Mike Seminary recall, Bismarck, North Dakota (2017)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bismarck recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Mike Seminary
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2017
Recalls in North Dakota
North Dakota recall laws
Mayoral recalls
Recall reports

An effort in Bismarck, North Dakota, to recall Mayor Mike Seminary from his position was launched in January 2017. Recall organizers submitted petition language to the North Dakota secretary of state for review on January 12, 2017.[1] The petition was approved for circulation on January 19, 2017.[2] Organizers submitted approximately 2,500 signatures to city officials on April 18, 2017.[3] City officials announced that the recall effort fell short of the required signatures on May 18, 2017.[4][5]

Charles Tuttle, a signature gatherer for the recall effort, filed a motion on June 9, 2017, to challenge the city's decision on the recall. The signatures Tuttle gathered for the recall were ruled invalid because of uncertainty about his residency status in the city.[6] The challenge was dismissed without a hearing due to technical errors with Tuttle's motion.[7]

Recall supporters

Better Leadership for a Better Bismarck listed the following reasons for pursuing a recall on its website:

Misplaced public leadership priorities.
It is the opinion of the Sponsoring committee, that the Mayor has repeatedly displayed misplaced leadership priorities. That Mike Seminaries actions, words, and priorities have made The state capitol a poor example of local government.

Ignoring public infrastructure needs to the point of creating a public financing crisis.
March 11th, 2015 the Bismarck Tribune Reported that as traffic in the city has increased, that Washington Street had become more and more of an issue. The concerns could not be met because of a lack of funding, but that the City would be expanding the Civic Center. Postponing a major infrastructure project due to a lack of federal funding, while paving the way for big time developers to get rich with the help of public resources.

Pursuing private benefit policies that reduce tax revenue to the city at the cost of taxpayers.
After a decision to provide $35 million worth of corporate welfare to the FiveSouth project, the Bismarck City Commission now wants to increase the local sales tax by another 1% to provide $17 million a year for road repairs.

Abdicating fiduciary responsibility by allowing city property to be sold at a loss and below market value. Bismarck City Commission agreed to sell the downtown Public Health Building below market value at a loss, but city officials say the purchase was proper.
Seminary said he and city administration staff had talked over the potential sale before the executive session and thought it made sense for the future of Bismarck. He said it is an important project for downtown and for the growth of the community. 'It’s all about the long-term plan,' he said. 'And I’m totally comfortable with the decision we made.'[8][9]

—Better Leadership for a Better Bismarck, (2017)

Recall opponents

Seminary responded to the recall effort during an event on January 26, 2017, arguing that the Bismarck Event Center renovation required no additional public funding following the building's sale. He also said that the city was using economic incentives created by the state legislature to improve infrastructure.[10] On April 20, 2017, Seminary said that he would run to keep his seat if a recall election takes place.[11]

The Bismarck Tribune published the following editorial opposing the recall effort on January 22, 2017:

An effort to recall Bismarck Mayor Mike Seminary seems based on old complaints and targets a mayor with less than 18 months to go in office.

If recall supporters are so unhappy with his performance why did they wait so long to launch their effort? Why try to replace a mayor with so little time left in his term? Whoever wins will have to face voters again in June 2018.

For those reasons alone the Tribune believes the recall isn’t necessary.

Seminary was in his second term as a city commissioner when he ran unchallenged for mayor. He also ran uncontested for his second city commission term. By the time he ran for mayor his positions on the issues were well known. If residents weren’t satisfied with his performance it’s unfortunate they couldn’t find a candidate to challenge him. The Tribune doesn’t question the right to mount a recall, but it would seem a process best used when a grievous act is committed. The criticism of Seminary isn’t new and doesn’t go beyond the ordinary conflicts of serving in office.

'They have issues with misplaced public leadership priorities, ignoring public infrastructure needs to the point of creating a public finance crisis and allowing city property to be sold at a loss and below market value,' Paul Maloney, a spokesman for the recall group, told the Tribune. He cited the below-value sale of the Bismarck Burleigh medical building and the renovation of the then Bismarck Civic Center after the public voted against it as other factors in the recall effort.

Others complained about Seminary welcoming the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters to Bismarck during the powwow week in early September. The mayor later told protesters it was time to go home.

The recall petition has been approved by the secretary of state. Organizers will need to collect about 1,898 signatures to get on the ballot. That’s 25 percent of the number of people who voted in the last mayoral race. They also need at least one challenger on the ballot.

The Tribune urges Seminary’s opponents to rethink the recall. Use the next months preparing a mayoral campaign for 2018. When issues arise where you disagree with the mayor, make yourselves heard at commission meetings. You can make a difference without trying to remove the mayor from office. Why spend money on a special election this year when another election is around the corner?

The Tribune hasn’t always agreed with the mayor and we don’t expect to agree with him all the time in the remaining months of his term. However, we don’t believe his actions merit a recall.[12][9]

The Bismarck Tribune, (2017)

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in North Dakota

Recall supporters needed to gather and submit at least 1,898 signatures from voters living in Bismarck to force a special election. The city administrator's office announced that organizers submitted 1,738 valid signatures and 667 invalid signatures.[1][5]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Mike Seminary Bismarck recall. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes