Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Minnesota judicial elections

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Judges in Minnesota participate in nonpartisan elections in even-numbered years. Judges must run for re-election in nonpartisan elections for subsequent terms.

Minnesota is one of 12 states that uses nonpartisan elections to select judges and does not use retention elections for subsequent terms. To read more about how states use judicial elections to select judges across the country, click here.

Supreme Court Court of Appeals District Court
Nonpartisan election - Six-year terms Nonpartisan election - Six-year terms Nonpartisan election - Six-year terms


The state constitution reads that judges “shall be elected from the area in which they serve.”[1] Under the Minnesota constitution, judges' terms begin and end on the first Monday in January following election.[2]

Elections

Election rules

Primary election

In the nonpartisan primary, the two candidates (for each seat) who receive the greatest number of votes advance to the general election. If no more than two candidates filed to run for each seat, their names do not appear on the primary ballot, but they advance directly to the general election.[3]

Filing period

The filing period for offices contested in the November general election lasts for two weeks from the end of May until the beginning of June. Candidates file with either the county auditor of the county in which they reside or the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State. Candidates must either pay a filing fee or submit a petition in place of the fee.[4]

Reform

Former Governor Al Quie, a Republican, has led a movement to amend the constitution to change the way judges are elected in Minnesota. In 2007, he headed a citizens commission called the Coalition for Impartial Justice that recommended the state scrap the contested elections and switch to a merit-based gubernatorial appointment system, similar to the Missouri Plan. The commission also called for a corresponding judicial performance evaluation commission, something common in states with a Missouri-style system. Under this system, judges would face retention elections, whereby voters would vote whether to retain or remove a judge, and the governor would select any necessary replacements.[5][6]

The Minnesota State Bar Association takes the position that a potential performance evaluation commission should include both lawyers and citizens, appointed by multiple authorities so as to provide checks and balances.[7]

By 2013, the bipartisan idea was losing support with Republican legislators, while still largely popular with Democrats. The issue did not appear on the 2014 ballot.[6][8]

Notes

Until 2002, the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct stated that judges could not seek or accept political endorsements. Judges were also prohibited from soliciting campaign contributions and discussing their views on contested legal or political issues. The U.S. Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled these provisions in violation of the First Amendment.[5]

Voters are informed when a candidate on the ballot is an incumbent.[1]

See also

Minnesota Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Minnesota.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Minnesota
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Minnesota Supreme Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Minnesota
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes