Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Michigan Capital Punishment Amendment (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Michigan Capital Punishment Amendment
Flag of Michigan.png
Election date
November 8, 2016
Topic
Death penalty
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


Voting on
the Death Penalty
Death penalty.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

The Michigan Capital Punishment Amendment was not put on the November 8, 2016, ballot in Michigan as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment.

The measure would have permitted the death penalty for "first degree murder of a peace officer," also known as a police officer, "or a corrections officer" while the officer was on duty.[1]

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Article IV, Michigan Constitution

The proposed amendment was designed to amend Section 46 of Article IV of the Michigan Constitution. The following underlined text would be added by the proposed measure's approval:[1]

Sec. 46. No law shall be enacted providing for the penalty of death, except that the death penalty is permitted in cases of the first degree murder of a peace officer or a corrections officer while the peace officer or corrections officer is engaged in his or her duties as peace officer or corrections officer.[2]

Background

Michigan was the first state to ban capital punishment, doing so in 1847, and was one of 18 states that prohibited the death penalty as of 2016.[3] The state was also the first government in the English-speaking world to prohibit the death penalty.[4]

Support

Supporters

The amendment was introduced into the Michigan Legislature by:[1]

Arguments

  • Sen. Virgil Smith (D-4), who proposed the amendment, argued, "If you kill a cop, you're the most egregious criminal out there. If you're willing to go that far, there's no telling what you're willing to do. There should be no mercy at that point."[3]

Opposition

Opponents

Arguments

  • Sen. Rick Jones (R-24), who previously worked in the Eaton County Sheriff's Office and has been shot twice, said he is against the amendment because "occasionally the system makes a mistake." He continued, "We cannot dig a man up and say, 'Sorry, we made a mistake'..."[4]
  • President and CEO of the Michigan Catholic Conference, Paul A. Long, said his organization is prepared to fight the amendment. He argued, "The death penalty is an antiquated and inhumane method of punishment representing nothing more than retaliation and more violence. It has no place in a civilized society."[4]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Michigan Constitution

To be placed on the ballot before voters, the proposed amendment must be agreed upon by two-thirds of the members elected to and serving in each chamber of the Michigan Legislature.

See also

External links

Additional reading

Footnotes