Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, Question 1, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (November 2006)
Minneapolis Question 1 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Local charter amendments and Local elections and campaigns |
|
Status |
|
Type Referral |
|
Minneapolis Question 1 was on the ballot as a referral in Minneapolis on November 7, 2006. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported adopting ranked-choice voting, also known as instant-runoff voting, for municipal elections. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting ranked-choice voting, also known as instant-runoff voting, for municipal elections. |
Election results
Minneapolis Question 1 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
78,741 | 64.95% | |||
No | 42,493 | 35.05% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Question 1 was as follows:
“ | CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 161 - A PROPOSAL TO USE INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING IN MINNEAPOLIS ELECTIONS Should the City of Minneapolis adopt Single Transferable Vote, sometimes known as Ranked Choice Voting or Instant Runoff Voting, as the method for electing the Mayor, City Council, and members of the Park and Recreation Board, Library Board, and Board of Estimate and Taxation without a separate primary election and with ballot format and rules for counting votes adopted by ordinance? | ” |
Background
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures | |
---|---|
Pages: • Ranked-choice voting (RCV) • History of RCV ballot measures • Electoral systems on the ballot • Local electoral systems on the ballot • Electoral systems by state |
- See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.
Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.
RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.
Local RCV ballot measures
Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.
- Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
- There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
- The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
- The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.
The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.
Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025 | |||||
Topic | Total | Approved | Approved (%) | Defeated | Defeated (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adopt RCV | 72 | 57 | 79.2% | 15 | 20.08% |
Repeal RCV | 8 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 50.0% |
Total | 80 | 61 | 76.3% | 19 | 23.7% |
Path to the ballot
The Minneapolis City Council referred Question 1 to the ballot.
See also
Footnotes
|