Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Minnesota Long-term Care Fund Amendment (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Minnesota Long-term Care Fund Amendment
Flag of Minnesota.png
Election date
November 8, 2016
Topic
Taxes
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature


The Long-term Care Fund Amendment did not appear on a 2016 ballot in Minnesota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment.

The measure would have created a long-term care fund, which would have been funded by closing certain tax loopholes.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot text

The ballot text would have read as follows:[1]

Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to dedicate funding to long-term care for seniors and people with disabilities? This care will be funded by closing a large tax loophole. Currently, the highest income people do not pay any Social Security tax on any of their highest income. Only the highest income people receive this special treatment. Closing this loophole, and treating the highest income people the same as everyone else, will provide the funds necessary to help our most vulnerable citizens.

Yes No[2]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Minnesota Constitution

A simple majority vote in both chambers of the Minnesota State Legislature was required to refer this amendment to the ballot.

State profile

Demographic data for Minnesota
 MinnesotaU.S.
Total population:5,482,435316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):79,6273,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:84.8%73.6%
Black/African American:5.5%12.6%
Asian:4.4%5.1%
Native American:1%0.8%
Pacific Islander:0%0.2%
Two or more:2.7%3%
Hispanic/Latino:5%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:92.4%86.7%
College graduation rate:33.7%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$61,492$53,889
Persons below poverty level:12.2%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Minnesota.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Presidential voting pattern

See also: Presidential voting trends in Minnesota

Minnesota voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.

Pivot Counties (2016)

Ballotpedia identified 206 counties that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016 after voting for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012. Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than 580,000 votes. Of these 206 counties, 19 are located in Minnesota, accounting for 9.22 percent of the total pivot counties.[3]

Pivot Counties (2020)

In 2020, Ballotpedia re-examined the 206 Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. Ballotpedia defined those won by Trump won as Retained Pivot Counties and those won by Joe Biden (D) as Boomerang Pivot Counties. Nationwide, there were 181 Retained Pivot Counties and 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties. Minnesota had 15 Retained Pivot Counties and four Boomerang Pivot Counties, accounting for 8.29 and 16.00 percent of all Retained and Boomerang Pivot Counties, respectively.

More Minnesota coverage on Ballotpedia

See also

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Minnesota Legislature, "HF 2361," accessed December 2, 2015
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  3. The raw data for this study was provided by Dave Leip of Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections.