Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Michael Munoz
Michael Munoz (Democratic Party) ran for election for judge of the Texas 360th District Court. He lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.
Munoz completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Munoz was born on May 25, 1973, in El Paso, Texas. He graduated from Texas State University with a bachelor's degree in 1999. He went on to obtain his J.D. from the Texas Wesleyan School of Law in 2002. Munoz's professional experience includes working as a senior litigation attorney.[1]
Elections
2020
See also: Municipal elections in Tarrant County, Texas (2020)
General election
General election for Texas 360th District Court
Incumbent Patricia Baca Bennett defeated Michael Munoz in the general election for Texas 360th District Court on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Patricia Baca Bennett (R) | 53.1 | 423,771 |
![]() | Michael Munoz (D) ![]() | 46.9 | 374,877 |
Total votes: 798,648 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Texas 360th District Court
Michael Munoz advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas 360th District Court on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Michael Munoz ![]() | 100.0 | 110,288 |
Total votes: 110,288 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Texas 360th District Court
Incumbent Patricia Baca Bennett advanced from the Republican primary for Texas 360th District Court on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Patricia Baca Bennett | 100.0 | 99,886 |
Total votes: 99,886 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
To view Munoz's endorsements in the 2020 election, please click here.
Campaign themes
2020
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Michael Munoz completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Munoz's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- Integrity matters and Judges should not be beholden to special interests and legislate from the bench or abuse their power to further a extreme political agenda.
- The Courts should be available to all and have free and open access to the court system. The judiciary should represent the makeup of the community and the people should have more than one choice on the ballot to choose from.
- The appointment of Judges after their resignation and the deadline for calling a special election is the abuse of power that takes away the will of the people. The people should elect a replacement and this policy is just collusion and subverting the will of the people.
Facilitating public policy is an area that I am passionate about. Often the courts are the first to reveal that there exist a social issue that is in the public interest to address and we have many state agencies, and private partners to help litigants address their personal issues that fall under a public policy consideration and help coordinate services and programs that can help litigants address the root causes of the present problems so that as a matter of Public Policy we can be a conduit for getting litigants in front of the right people to address the issues that can cause an impact in their lives, or to prevent future impacts from present circumstances.
This is a direct application of the law to the facts and circumstances before the court. These are not courts of equity but of jurisprudence. The equity is the implication of injunctive relief or procedures to either party and the law is the what dictates the result or outcome of the matter itself.
The ability to shape the way court is conducted so that we can safely resume the normal dockets and serve the public more safely and efficiently.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
See also
2020 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on September 28, 2020
Federal courts:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas
State courts:
Texas Supreme Court • Texas Court of Appeals • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals • Texas District Courts • Texas County Courts • Texas County Courts at Law • Texas Statutory Probate Courts • Texas Justice of the Peace Courts
State resources:
Courts in Texas • Texas judicial elections • Judicial selection in Texas