Michigan's 1st Congressional District election, 2026
|
← 2024
|
| Michigan's 1st Congressional District |
|---|
 |
| General election |
| Election details |
| Filing deadline: April 21, 2026 |
| Primary: August 4, 2026 General: November 3, 2026 |
| How to vote |
| Poll times:
7 a.m. to 8 p.m. |
| Race ratings |
DDHQ and The Hill: Pending Inside Elections: Solid Republican Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republican |
| Ballotpedia analysis |
| U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026 |
| See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th Michigan elections, 2026 U.S. Congress elections, 2026 U.S. Senate elections, 2026 U.S. House elections, 2026 |
All U.S. House districts, including the 1st Congressional District of Michigan, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. To learn more about other elections on the ballot, click here.
Candidates and election results
Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:
- Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
- Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies
General election
The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.
General election for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Callie Barr, Kyle Blomquist, Wayne Stiles, Justin Michal, and Zebulon Featherly are running in the general election for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on November 3, 2026.
Candidate | ||
 | Callie Barr (D) | |
 | Kyle Blomquist (D) | |
 | Wayne Stiles (D)  | |
 | Justin Michal (R) | |
 | Zebulon Featherly (Independent) | |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Wayne Stiles is a U.S. Congressional Candidate for Michigan's 1st Congressional District. An unapologetic Catholic, Industrial Designer, Entrepreneur and Small Business owner. Wayne was raised in West Michigan and earned a BFA degree from the University of Michigan. Wayne lives and works in Traverse City, MI."
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Justin Michal is a U.S. Congressional Candidate for Michigan’s 1st Congressional District, representing Northern Michigan and the Upper Peninsula. A proud Army veteran, conflict resolution expert, and advocate for education and veterans' rights, Justin’s life has been defined by service, leadership, and a commitment to Bridging the Divides. Raised in Grayling, Michigan, Justin understands small-town struggles—hard work, resilience, and the drive to create a better future. After a distinguished military career, he championed veterans' benefits, co-founded student veteran organizations, and helped raise millions in support. His research exposed housing allowance discrepancies for student veterans, leading to significant policy changes and national recognition from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Justin holds an MBA from Florida Atlantic University and is completing a Ph.D. in Conflict Analysis and Resolution. His work has informed UN officials and international NGOs. As an ombudsperson, he has helped resolve disputes and foster inclusive dialogue. His campaign centers on listening to the people, investing in infrastructure, expanding digital access, improving healthcare and education, protecting the environment, and building economic opportunity. For Justin, small-town values and real leadership can drive real change."
Voting information
- See also: Voting in Michigan
Ballotpedia will publish the dates and deadlines related to this election as they are made available.
Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses
Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Survey responses from candidates in this race
Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
| Collapse all
Justin Michal (R)
I know what it means to work hard, struggle, and still fall short. Raised in Grayling, I’ve lived the challenges that working families across Northern Michigan and the Upper Peninsula face every day. I’m not a career politician—I am one of you. I have served our country and dedicated my life to resolving conflict and standing up for what’s right. In Congress, I’ll continue that mission—fighting for affordable healthcare, rural investment, veterans’ services, and real economic opportunities that put people over politics. It’s time we had a voice in Washington that truly understands us.
Our communities are being torn apart by division and political games. It’s time to break down barriers and bring people together with solutions—not slogans. I believe in principled leadership rooted in service, not self-interest. Whether it’s protecting our natural resources, defending our constitutional rights, or ensuring access to education and healthcare—we can find common ground. My campaign is about transparency, engagement accountability, and motivation to build a better future for Michigan’s 1st Congressional District. Together, we’ll Bridge the Divides and build something sustainable and lasting—together.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Our democracy is the foundation of our freedom, and it must be protected. I will fight to ensure fair and secure elections, protect voting rights, and keep big money and corporate influence out of politics. Defending democracy means making government accountable to the people—not special interests—and standing up against efforts to erode trust in our institutions.
Fight for everyday hard working Americans
Too often, Washington forgets about the people who keep our communities running—teachers, farmers, small business owners, and working families. I will fight to lower costs, raise wages, and make sure hard work is rewarded with opportunity and dignity. My focus will always be on policies that strengthen the middle class, protect good jobs, and ensure that everyday Americans—not the wealthy and well-connected—are at the center of our government’s priorities.
Restore the American Dream
Justin Michal (R)
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Accountability is equally essential. An elected official must be willing to answer to the public, admit mistakes, and take corrective action when necessary. This includes maintaining open lines of communication with constituents and making decisions that are informed by their needs and concerns. Listening is a critical yet often overlooked trait in leadership. A good official must have the humility to listen and the courage to act based on what they’ve heard.
Empathy allows officials to understand the diverse experiences and struggles of those they represent. It fuels equitable policymaking and helps ensure that no community is left behind. In a nation as diverse as the United States, recognizing and valuing different perspectives strengthens the social fabric and brings more people into the democratic process.
Finally, service-driven leadership must be the foundation of all decisions. Public office is not about power or prestige—it is about being a steward of the people’s trust. An effective leader works to bridge divides, solve problems, and uplift communities. Especially in times of division, the ability to lead with vision, unity, and compassion is not just important—it is essential.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
I also bring a background in conflict resolution and ombuds service, which has trained me to listen deeply, mediate difficult conversations, and find common ground where others see only division. In today’s hyper-partisan environment, we need leaders who can build bridges, not burn them. I’m not interested in political games—I’m focused on delivering results, solving problems, and restoring trust in government.
Another quality I possess is authenticity. I’ve lived the struggles that many working and middle-class families face—economic uncertainty, navigating the VA system, and fighting for access to quality healthcare. I understand what it’s like to live in a rural community and feel overlooked by Washington. That lived experience allows me to connect with people not as a politician, but as a neighbor who knows what they’re going through and is willing to fight alongside them.
I am also guided by unshakable integrity. I believe public office is a sacred trust, not a steppingstone. I’m not beholden to special interests, political elites, or wealthy donors. I’m committed to putting people over politics—always. I believe in showing up, telling the truth, and standing firm in my values.
Justin Michal (R)
Another critical responsibility is to uphold and defend the Constitution, ensuring that all legislation and actions taken are rooted in the rule of law and respectful of individual rights and liberties. This includes preserving checks and balances, standing against corruption, and maintaining transparency in decision-making.
A representative must also be a bridge-builder and problem-solver, working across political lines when necessary to advance the common good. Ideological purity means little if it prevents progress or deepens division. Compromise, when done without sacrificing core values, is a powerful tool for governance.
Effective oversight of federal programs, support for small businesses and working families, advocacy for veterans and rural communities, and securing resources for infrastructure, education, and healthcare are also key components of the role.
Lastly, an elected official must lead by example—showing up, doing the work, and never forgetting who they serve. Public office is not a position of entitlement—it is a solemn responsibility, built on trust, that demands hard work, integrity, and an unwavering focus on service over self.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
One of the House’s defining qualities is its proportional representation, meaning the number of representatives per state is based on population. This guarantees that more populous states have a stronger voice, while still preserving a fair and balanced national conversation. It also allows diverse perspectives to enter the legislative process—from rural districts like those in Northern Michigan and the Upper Peninsula to densely populated urban areas—creating a mosaic of American life within a single institution.
The House also holds the exclusive power of the purse, meaning all revenue-related bills must originate there. This grants the chamber significant influence over taxation and federal spending, reinforcing its responsibility to ensure fiscal accountability and protect taxpayers' interests. In addition, the House plays a central role in oversight and investigations, often serving as the first check against executive overreach and governmental inefficiency.
Another important feature is the sheer speed and adaptability of the House. With 435 members and shorter terms, the chamber can be more agile in responding to crises, public demand, and emerging issues. While this can lead to fierce debate and partisan divisions, it also reflects the vibrancy of a healthy democracy.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Our government was never meant to be run by a permanent political class. It was designed for citizen leadership—people from all walks of life bringing their skills, experiences, and values to the table to serve their fellow Americans. I believe that servant leadership should come from those who have served their communities in meaningful ways—whether in the military, small business, education, healthcare, or public service—not just those who’ve climbed the political ladder.
Having a fresh perspective is a strength, not a weakness. It allows for bold thinking, innovative solutions, and a willingness to challenge the status quo. My background in the military, conflict resolution, and advocacy has taught me how to lead under pressure, listen with empathy, and work through complex problems to find real solutions. Those qualities aren’t taught in politics—they’re learned in life.
While some knowledge of the legislative process is important, it can be learned. What cannot be taught is authenticity, accountability, and a deep commitment to doing what’s right, even when it’s hard. We need more people in Congress who haven’t been conditioned by partisan politics or beholden to donors—but who are there to serve the people with honesty and courage.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Social Security is a cornerstone of economic security for millions of retirees, people with disabilities, and survivors of deceased workers. However, current projections indicate that the Social Security trust fund could be depleted within the next decade if reforms are not enacted. This would result in reduced benefits for future recipients—many of whom rely on these funds as their primary source of income. We must protect Social Security, not by cutting benefits or raising the retirement age, but by modernizing its funding model. Preserving this program is not just an economic imperative—it is a moral commitment to the generations who built this nation.
At the same time, the United States faces the challenge of a rapidly increasing national debt, now exceeding $37 trillion. If left unchecked, rising interest payments on the debt will crowd out essential investments in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and defense.
Addressing these challenges requires fiscal responsibility paired with compassion. We must ensure that future generations inherit a nation that is not only financially secure but still honors its promises. If we act with courage and common sense, we can strengthen Social Security and reduce the debt.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
From the moment a representative is sworn into office, they are already under pressure to prepare for the next election. The demands of fundraising, political positioning, and securing party support consume valuable time and energy that should be spent crafting legislation, overseeing government operations, and engaging with the community. In many cases, representatives are pulled away from their districts to raise money or travel for campaign events—just to remain competitive in the next election. This non-stop cycle benefits entrenched power structures and wealthy donors, not the people.
The result is a system that encourages short-term thinking and political calculation, rather than thoughtful leadership and bold action. Representatives are often hesitant to take difficult but necessary positions for fear of immediate electoral backlash, which stifles progress on critical issues like Social Security reform, veterans' care, and debt reduction. It’s a system that rewards talking points over solutions and headlines over hard work.
Extending the term length—while maintaining transparency and accountability—would allow representatives more time to govern effectively, engage deeply with issues, and deliver real results for the American people. It would also reduce the influence of money in politics by minimizing the constant need to campaign.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
In nearly every other profession, individuals are expected to step aside at a certain point to make room for the next generation. Why should public office be any different? As the Social Security Administration determines when individuals are eligible for full retirement benefits—typically between ages 66 and 67 depending on birth year—it’s only reasonable that elected officials should follow the same guideline. This approach respects the experience of seasoned leaders while also ensuring that those making laws and guiding national policy are physically and mentally equipped to handle the demands of the job.
Mandatory retirement would naturally limit tenure without undermining voter choice or cutting short the careers of effective public servants too early. It would also encourage greater generational diversity in government—something that is sorely needed in a rapidly changing world. Fresh perspectives, innovative thinking, and representation of younger Americans are essential to maintaining a dynamic and forward-looking democracy.
This policy could also help reduce the entrenched power structures that often develop over time and pave the way for more competitive and open elections. While experience is valuable, it should not become a barrier to progress. Public service should be about contribution, not career preservation.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
He told me about struggling with service-connected injuries, both visible and invisible, and how difficult it was to access consistent, quality mental health care in a rural area. The nearest VA clinic was hours away, and appointments were often delayed or canceled due to staffing shortages. He felt like a number in a broken system—left behind, despite having honored his commitment to serve.
What struck me most was his resilience. Despite everything, he wasn’t angry—he was hopeful. He believed that change was possible, and he wanted to be part of a community and a country that didn’t forget its own. His story reminded me why I chose to run: to fight for people like him, who have given so much and ask for so little in return.
That conversation reinforced my commitment to improving Veterans Affairs, especially in rural communities. But beyond that, it reminded me that policy is personal. Behind every issue—whether it's Social Security, healthcare, or economic opportunity—are real people with real struggles who deserve better. Listening to their stories isn’t just a campaign activity—it’s a responsibility and a privilege.
Stories like his are why I’m committed to servant leadership rooted in empathy, action, and accountability. They remind me that our mission is not about power—it's about people. And we must never forget the human impact of the work we do.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
Justin Michal (R)
As someone with a strong background in conflict resolution and service to this country, I’ve learned that real leadership means listening, understanding different perspectives, and having the courage to work with those you may disagree with. That’s not weakness—it’s strength. It takes more conviction to build a bridge than to stand on one side shouting across the divide.
For Republican constituents, I recognize the importance of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and personal liberty. Those are values I share and will always defend. But advancing those principles effectively often requires working with others to create laws that are not only grounded in conservative values but are also implementable, balanced, and respectful of the broader public interest. No lasting solution—on Social Security, border security, veterans’ care, or debt reduction—can happen without bipartisan effort.
Refusing to compromise leads to gridlock, dysfunction, and missed opportunities. The American people deserve results, not more political theater. Compromise done right isn’t about abandoning beliefs—it’s about delivering real-world solutions that reflect the will of the people while maintaining the integrity of our Constitutional framework.
In Congress, I won’t compromise on integrity or the Constitution, but I will always be willing to sit down at the table, listen, and find common sense solutions—because that’s how we get things done for the American people.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
This power is not just procedural—it’s foundational to ensuring that the people have a voice in how their money is raised and spent. I would use it to advocate for a fairer tax code that doesn't overburden the middle class or small businesses while ensuring that the wealthiest individuals and corporations pay their fair share. Our tax policies must support American workers, not leave them carrying the weight of irresponsible federal spending or outdated tax loopholes.
This role would also support my focus on protecting Social Security and addressing the national debt. These aren’t abstract numbers—they’re about the future of retirement security and economic opportunity. I believe we can and must pass revenue legislation that responsibly funds Social Security without cutting benefits or increasing the burden on those already struggling. Revenue bills should reflect our priorities as a nation—and mine are clear: take care of those who have paid in, ensure veterans and working families are supported, and stop mortgaging our children’s future for short-term political gains.
I would fight to restore public trust in how government handles taxpayer dollars. This power is not just about money—it’s about accountability, values, and making sure Washington serves the people—not the other way around.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
First and foremost, investigations should focus on protecting taxpayer dollars and exposing waste, fraud, and abuse in government agencies and programs. Whether it's ensuring the responsible use of federal funding or uncovering mismanagement within departments like Veterans Affairs or Social Security, the House has a duty to ask tough questions and demand honest answers. Oversight must be based on facts—not ideology—and it should lead to constructive solutions, not just headlines.
The House must also use its investigative authority to hold both public and private entities accountable when their actions harm the public good. This includes everything from corporate misconduct that affects consumers or workers, to examining the influence of foreign adversaries or powerful special interests that undermine national security, elections, or public trust.
As a veteran and public servant, I believe strongly that investigations should also be used to protect whistleblowers and ensure that those who speak out about wrongdoing are shielded from retaliation. A transparent government only exists when people feel safe to come forward and tell the truth.
However, with this power comes great responsibility. Oversight should never be used as a political weapon or a tool to score points. When investigations are driven by partisan agendas, they lose credibility and distract from real issues. The American people deserve seriousness, fairness, and results—not grandstanding.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Justin Michal (R)
First and foremost, I would be honored to serve on the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. With firsthand experience navigating the challenges faced by veterans—including access to healthcare, mental health support, transition services, and the VA system—I understand the urgent need for reform and increased responsiveness. I would work to ensure that every veteran receives the care, respect, and support they’ve earned, especially those in rural and underserved areas like many parts of Northern Michigan and the Upper Peninsula.
I’m also drawn to the House Committee on Armed Services. As a retired U.S. Army veteran, I have a deep understanding of national security, defense policy, and the needs of active-duty service members and their families. I believe in maintaining a strong national defense while ensuring that our military strategy reflects the realities of modern warfare, cybersecurity threats, and global diplomacy.
Another area of strong interest is the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. I’m passionate about ensuring transparency in government spending and holding public institutions accountable to the people they serve. I would advocate for stronger oversight of federal agencies, better protections for whistleblowers, and reforms to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse.
Finally, I would welcome the opportunity to serve on the House Committee on Ways and Means, particularly to focus on protecting and strengthening Social Security. This program is vital to millions of Americans, and I believe my voice—grounded in both personal experience and public service—can help guide responsible reforms that preserve it for future generations.
Justin Michal (R)
Financial transparency means that taxpayers should know where their money is going, how it’s being spent, and whether it’s producing results. Budgets, contracts, and expenditures should be easy to access and understand. Clear, public reporting builds trust and allows citizens to evaluate whether their leaders are acting responsibly and effectively. It also helps prevent waste, fraud, and abuse by keeping public institutions under watchful eyes—not behind closed doors.
Government accountability goes hand in hand with transparency. It means that public officials, from local governments to federal agencies, must be held to the highest standards of integrity and ethics. When mistakes are made or promises go unfulfilled, there must be consequences—not cover-ups. Leaders should admit when something isn’t working and take steps to fix it, not shift blame or hide behind bureaucracy.
I also believe in increasing oversight and strengthening protections for whistleblowers, journalists, and watchdog organizations that help shine a light on misconduct. Accountability shouldn’t be viewed as a threat by those in power—it should be welcomed as a tool to ensure we are always striving to do better.
Ultimately, public service is about stewardship—not control. The money spent is not the government’s money—it’s the people’s. Transparency and accountability aren’t just ideals to talk about during a campaign. They must be lived every day in office, with a clear and constant reminder: we work for the people, and the people deserve the truth.
Wayne Stiles (D)
Wayne Stiles (D)
Wayne Stiles (D)
You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:
Campaign finance
| Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callie Barr | Democratic Party | $102,354 | $38,580 | $71,415 | As of September 30, 2025 |
| Kyle Blomquist | Democratic Party | $21,531 | $11,827 | $9,704 | As of September 30, 2025 |
| Wayne Stiles | Democratic Party | $31,699 | $25,170 | $6,529 | As of September 30, 2025 |
| Justin Michal | Republican Party | $35,177 | $28,059 | $7,119 | As of September 30, 2025 |
| Zebulon Featherly | Independent | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
|
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
|||||
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[1]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[2][3][4]
| Race ratings: Michigan's 1st Congressional District election, 2026 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
| 10/14/2025 | 10/7/2025 | 9/30/2025 | 9/23/2025 | ||||||
| The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | |||||
| Decision Desk HQ and The Hill | Pending | Pending | Pending | Pending | |||||
| Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | |||||
| Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | |||||
| Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week. | |||||||||
Ballot access
This section will contain information on ballot access related to this state's elections when it is available.
District history
The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.
2024
See also: Michigan's 1st Congressional District election, 2024
Michigan's 1st Congressional District election, 2024 (August 6 Democratic primary)
Michigan's 1st Congressional District election, 2024 (August 6 Republican primary)
General election
General election for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman defeated Callie Barr, Liz Hakola, and Andrew Gale in the general election for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ |  | Jack Bergman (R) | 59.2 | 282,264 |
| Callie Barr (D) | 37.9 | 180,937 | |
| Liz Hakola (Working Class Party) | 1.8 | 8,497 | ||
 | Andrew Gale (L) | 1.1 | 5,486 | |
| Total votes: 477,184 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Bensson Samuel (Independent)
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Callie Barr defeated Bob Lorinser in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 6, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Callie Barr | 58.5 | 40,787 |
 | Bob Lorinser | 41.5 | 28,936 | |
| Total votes: 69,723 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman defeated Joshua Saul in the Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 6, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jack Bergman | 79.3 | 92,498 |
 | Joshua Saul | 20.7 | 24,155 | |
| Total votes: 116,653 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- J.D. Wilson (R)
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Andrew Gale advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on July 20, 2024.
Candidate | ||
| ✔ | | Andrew Gale (L) |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Working Class Party convention
Working Class Party convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Liz Hakola advanced from the Working Class Party convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on June 23, 2024.
Candidate | ||
| ✔ | Liz Hakola (Working Class Party) | |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
2022
General election
General election for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman defeated Bob Lorinser, Liz Hakola, and Andrew Gale in the general election for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jack Bergman (R) | 60.0 | 233,094 |
| Bob Lorinser (D) | 37.4 | 145,403 | |
| Liz Hakola (Working Class Party) | 1.4 | 5,510 | ||
| Andrew Gale (L) | 1.2 | 4,592 | |
| Total votes: 388,599 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Bob Lorinser advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 2, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Bob Lorinser | 100.0 | 67,251 |
| Total votes: 67,251 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 2, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jack Bergman | 100.0 | 111,911 |
| Other/Write-in votes | 0.0 | 6 | ||
| Total votes: 111,917 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Andrew Gale advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on July 10, 2022.
Candidate | ||
| ✔ | | Andrew Gale (L) |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Working Class Party convention
Working Class Party convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Liz Hakola advanced from the Working Class Party convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on June 26, 2022.
Candidate | ||
| ✔ | Liz Hakola (Working Class Party) | |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
2020
General election
General election for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman defeated Dana Alan Ferguson and Ben Boren in the general election for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jack Bergman (R) | 61.6 | 256,581 |
 | Dana Alan Ferguson (D) | 36.8 | 153,328 | |
 | Ben Boren (L) | 1.5 | 6,310 | |
| Total votes: 416,219 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Dana Alan Ferguson defeated Linda O'Dell in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 4, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Dana Alan Ferguson | 64.2 | 45,565 |
 | Linda O'Dell | 35.8 | 25,388 | |
| Total votes: 70,953 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Ryan Ruzziconi (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Incumbent Jack Bergman advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on August 4, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jack Bergman | 100.0 | 100,716 |
| Total votes: 100,716 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1
Ben Boren advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Michigan District 1 on July 18, 2020.
Candidate | ||
| ✔ | | Ben Boren (L) |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
District analysis
This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.
See also
| Michigan | 2026 primaries | 2026 U.S. Congress elections |
|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
|
Voting in Michigan Michigan elections: 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 |
Republican primary battlegrounds U.S. Senate Democratic primaries U.S. Senate Republican primaries U.S. House Democratic primaries U.S. House Republican primaries |
U.S. Senate elections U.S. House elections Special elections Ballot access |
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
