Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Mikayla Ridley

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Mikayla Ridley
Image of Mikayla Ridley

Education

Bachelor's

Boston University, 2016

Personal
Birthplace
Seattle, Wash.
Profession
Admissions counselor
Contact

Mikayla Ridley (Democratic Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent New York's 22nd Congressional District. She did not appear on the ballot for the Democratic primary on August 23, 2022.

Ridley completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2021. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Mikayla Ridley was born in Seattle, Washington. She received a bachelor's degree from Boston University in 2016. Ridley's professional experience includes being an admissions counselor at Binghamton University and working for a nonprofit.[1]

Elections

2022

See also: New York's 22nd Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House New York District 22

Brandon Williams defeated Francis Conole in the general election for U.S. House New York District 22 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Brandon Williams
Brandon Williams (R / Conservative Party) Candidate Connection
 
50.5
 
135,544
Image of Francis Conole
Francis Conole (D)
 
49.5
 
132,913
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.1
 
151

Total votes: 268,608
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House New York District 22

Francis Conole defeated Sarah Klee Hood, Sam Roberts, and Chol Majok in the Democratic primary for U.S. House New York District 22 on August 23, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Francis Conole
Francis Conole
 
39.5
 
10,971
Image of Sarah Klee Hood
Sarah Klee Hood Candidate Connection
 
35.2
 
9,790
Image of Sam Roberts
Sam Roberts
 
13.2
 
3,662
Image of Chol Majok
Chol Majok
 
11.9
 
3,315
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.2
 
58

Total votes: 27,796
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House New York District 22

Brandon Williams defeated Steven Wells in the Republican primary for U.S. House New York District 22 on August 23, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Brandon Williams
Brandon Williams Candidate Connection
 
57.4
 
14,351
Image of Steven Wells
Steven Wells Candidate Connection
 
42.0
 
10,501
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.6
 
141

Total votes: 24,993
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Conservative Party primary election

The Conservative Party primary election was canceled. Brandon Williams advanced from the Conservative Party primary for U.S. House New York District 22.

Working Families Party primary election

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Mikayla Ridley completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2021. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Ridley's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am an activist, public service worker, and people-focused progressive democrat. Having worked in nonprofits and public education since graduating from college, the challenges faced by everyday New Yorkers are not hypothetical to me. I have spent my adult life living paycheck to paycheck, I know what it’s like to be buried by student debt, and I know how it feels to go to a doctor worried as much about the bill as I am about the test results. Our country and our district are deeply divided, but I believe that our goals are largely the same. We all want an economy that rewards hard work; a criminal justice system that keeps us safe; healthcare and education systems that maximize quality and accessibility; and a country that truly ensures "liberty and justice for all." I believe there is common ground within our division, and I have a passion for using that common ground to make the social, political, and economic changes that will put our country's power back where it belongs—in the hands of average Americans. I hope to bring this passion to Congress and serve my community as Representative of New York's 22nd Congressional District.
  • National problems require national solutions. I’ve spent my career on the ground dealing with systemic injustice and inequality on an individual and community level. This work is so important, but it will never be enough until we fix the root of the problems. And Congressional Representatives have the ability to make that change.
  • We are one of the wealthiest countries in the world, and we need to use that power for good. From healthcare to education to food and shelter to participation in governance, we have the financial ability to guarantee these basic human rights for everyone. And, with issues this important, the financial ability to do it means the moral obligation to make it happen.
  • Common ground is more important than compromise. Meeting in the middle is not always what’s best for the people, but when we put people first, we can find bipartisan solutions that will make our country stronger together.
I have first-hand experience dealing with many of our country's problems, and I use that to drive my passion for public policy. I haven’t just talked to voters who are crippled by student debt; I’m dealing with that struggle myself. I don’t just know people who have delayed or avoided medical care because they couldn't afford it; I’ve had to make that choice in my own life. I’m not just worried that my grandchildren will see the impact of climate change; I worry about the catastrophic effects my generation has already witnessed. The problems of everyday Americans are personal to me. And this doesn’t just help me to better understand and address these problems when I get a seat at the table; it changes how I walk into the room.

My personal identity also shapes my political goals and my approach to public policy. Having come out as bisexual near the end of high school, I focused a lot of my time in college on activism in the LGBTQIA+ community and discovered a passion for social justice, equity, and inclusion. I began to shape my career around a desire to support and advocate for others. This meant that, as we built our campaign, we focused on human rights and codifying them into law. Basic human rights like healthcare, education, food and shelter, employment, living wages, equal participation in governance, and a livable planet are not luxuries. Every single member of our society needs these basic services to survive and thrive. And we plan to make that happen in Congress.
In high school I had a biology teacher for two years named Ms. Black. We've kept in touch since I graduated and I still get coffee with her every time I go back to Seattle. She is probably the most positive, optimistic, energetic woman I have ever met, so most people would be surprised to learn that she's been fighting stage 4 ovarian cancer for over 16 years now. And she continues to win that fight every day.

She is a brilliant woman who taught me the importance of science, data, and critical thinking, but the most valuable lesson I learned from her was the one she never covered in the classroom. She is someone who took the very worst that life could throw at her and used it to fuel her fire and make the world a better place. Hardship has only ever made her stronger and kinder, and she has passionately served as a public school teacher for over three decades now.

I've been through hardships in my life and I use that as motivation to pave a smoother path for those that come after me. There are many people in my life who taught me to do that, but I don't think anyone has given me a better example of it than Ms. Black.
An understanding of systemic problems is crucial to serving as an elected official. No one person will have experience with every issue or be able to represent every demographic, but the most important role of government is to respond to and alleviate systemic problems. So—whether you gain an understanding through personal experience or research and empathic listening—you need to know what’s really going on in order to effectively work to solve problems. I have a lot of personal experience that will allow me to be a true Representative for my district, but listening to my community members and fighting for their rights with the same fire that I would use to fight for my own—that will also be immeasurably important in Congress.

Another important characteristic is understanding the difference between being principled and appearing principled. This can be a challenge for elected officials whose jobs largely depend on positive public image, but it is essential to being a good Representative. Too often in Congress, politicians “stand their ground” only to appear strong in the public eye. They refuse to agree to “something that is better than nothing” and so, instead, we achieve nothing. And it goes in the other direction, too. Democrats especially will adopt woefully inadequate responses to corruption and will accept injustice under the guise of “being the bigger person.”

Too often politicians are walking away from the table with a feeling of moral superiority and nothing else to show for it. Standing on principle isn’t about protecting your public image; it’s about getting things done. It’s about creating and passing legislation that will actually give you equitable and principled results.
Complexity is not a vice. Admittedly, this is not my own original legacy as much as it is a quote from C.J. Cregg in my favorite episode of “The West Wing,” but it was a philosophy of mine for a long time before watching the show.

Complexity is often seen as something negative in politics (and in our society in general). “It’s complicated” is synonymous with “I don’t want to talk about it” and, too often, it’s synonymous with “I don’t know.”

But “it’s complicated” should not be the end of the conversation. It should be the beginning. Politics are complicated. There are nuances and caveats and clarifications to every political issue. We often want things to be simple so that we can easily know which side to stand on, but tax structures and healthcare and education and criminal justice reform are not simple issues.

Extremist policies can be explained in a few words or sentences. Moderate policies cannot. Progressive Democrats are the moderate middle-ground voices of America, but we consistently fail in our messaging because we attempt to boil nuanced and detailed policies down to hashtags and catch phrases.

Accepting complexity for what is—an essential and unavoidable element of a thriving democracy—is the only way that we can live up to our Constitution’s promise and “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity.”

Acknowledging and accepting complexity is a sign that you actually understand the issue at hand. And, if there was one main message that people take away from my campaign and my career, I hope it will be that.
Hermione Granger. Especially the book version. The movie version is great (gotta love Emma Watson!) but the books give her character more depth. In the book she’s still brilliant and brave, but she also definitely needs the support of her friends just as much as they need her. She thinks critically and she’s a good person, but she doesn’t always know the right answer or always make the right decision. She has strengths and weaknesses that are complemented and balanced by the other main characters. She is a leader, but she couldn’t be one without her team.

Being born in the early-90s, I grew up with the books and Hermione was always a feminist role model for me. Plus, you know, magic powers would be really fun!
Experience in government and politics is absolutely beneficial, but it is not the only kind of experience that matters. In some political positions like governor or president, we often have to choose between experience in government and experience actually dealing with the problems that government is meant to solve. No one person can be both a political insider and a political outsider so, when asked to choose one or the other, we tend to take comfort in political experience.

But the House of Representatives doesn’t require us to choose. The House is a governing body of 435 people meant to genuinely represent the entire United States of America. So the most effective House would actually be a mix of many ages, races, sexual orientations, genders, abilities, religions, and—yes—a mix of booth career politicians (who know how to get things done) and political outsiders (who know, from experience, what needs to be done).

Unfortunately, while the House could and should be diverse and balanced, it currently is not. The demographics of the House are heavily skewed towards career politicians, especially those who are older, wealthy, white, straight, Christian men. And—while there is nothing inherently wrong with those demographics—that group alone is not a fair cross-section of our country. We currently have a House that is so heavily skewed towards one group that the problems of the entire rest of the country have become hypothetical to them. We have plenty of career politicians in Congress who are bringing that kind of experience to the table; what we need is average American citizens who will bring us something new.
Division. Without question. We face many challenges as a nation, but the vast majority of them come down to some form of division. And we often propose bad solutions to deal with it.

When we see sexism in our country, many suggest that women should stop being so sensitive because it’s not that bad. When we see racism, many suggest that we should stop talking about race so much and “move on.” When we see homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, many suggest that we LGBTQ folks should just “leave it to the bedroom” because it’s only a problem when we make it a problem. And when we see political divide in Congress, many people suggest that we should just meet in the middle between the two party’s proposals, whatever they may be. But in our current system both parties are skewed far right. The middle ground between the two parties is not the middle ground between the two sides. And when it comes to issues of discrimination and injustice, the middle ground between oppression and equality is simply not an acceptable option. Ignoring the problem will never make it go away.

Division is our country’s biggest challenge right now and we need to address it head on and talk about it and fix it. We need these conversations to be happening at every level of our society and every level of our government. Silence and neutrality and “middle ground politics” is never a good enough answer.
While I understand the merits behind it, no, I don’t think that two years is an entirely appropriate term length. The concept behind this was that The People’s House should be the most adaptive element of the federal government—that shorter terms for Representatives would allow the House to rapidly change direction with the changing opinions of the general public. And that does make sense in theory. But, in practice, the result is a governing body that is constantly campaigning: constantly thinking more about how an action looks than what it actually does for the public. While there should absolutely be safeguards to remove and replace those who don’t properly represent their district (even outside election years), I think the public would be better served by representatives with slightly longer terms.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on June 3, 2021


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
Pat Ryan (D)
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
Democratic Party (21)
Republican Party (7)