenreich (Democratic Party) is running for election to the U.S. House to represent Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District. He declared candidacy for the 2026 election.[source]
Heidenreich completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.
Elections
2026
See also: Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District election, 2026
Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.
General election
The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.
General election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 6
The following candidates are running in the general election for U.S. House Wisconsin District 6 on November 3, 2026.
Candidate | ||
 | Glenn Grothman (R) | |
Kelly Brown (D)  | ||
 | Michael Heidenreich (D) | |
 | Joey Marschall (D) | |
| Kortney Oldham (D) | ||
| Aaron Wojciechowski (D) | ||
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Endorsements
Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.
Campaign themes
2026
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Michael Heidenreich completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Heidenreich's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
| Collapse all
I am a life long Wisconsin resident, a husband,a father, and a union power plant worker. I have been volunteering for political campaigns and causes since I was 18 years old. The last 16 years of my life I have been working in IBEW local 965 and have proudly worked alongside my brothers and sisters in the union to keep the lights on in this state. I realized that volunteering wasn't going to be enough, and when asked to run in some local elections I jumped in. After that experience I looked at my district and saw that all the political figures I could vote for I was happy with and in many cases helped elect. US house being the sole exception. I realized I had the means at hand, so I have a duty to act. This is a guiding principle for my life, and i see representing this district as a calling I can not refuse.
- I believe we should be represented not ruled. Our representative democracy only exists because the people feel like their views are heard by their representatives and acted upon in Congress. I don't think anyone right now feels like they are getting their views heard or acted upon. I may not agree with every idea or method of governing I hear, but I'm going to listen and at least talk about it with you. I feel that should be the most basic thing to ask from our representatives.
- I feel we have gotten away from focusing on the issues of the working class. Specifically, the principals of universal healthcare and fully funded education have been held up as goals we just can't seem to achieve no matter how much desire there is for both. I can't think of more popular ideas to the general public, and yet time and again they are voted down as too hard and too expensive. I say we as a nation deserve better. And I think the time is ripe to both achieve and work on investing in our future, both our childrens future and our own health and happiness.
- We absolutely must address the growing tendency in this nation to ignore any working class issues and waive some cultural red flag up as a distraction while we are being literally robbed blind. I am going to focus in on actual achievable results in improving my constituents lives, not telling them who to fear and who to hate. We can no longer allow people who's only purpose is to destroy government to run rampant in the halls of Congress. It's time to put in someone who can actually build something that works for us.
There really are not many areas I'm not passionate about because if they are important to my constituency they are important to me. As for what I think I can bring actual knowledge to the table about, definitely the utility industry and power generation in general. I have been a life long student of the field of education, and can see no higher calling than helping make a teachers job easier.
I try to live my life by the motto that we are all people. Putting people up on a pedestal tends to help your ignore their faults and not learn from them. As such, although there are a thousand good examples, I try not to pedestal someone no matter how good they are.
A friend of mine gave me a quote the other day. " I reserve the right to get smarter". There are too many fields of study to know them all backwards and forwards, so knowing who to rely on to fill in the gaps is probably the most useful skill any legislator could possibly have. I think principals wise I have always seen the desire to represent and not rule as the guiding principle any representative should live by. My job is not to tell you what you want or believe, it's to try to help you achieve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It's to represent the majority if not all of my constituency, and not obey the wishes of a select few because it makes them a smidge more money.
I am willing to admit what I don't know, and do my best to learn anything I need to know. I also can admit when I'm wrong, which is almost entirely absent from quite a few representatives I have witnessed.
I think you have to look at your constituents as your clients that you are representing. Your loyalty is to them, and your duty is to accurately convey what they want and try your best to achieve it. I think that duty goes further into helping keep your constituents informed of what is going on in Congress and talking them thru issues coming up and ongoing. You should both be a source of information they can trust and the person they know is going to let what they want heard in the halls of Congress.
I'm going to let history decide that. I just hope my children look at my life and see someone trying to do the right thing and willing to act despite the cost.
As much as the challenger explosion was the first thing I remember happening, the event that most marked our generation and me had to be 9-11. I was 21 and can remember that day in more detail than I wanted to. The effects in how our government operates and how we as a people respond to fear on a national level are still being dealt with today.
I believe i bailed hay for a couple seasons for a farmer who drove my school bus. It was hard work that gave me a real feeling of accomplishment when I cleared that entire field.
Too many to count. Reading has been my escape and solace for my whole life.
Being poor. It has altered the path of my life almost every step of the way. I think lack of access to education and being overcharged for that education is going to be the defining shared experience of my generation.
I think the fact that I could theoretically actually meet all of the people in my district and actually talk to them is a unique thing in a national position. Because you can be so laser focused on a very small area, your awareness of what they want and their issues should be better informed than any Senator. Also because you have the power of the purse, it will be the house that primarily will have to dig the United States out of the debt we just incurred and have been incurring for generations.
I think a knowledge of how government works is useful because otherwise you spend too much time learning the actual job. However I feel sometimes the most effective representatives are people who spend more time in their district and less time in DC. I think too much time inside the beltway makes it easy to lose touch with what people in your district actually want and the issues they face.
Climate change is rapidly starting to show actual effects. Combined with the rise of nationalism and the US withdrawal from a leadership position around the world, and we are in a hell of a mess. We are going to have to re-establish the United States as a power in the world if we have the slightest chance of coping with climate change and the world wide persistent rise in fascism. It's going to take all of us working together and will likely be the challenge of our lives and the defining issue of the coming years.
I think it might be better if it was four just so less time is spent running for the office and more time is spent doing the job of the office. That however is a constitutional issue and unlikely to be changed anytime soon.
I think the greatest term limit should be voters unwillingness to elect people who no longer meet their needs as a representative. That should be the ultimate term limit and I think voters should take that responsibility seriously. I would be willing to change my mind on it but right now I think the focus should be on holding reps accountable for the jobs they are doing even if it's their first term vs an arbitrary number.
I think Tammy Baldwin has done an amazing job representing this state in DC. I have first hand seen how she runs her district office and that kind of service to her constituents is something I plan to emulate very closely.
Too many to count, but the overwhelming theme has been people having to make bad choices because they don't have the money to take care of their health or fund their education. I personally have had to do both, and it altered the trajectory of my life. I think we should care enough about our lives and livelihoods to invest in our future and that of our children. Frankly, I find the idea of making a profit off someone's health or education morally repugnant and not in keeping with the values of this state or this nation. It's time we charted a new path towards something better.
I believe once you know what you will never compromise on, then everything else should be something you are willing to talk about. I have no problem talking with colleagues on the other side of the isle, because I think they will know going on the issues I'm never going to compromise on. When your values are clear, the debate over the form of government can be a lot more civil.
This is a power the current congress has been derelict in their duty. The house should be constantly working to improve the lives of the people they represent, instead have almost abandoned that role to edicts from on high. That isn't how I'm going to govern and is a duty I intend to fulfill.
The House has ocilated between doing it's duty and prosecuting a case against the serious crimes of the powerful, to fullfiling witch hunts against people for the sole purpose of harnessing them. It's up to the people to elect people who take this duty seriously and apply it with wisdom.
I think that would largely be something I'd discuss with party leadership. I do think education is an area if like to have a hand in working on. I would want to help where ever I was needed, because I don't think there are useless committees, just jobs that need doing.
I believe if people can't know where your money is coming from the chance of outright bribery is simply too high. I think if you can't share how much you have made and where the money is, you are hiding something. I will fullfil all the requirements of the house ethics committee, and look for everyone else to do the same.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
See also
2026 Elections
External links
Footnotes
Senators
Tammy Baldwin (D)
Ronald Johnson (R)
Representatives
District 1
Bryan Steil (R)
District 2
Mark Pocan (D)
District 3
District 4
Gwen Moore (D)
District 5
Scott Fitzgerald (R)
District 6
Glenn Grothman (R)
District 7
Tom Tiffany (R)
District 8
Tony Wied (R)
Republican Party (7)
Democratic Party (3)
