Michigan Regulations on Fraternal Benefit Societies Initiative (1916)
| Michigan Regulations on Fraternal Benefit Societies Initiative | |
|---|---|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Insurance policy |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Initiated constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Michigan Regulations on Fraternal Benefit Societies Initiative was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Michigan on November 7, 1916. It was defeated.
A “yes” vote supported establishing regulations on fraternal benefit societies. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing regulations on fraternal benefit societies. |
Election results
|
Michigan Regulations on Fraternal Benefit Societies Initiative |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 225,220 | 39.17% | ||
| 349,810 | 60.83% | |||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Regulations on Fraternal Benefit Societies Initiative was as follows:
| “ | To amend Article XII of the Constitution by adding thereto a section to be known as Section 10, requiring the legislature to provide by law for the incorporation, regulation and supervisiosn of fraternal benefit societies. | ” |
Path to the ballot
An initiated constitutional amendment is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends a state's constitution. Eighteen (18) states allow citizens to initiate constitutional amendments.
In Michigan, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 10% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.
See also
External links
- Livingston County Daily Press and Argus, "GENERAL ELECTION," October 25, 1916
- University of Michigan Press, "The Initiative and Referendum in Michigan," 1940
Footnotes
State of Michigan Lansing (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |