Mississippi Ballot Measure 1, Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A, Medical Marijuana Amendment (2020)
| Mississippi Ballot Measure 1 | |
|---|---|
| Election date November 3, 2020 | |
| Topic Marijuana | |
| Status | |
| Type Constitutional amendment | Origin Citizens |
Mississippi Ballot Measure 1, (Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A) two versions of a medical marijuana amendment, were on the ballot in Mississippi on November 3, 2020. Initiative 65 was an indirect initiated constitutional amendment and Alternative 65 was referred to the ballot alongside Initiative 65 as an alternative measure by the state legislature. Initiative 65 was approved. On May 14, 2021, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that the initiative was invalid because it did not comply with the signature distribution requirements in the Mississippi Constitution. For more information on the lawsuit and invalidation, click here.
Voting "either measure" signified that the voter wanted either Initiative 65 or Alternative 65A to pass, thereby allowing the use of medical marijuana by qualified patients. The voter then needed to proceed to the second question to choose their preferred version. |
Voting "neither measure" (against both) signified that the voter wants neither Initiative 65 nor Alternative 65A to pass. The voter could then proceed to the second question to choose their preferred version in the event the "either" option gets more votes. |
Voters next chose between Initiative 65 or Alternative 65A, regardless of their answer to the first question. Voters who chose "either" in the first question needed to answer the second question for their ballots to be valid. Voters who answered "neither" were able to but did not need to answer the second question for their ballots to be counted.
| Voting for Initiative 65 supported approving the medical marijuana amendment as provided by Initiative 65, which was designed to allow medical marijuana treatment for more than 20 specified qualifying conditions, allow individuals to possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana at one time, and tax marijuana sales at the current state sales tax rate of 7%. |
| Voting for Alternative 65A supported approving the legislature's alternative medical marijuana amendment, which was designed to restrict smoking marijuana to terminally ill patients; require pharmaceutical-grade marijuana products and treatment oversight by licensed physicians, nurses, and pharmacists; and leave tax rates, possession limits, and certain other details to be set by the legislature. |
Since there were more votes for "either" than for "neither" in the first question, the version that received majority approval in the second question—Initiative 65—was enacted since it also received approval from at least 40% of the ballots cast at the election.
Aftermath
2022 medical marijuana bill
After the 2020 medical marijuana initiative and the state's initiative process were invalidated in 2021, the Mississippi State Legislature passed legislation to create a medical marijuana program in 2022. The legislature gave final approval to Senate Bill 2095 on January 26, 2022. The bill was passed in the Senate by a vote of 46-6 and in the House by a vote of 104-13. The governor signed the bill on February 2, 2022, and the bill became effective immediately. Under the bill, a person with a medical marijuana prescription can obtain up to 3.5 grams of marijuana per day. The bill also provided for taxation on the sale and production of marijuana products and provides for conditions under which plants may be grown indoors.[1][2] The text of the 445-page bill can be found here.
City of Madison lawsuit
On October 26, 2020, the City of Madison, Mississippi, filed a lawsuit against Initiative 65 in the Mississippi State Supreme Court asking the court to invalidate the measure and not count any votes cast on it at the November 3 election. The city of Madison and Mayor Mary Hawkins Butler alleged that the Secretary of State unlawfully certified the measure in violation of Section 273 of Article 15 of the Mississippi Constitution. Section 273 states "The signatures of the qualified electors from any congressional district shall not exceed one-fifth ( 1/5 ) of the total number of signatures required to qualify an initiative petition for placement upon the ballot." Oral arguments in the state supreme court were heard on April 14, 2021.[3]
On May 14, 2021, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Ballot Measure 1— (Initiative 65), which was approved by 74% of voters at the 2020 general election— was insufficient because it did not comply with the signature distribution requirements in the Mississippi Constitution and held that any subsequent proceedings regarding the initiative are void.
For more information on the lawsuit filed against the measure by the City of Madison, click here.
Alternate medical marijuana bill (Senate Bill 2765), 2021 (failed)
On February 12, 2021, the Mississippi State Senate passed Senate Bill 2765, which was designed to replace Initiative 65 and take effect if Initiative 65 is ruled unconstitutional by the Mississippi Supreme Court, stemming from litigation filed by the city of Madison. The measure was passed in the Senate but 'was not passed in the House. SB 2765 would have allowed patients to have up to 2.5 ounces of medical cannabis in a 14 day period and would tax marijuana sales at 7%, the same as Initiative 65. SB 2765 also included provisions prohibiting landlords or schools from refusing to house or enroll a person solely for their status as a medical marijuana cardholder. It would also have prohibited a parent from being denied custody or visitation of a child due to their status as a medical marijuana cardholder. The bill would have increased the distance, from 500 feet to 1,500 feet, that a medical marijuana establishment must be from a school, church, or daycare.[4]
State Rep. Joel Bomgar (R), who supported Initiative 65, offered an amended version of SB 2765, which was a copy of Initiative 65 as passed by voters. House minority leader Robert Johnson III said, (D) “I’m interested in seeing [Senate Bill 2765] die — I think it just did die. The people have spoken, with a constitutional amendment about medical marijuana, and that bill went against the spirit of what the people decided.” Jessica Rice, director of the Mississippi Cannabis Trade Association, said, "Our position is that the people have already had an option to vote on a legislatively created program, and they chose not to. Just because this is up before the Supreme Court does not give the Legislature a second bite at the apple … I think this is about control — they want to be able to be in control of the program, but people have already rejected that.”[5]
Special session to address medical marijuana
On September 23, 2021, legislators agreed on a draft bill to establish a medical marijuana program in Mississippi, set to include all qualifying conditions listed in Initiative 65 as well as others, including hepatitis, Alzheimer's, and spastic quadriplegia. Smoking marijuana would be allowed under the draft legislation. Growing marijuana at home would not be allowed under the bill. Legislative leaders requested that the governor call a special session of the legislature, which would begin on October 1, if approved by Governor Tate Reeves (R).[6][7]
Election results
In the first chart below, "yes" vote corresponds to votes for "either" and "no" votes correspond to votes for "neither."
|
Mississippi Ballot Measure 1 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 816,107 | 68.52% | |||
| No | 374,931 | 31.48% | ||
| Mississippi Ballot Measure 1: Initiative 65 or Alternative 65A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 766,478 | 73.7% | |||
| 273,805 | 26.3% | |||
The 766,478 votes cast in favor of Initiative 65 amounted to 57.89% of the votes cast at the election; the measure needed at least 40% to be enacted. There were 281,626 undervotes.
Overview
How did Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A get on the ballot?
- See also: Path to the ballot
The Medical Marijuana 2020 campaign, sponsors of Initiative 65, submitted more than 214,000 signatures—105,686 of which were valid— in September 2019. The initiative was then filed with the state legislature according to Mississippi's indirect initiative process. The legislature had three options: it could (a) choose to adopt the initiative by a majority vote in each house, (b) reject the initiative, or (c) place an alternative measure on the ballot alongside the original initiative. Regardless of whether the legislature adopts or rejects the measure, the proposed amendment proceeds to the ballot.
The Mississippi State Legislature passed House Concurrent Resolution 39 as a legislative alternative to the initiative, which will appear on the ballot as Alternative 65A. The vote was 72-49 in the House on March 10, and 34-17 in the Senate on March 12, 2020.
What was the difference between Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A?
Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A were both designed to amend the Mississippi Constitution to provide for the establishment of a medical marijuana program in Mississippi for individuals with a debilitating medical condition.
Initiative 65 was designed to allow medical marijuana to be recommended for patients with at least one of the 22 specified qualifying conditions including cancer, epilepsy or seizures, Parkinson's disease, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Crohn’s disease, HIV, and more. Patients could have, under Initiative 65, possessed up to 2.5 ounces of medical marijuana at one time. Marijuana sales under Initiative 65 would have been taxed at the state's sales tax rate, which was 7% as of 2020.
Alternative 65A did not specify qualifying conditions, possession limits, or a tax rate. Many details would have needed to be set by the state legislature. Alternative 65A would have restricted the ability to smoke marijuana to terminally ill patients.
The differences between Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A are summarized in the following chart:
| Provision | Initiative 65 | Alternative 65A |
|---|---|---|
| Number of qualifying conditions | 22 specified; more may be established at a later date | none specified |
| Possession limits | 2.5 ounces at once | none specified |
| Ability to smoke marijuana | prohibited in public places[8] | restricted to terminally ill patients |
| Taxes on marijuana sales | taxed at state sales tax rate (7% as of 2020) | no tax rate specified |
| Cost for medical marijuana patient ID cards | capped at $50 | no cost specified |
| Administrating agency | Mississippi Department of Health | not specified |
| Deadline for medical marijuana cards to be issued | August 15, 2021 | no date specified |
What is the status of medical marijuana in the United States?
- See also: Background
As of 2020, 33 states and Washington, D.C., had passed laws legalizing or decriminalizing medical marijuana. Additionally, 13 states had legalized the use of cannabis oil, or cannabidiol (CBD)—one of the non-psychoactive ingredients found in marijuana—for medical purposes.
The federal government has classified marijuana as an illegal controlled substance since 1970. Marijuana is a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). As of 2020, the possession, purchase, and sale of marijuana were illegal under federal law. CBD derived from hemp containing less than 0.3% THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) was legalized at the federal level effective January 1, 2019, after President Donald Trump (R) signed the Agriculture Improvement Act (also known as the Farm Bill) into law on December 20, 2018.[9]
Measure design of Initiative 65
Initiative 65, which was approved in 2020 and overturned by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 2021, was designed to amend the constitution to provide for a medical marijuana program in Mississippi under the direction of the Mississippi Department of Health. Individuals with a debilitating medical condition could have sought certification from a Mississippi-licensed physician to obtain medical marijuana. Marijuana sales would have been taxed, under the initiative, at a rate not to exceed the state's sales tax rate, which was 7% as of 2020. Medical marijuana patient identification cards would have cost up to $50.[10]
Qualifying conditions
The initiative would have defined debilitating medical condition as "cancer, epilepsy or other seizures, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cachexia, post-traumatic stress disorder, positive status for human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, chronic or debilitating pain, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, glaucoma, agitation of dementias, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, sickle-cell anemia, autism with aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, pain refractory to appropriate opioid management, spinal cord disease or severe injury, intractable nausea, severe muscle spasticity, or another medical condition of the same kind or class to those herein enumerated and for which a physician believes the benefits of using medical marijuana would reasonably outweigh potential health risks."[10][11]
Possession limits
The measure would have provided that no qualified patient could possess more than 2.5 ounces of medical marijuana at one time and that no more than 2.5 ounces could be provided to a patient in a 14-day period. The weight limit would not have included ingredients combined with medical marijuana to prepare edible products, topical products, ointments, oils, tinctures, or other products.[10]
Other provisions
Under the measure, no medical marijuana treatment center could have been located within 500 feet of a school, church, or child-care establishment.[10]
Nothing in the measure would have required a physician to issue a certification for a patient to obtain medical marijuana.[10]
The Mississippi Department of Health was charged under Initiative 65 with implementing the provisions of the amendment and issuing rules and regulations for the program by July 1, 2021. The Department would have been required under Initiative 65 to issue identification cards and licenses for treatment center by August 15, 2021.[10]
Measure design of Alternative 65A
Alternative 65A, the state legislature's proposed alternative to Initiative 65, would have amended the constitution to provide for a medical marijuana program in Mississippi. Alternative 65A would have required the medical marijuana program to "be based on sound medical principles" and be designed and run by a state agency using input from health professionals in designing the program. Under Alternative 65A, marijuana products would have needed to be produced by state-licensed manufacturers at a pharmaceutical grade. Under Alternative 65A, marijuana could not be smoked except by those with terminal medical conditions as certified by a healthcare professional. Treatment would have needed to be overseen by licensed physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. The program under Alternative 65A would have had a registry of enrolled patients, a process for patient tracking, and assessment of treatment outcomes.
Text of measure
The image on the right shows how Ballot Measure 1 (Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A) appeared on the ballot and the ordering of the questions voters answer. Below are the ballot titles, ballot summaries, fiscal impact statements, and full constitutional language changes for both Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A.
Ballot question
The ballot questions for Ballot Measure 1 that appeared on the ballot were as follows:
| Initiative 65 |
| |||
| Alternative 65A |
|
Ballot summary
| Initiative 65 |
| |||
| Alternative 65A |
|
Fiscal impact statement
The fiscal impact statements for Ballot Measure 1 that appeared on the ballot were as follows:[13]
| Initiative 65 |
| |||
| Alternative 65A |
|
Constitutional changes
- See also: Mississippi Constitution
The constitutional changes proposed by Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A were as follows.
|
Initiative 65: Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.
|
Alternative 65A: Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.
|
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2020
| Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The Mississippi Attorney General and Mississippi State Legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
|
- Note: the above readability score was calculated using the ballot questions for both Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A.
Support for Initiative 65
Mississippians for Compassionate Care (Medical Marijuana 2020) led the campaign in support of Initiative 65.[14]
Supporters
The Medical Marijuana 2020 campaign provided a full list of endorsements on the campaign’s website, which is available here.
Arguments
- Medical Marijuana 2020 campaign: "Medical marijuana is a safe and effective treatment option for a broad range of serious medical conditions and their symptoms, such as chronic pain. More than 2.8 million Americans are using medical marijuana in 34 states, and there is no reason to deny that same option for relief to Mississippians who are in chronic pain or suffer from other symptoms from debilitating medical conditions."[14]
- Senate candidate Mike Espy (D): "I support Initiative 65 because it provides a well-regulated treatment option to those that need it. Medical marijuana can provide relief for many Mississippians who suffer from nausea during chemotherapy, arthritis, the effects of autoimmune illnesses, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic pain, anxiety, and many other conditions.”[15]
- A group of physicians wrote a letter in support of the initiative addressed to the Mississippi State Board of Health, in which the physicians respond to the board's arguments against the initiative. The physicians wrote, "While medical marijuana is certainly not a cure-all, Mississippians with debilitating medical conditions deserve to have this option available to them. The experiences in 34 other states show that it can be effective, and we believe the benefits of medical marijuana make it a viable treatment option for many in our state who are suffering."[16] The physicians' full statement can be read here.
- Mississippians for Compassionate Care featured a letter signed by ten doctors that said, "We believe that we and other Mississippi doctors should have the ability to certify our patients for medical marijuana as a treatment option. Initiative 65 is the only choice on the November 2020 general election ballot that will create a well-regulated medical marijuana program in Mississippi. [,..] Some politicians have offered a competing ballot measure, Alternative 65A, that purports to also create a medical marijuana program, but, under the purview of politicians, 65A comes up short in every way and will not result in Mississippians obtaining relief.
- The people's INITIATIVE 65 specifically names 22 qualifying medical conditions including cancer, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis. The politicians' Alternative 65A does not name any.
- INITIATIVE 65 provides legal protection for patients, caregivers, and doctors. 65A does not provide any protections.
- INITIATIVE 65 allows caregivers to help the disabled, homebound, and minors with qualifying medical conditions. 65A does not allow caregivers.
- INITIATIVE 65 establishes a framework for how a medical marijuana program will function in a highly regulated and clearly defined environment. 65A does not establish any framework and allows politicians to decide how and when a program will work."[17]
Opposition to Initiative 65
Opponents
Opponents include the following:
- Former Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant (R)[18]
- Mississippi State Board of Health[19][20]
- Mississippi State Medical Association (MSMA)[21]
- American Medical Association (AMA)[21]
- Mississippi Horizon[22]
Arguments
- Mississippi State Department of Health communications director Liz Sharlot: "The Mississippi State Board of Health is not supportive of the legalization of [Initiative 65]. It is not FDA approved, it is illegal, and has not undergone a rigorous medical review. Currently, there are no statutes on the book, so we are watching the events as they unfold."[23]
- The Mississippi State Board of Health passed a resolution stating it is strongly opposed to the initiative. The board argued that the measure would allow "a very broad number of medical indications including such vague reasons as pain management," and that "there would be no ability to restrict the mechanisms of consumption." The board also said the measure "would assign responsibilities to the Mississippi State Department of Health far beyond the scope and mission of the agency, including oversight of agricultural production of marijuana, oversight of marijuana product processing, and tax collection." The board's full statement can be read here.[19]
- Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R): "We need, first of all, something that the (Mississippi) Legislature can control. And if cities and municipalities don’t want that in their communities, they need to have some local control over that, as well. So I do oppose what is on the ballot right now."[24]
- The Mississippi State Medical Association (MSMA) and the American Medical Association (AMA) said, "The measure would require the Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH) to take on the responsibility of a new agriculture program as well as oversee the distribution of a substance that is illegal under federal law. In addition to longstanding concerns about the lack of rigorous medical evidence to support cannabis for medicinal use, the MSMA and AMA agree with state health officials that Initiative 65 would cause immediate harm to the state’s public health mission without any public health benefit."[21]
- Madison County Sheriff Randy Tucker: "Law enforcement is overburdened already. I can promise you, we are pushed to the limit with the manpower, resources and the backing of the law as it is. We are fixed to open pandora's box. ... I’ve been doing this for 30 years and protecting this very community for that number of years, and I have yet to see anybody put one piece of evidence scientifically or medically in my face that says it is a medically approved drug. To call it medical marijuana, medical ice cream, whatever you put the word medical before, it doesn’t necessarily make it medical unless it is truly a medical product."[25]
- Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce Andy Gipson: "The Mississippi State Department of Health already has a huge scope of authority in our lives as we are witnessing every day during the COVID-19 pandemic. Why in the name of anything decent would Mississippians vote to give complete and total control over medical marijuana to the Mississippi Department of Health? Why would we vote to give complete and total control over anything to ANY unelected state agency? ... This Initiative 65 is the exact opposite of what it means to be conservative. If you vote in support of Initiative 65 you are voting to support a state-run and state-controlled marijuana industry. Can you imagine the level of corruption that would result from such an industry in our State?"[26]
Support for Alternative 65A
Arguments
- Mississippi Rep. Trey Lamar (R) said Initiative 65 "is not a simple medical marijuana program. It is designed to flood the market with marijuana that will lead to the state having recreational marijuana." Lamar said Alternative 65A would place more restrictions on marijuana use.[27]
- Mississippi Rep. Jill Ford (R) said, "65A would give people who are in favor of medical marijuana a responsible pathway for accessing it."[25]
- Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce Andy Gipson: "If you want to support the concept, vote against Initiative 65 and vote for the alternative 65A. At least with the alternative 65A you retain a voice through the legislative process and the ballot box. But whatever you do, don’t vote for Initiative 65. Don’t give the Mississippi Department of Health yet another stranglehold over your personal healthcare and freedom. We have enough of that already."[26]
Opposition to Alternative 65A
Arguments
- Mississippi House Democrats said Alternative 65A "is designed to confuse voters by placing a similar initiative on November's ballot to dilute the vote to legalize medical marijuana. ... The sole intention of HCR 39 is to mislead and confuse voters and kill a measure for which the majority of Mississippians are in favor."[28]
- Mississippi Today reported, "Rep. Joel Bomgar (R), who was one of the leaders of the citizen-sponsored initiative effort, told Rep. Trey Lamar (R) that he offered Lamar an opportunity to help craft the language in the initiative, but he refused. Instead, Bomgar said that Lamar authored the alternative in an effort to ensure medical marijuana was not approved on the November ballot. Lamar said that was not true."[27]
- Jamie Grantham of Mississippians for Compassionate Care said Alternative 65A was an "attempt to confuse voters and deny them a fair up or down vote.” Grantham said, “The language of Alternative 65A is inadequate and fails to include basic components necessary to establish a medical marijuana program that will help patients – it does not specify any framework for a functioning medical marijuana program, a timeline for implementation, a specific list of qualifying medical conditions, nor does it even provide constitutional protections for patients, caregivers, or doctors."[25]
Campaign finance
Ballotpedia identified two committee registered to support Initiative 65: Mississippians for Compassionate Care and Mississippians for Compassionate Health Care. According to the most recent available reports, which covered through December 31. 2020, the campaigns raised $7.59 million and spent $7.17 million.[29]
Mississippi Association of REALTORS Political Initiative Committee registered to oppose Initiative 65. The committee reported $314,811 in contributions and $312,311 in expenditures.
| Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support | $7,586,740.59 | $0.00 | $7,586,740.59 | $7,171,585.88 | $7,171,585.88 |
| Oppose | $314,811.00 | $0.00 | $314,811.00 | $312,311.00 | $312,311.00 |
Support for Initiative 65
| Committees in support of Ballot Measure 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
| Mississippians for Compassionate Care | $6,631,326.03 | $0.00 | $6,631,326.03 | $6,216,171.32 | $6,216,171.32 |
| Mississippians for Compassionate Health Care | $955,414.56 | $0.00 | $955,414.56 | $955,414.56 | $955,414.56 |
| Total | $7,586,740.59 | $0.00 | $7,586,740.59 | $7,171,585.88 | $7,171,585.88 |
Top donors
Below are the top donors to the committees that supported Initiative 65:
| Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joel Bomgar | $2,150,000.00 | $0.00 | $2,150,000.00 |
| Marijuana Leadership Campaign | $547,500.00 | $0.00 | $547,500.00 |
| Trustmark National Bank | $475,000.00 | $0.00 | $475,000.00 |
| New Approach PAC | $75,000.00 | $0.00 | $75,000.00 |
| 5020 Companies | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
| American Thermal Systems | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
| Americans for Prosperity | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
Opposition to Initiative 65
| Committees in opposition to Ballot Measure 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
| Mississippi Association of REALTORS Political Initiative Committee | $314,811.00 | $0.00 | $314,811.00 | $312,311.00 | $312,311.00 |
| Total | $314,811.00 | $0.00 | $314,811.00 | $312,311.00 | $312,311.00 |
Top donors
Below are the top donors to the committee that opposed Initiative 65:
| Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Association of Realtors | $249,836.00 | $0.00 | $249,836.00 |
| Mississippi Association of Realtors | $62,460.00 | $0.00 | $62,460.00 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Polls
In a May survey of 602 Mississippi voters, respondents were asked whether they would vote yes on either Initiative 65 or Alternative 65A or no on both and were then asked which measure they would prefer. The following chart shows results for the question of which measure would be preferred.[30]
| Mississippi Initiative 65 and Alternative 65A | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poll | Initiative 65 | Alternative 65A | Both | Neither | Don't know | Margin of error | Sample size | ||||||||||||
| FM3 Research poll 5/24/20 - 5/31/20 | 52.0% | 23.0% | 5.0% | 6.0% | 14.0% | +/-4.0 | 602 | ||||||||||||
| Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. | |||||||||||||||||||
Background
Marijuana and CBD policy in Mississippi
As of 2020, Mississippi did not provide for recreational or medical marijuana. The state has a CBD (cannabidiol) program that was established through Harper Grace's Law. Cannabidiol is a non-psychoactive component of marijuana.
CBD derived from hemp containing less than 0.3% THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) was legalized at the federal level effective January 1, 2019, after President Donald Trump (R) signed the Agriculture Improvement Act (also known as the Farm Bill) into law on December 20, 2018.[31]
Mississippi Senate Bill 3056 (2020)
On October 8, 2020, Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves (R) signed into a law a bill amending state statute to remove FDA-approved cannabidiol drugs from Schedule V of Mississippi's drug code. The bill was approved with bipartisan support with all but five members of the state legislature voting in favor of the bill.[32]
Harper Grace's Law
In 2014, the Mississippi State Legislature passed Harper Grace's Law (House Bill 1231). The law authorized prescription CBD oil for those with certain debilitating epileptic conditions. The bill mandated that CBD oil for eligible individuals must be tested by the National Center for Natural Products Research at the University of Mississippi and be dispensed by the Department of Pharmacy Services at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Under the bill, the CBD oil was limited to containing no more than 0.5% THC.[33] In 2017, the legislature passed Senate Bill 2610, which allowed CBD oil to be dispensed by additional pharmacies or laboratories as long as they are "under appropriate federal and state regulatory approvals and registrations."[34][35]
Medical marijuana in the United States
As of May 2021, 36 states and Washington, D.C., had passed laws legalizing or decriminalizing medical marijuana. Additionally, 10 states had legalized the use of cannabis oil, or cannabidiol (CBD)—one of the non-psychoactive ingredients found in marijuana—for medical purposes.[36] In one state—Idaho—medical marijuana was illegal, but the use of a specific brand of FDA-approved CDB, Epidiolex, was legal.[37] Based on 2019 population estimates, 67.5 percent of Americans lived in a jurisdiction with access to medical marijuana.
Unique instances
Idaho: In 2015, the Idaho State Legislature passed a bill legalizing certain types of CBD oil that was later vetoed by Governor Butch Otter (R). In response, Otter issued an executive order allowing children with intractable epilepsy to use Epidiolex in certain circumstances. [38]
South Dakota: In 2019, the South Dakota State Legislature passed a bill amending one section of law by adding Epidiolex to its list of controlled substances. The bill also exempted CBD from the state's definition of marijuana in that section.[39] Elsewhere in state law, CBD was not exempted from the definition of marijuana. This discrepancy led to confusion that left the legal status of CBD in the state unclear for a year.[40]
After the 2019 changes, Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg (R) issued a statement, wherein he argued all forms of CBD oil, apart from Epidiolex, were illegal under state law.[41] Several state's attorneys expressed disagreement with the Attorney General's statements. Aaron McGown and Tom Wollman, state's attorneys for Minnehaha and Lincoln counties, respectively, issued a joint statement where they said the discrepancy left legality open to differing interpretations. Mark Vargo, the Pennington County state's attorney, said his office would not prosecute CBD cases based on his interpretation of the state law.[40]
On March 27, 2020, Gov. Kristi Noem (R) signed House Bill 1008 into law, which legalized industrial hemp and CBD oil in the state.[42]
Federal policy on marijuana
- See also: Federal policy on marijuana, 2017-2018
The federal government has classified marijuana as an illegal controlled substance since 1970. Marijuana is a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, marijuana has "high abuse potential and no approved therapeutic use through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) process for establishing medications."[43]
On January 4, 2018, the Trump administration rescinded the Cole Memorandum, a 2013 policy that deprioritized the enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states where marijuana had been legalized. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said that in deciding which activities to prosecute under federal laws, such as the Controlled Substances Act, "prosecutors should follow the well-established principles that govern all federal prosecutions. ... These principles require federal prosecutors deciding which cases to prosecute to weigh all relevant considerations, including federal law enforcement priorities set by the Attorney General, the seriousness of the crime, the deterrent effect of criminal prosecution, and the cumulative impact of particular crimes on the community."[44][45]
As of 2020, the possession, purchase, and sale of marijuana were illegal under federal law.
Marijuana on the ballot in 2020
State ballot measures
The following is a list of marijuana-related statewide ballot measures that were on the ballot in 2020:
Path to the ballot
The state process
In Mississippi, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated constitutional amendment for the ballot is equal to 12 percent of the total number of votes cast for governor in the last gubernatorial general election immediately preceding the signature deadline—not necessarily the gubernatorial election immediately preceding the targeted election date. Beginning with the day the sponsor receives the ballot title and summary, proponents have one year to circulate petitions and receive certification from the county circuit clerks. Petitions must be submitted to the secretary of state at least 90 days prior to the beginning of the regular session—which begins in the first week of January.
The requirements to get an initiated constitutional amendment certified for the 2020 ballot:
- Signatures: 86,185 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline to submit signatures was October 9, 2019.
Petition sponsors must submit signatures to the appropriate county circuit clerks. There are no mandatory deadlines for this review and sponsors are recommended to coordinate with local clerks to ensure timely certification. Once the circuit clerks have certified the signatures, proponents must file the entire petition with the secretary of state. Sponsors must also pay a $500 fee upon filing.
Once it is determined that proponents of a measure have collected enough signatures, the measure is filed with the Mississippi State Legislature on the first day of the legislative session. The legislature must act on the measure within four months of that date. The legislature may choose to adopt the measure by a majority vote in each house. Whether the legislature adopts or rejects the measure, the proposed amendment proceeds to the ballot. The legislature may also choose to approve an amended alternate version of the measure. In this case, both measures appear on the ballot together (See: Competing initiatives for details).
An initiative must receive a majority of the total votes cast for that particular initiative and must also receive more than 40% of the total votes cast in that election.[46]
Details about Initiative 65
Ashley Durval filed the initiative with the Mississippi Secretary of State's office on July 30, 2018. Proponents reported submitting more than 214,000 signatures on September 5, 2019.[18] The initiative qualified for the ballot after it was found that proponents submitted 105,686 valid signatures. The initiative was filed with the Mississippi State Legislature on January 7, 2020.[47]
Details about Alternative 65A
Initiatives in Mississippi are indirect, meaning they are presented to the legislature once they qualify. The legislature can choose to adopt or reject the initiative, but the initiative will appear on the ballot regardless of which action the legislature takes. The legislature may also choose to approve an amended or alternate version of the initiative. In this case, both the original initiative and the legislative alternative appear on the ballot together.
The Mississippi State Legislature passed House Concurrent Resolution 39, a legislative alternative (Alternative 65A) to the initiative. The vote was 72-49 in the House and 34-17 in the Senate. Vote totals by party are displayed below.
| House Concurrent Resolution 39 vote totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawsuit
City of Madison vs. Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson
| Lawsuit overview | |
| Issue: Whether the measure was placed on the ballot in accordance with the state constitution | |
| Court: Mississippi Supreme Court | |
| Ruling: Ruled in favor of plaintiffs; initiative found invalid | |
| Plaintiff(s): City of Madison, Mississippi; Mayor Mary Hawkins Butler | Defendant(s): Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson |
| Plaintiff argument: Votes on the measure should not be counted because the measure was placed on the ballot in violation of the state constitution | Defendant argument: Plaintiffs could and should have filed the lawsuit much earlier before the measure was certified for the ballot. |
Source: Marijuana Moment
On October 26, 2020, the City of Madison, Mississippi, filed a lawsuit against Initiative 65 in the Mississippi Supreme Court asking the court to invalidate the measure and not count any votes cast on it at the November 3 election. The city of Madison and Mayor Mary Hawkins Butler alleged that the Secretary of State unlawfully certified the measure in violation of Section 273 of Article 15 of the Mississippi Constitution. Section 273 states "The signatures of the qualified electors from any congressional district shall not exceed one-fifth ( 1/5 ) of the total number of signatures required to qualify an initiative petition for placement upon the ballot."
Plaintiffs alleged "Because Mississippi has four congressional districts, it is a mathematical certainty that the number of signatures submitted in support of Initiative Measure No. 65 from at least one of the four congressional districts exceeds 1/5 of the total number required. Twenty percent (20%) from each congressional district equals eighty percent (80%) total; to reach one hundred percent (100%), the number from at least one district must exceed twenty percent (20%). The Mississippi Legislature is aware of this mathematical impossibility ... Despite the Legislature's failure to propose an amendment to the voters, the Secretary of State nonetheless has followed an 'amended' Section 273(3) and has inserted 'the last five-district congressional district plan' into the text of the Constitution.'" Plaintiffs also alleged, "Initiative Measure No. 65 would likely allow any licensed ‘medical marijuana treatment center’ to grow marijuana within residential areas, substantially harming the City’s legitimate interest in conserving the value of property and protecting the health and safety of its citizenry." The complaint further stated, "This action is not about the wisdom of legalizing medical marijuana. It bears repeating that the City of Madison and Mayor Hawkins Butler are not opposed to a well-regulated medical marijuana program for the truly suffering. What the City and the Mayor oppose is the failure of the Legislature to amend Section 273(3) and the failure of the Secretary of State to follow the plain language of the Constitution. A constitutional amendment must be enacted constitutionally."[49]
Mississippians for Compassionate Care Communications Director Jamie Grantham said "The secretary of state properly qualified Initiative 65 under the same constitutional procedures used for every other successful voter initiative. The lawsuit from the City of Madison is meritless. This is simply a last-ditch effort by political and bureaucratic opponents to deny relief to patients with 22 specific debilitating medical conditions."[49]
The American Medical Association (AMA), Mississippi State Medical Association (MSMA), and the Mississippi Department of Health filed amicus briefs supporting plaintiffs in this lawsuit. Americans for Prosperity of Mississippi and Initiative 65 sponsor Ashley Durval filed an amicus brief supporting defendants in the lawsuit, arguing that overturning Initiative 65 would deprive citizens of using the state's initiative process.[50][51][52]
State attorneys filed arguments on December 28, 2020, arguing that legislators never updated state laws to reflect four congressional districts instead of five and that "As a result, four congressional districts exist in Mississippi under a federal injunction for congressional elections, but five congressional districts exist under state law and may be used for anything but congressional elections." In 2009, the Mississippi attorney general’s office issued a legal opinion stating that initiative sponsors need to collect signatures from the five congressional districts used in the 1990s.[53]
Oral arguments in the state supreme court were set for April 14, 2021.[54]
On May 14, 2021, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the initiative was insufficient because it did not comply with the signature distribution requirements in the Mississippi Constitution and held that any subsequent proceedings regarding the initiative are void. The six justices wrote, "We hold that the petition submitted to the Secretary of State seeking to place Initiative 65 on the ballot for the November 3, 2020, general election was insufficient. Because Initiative 65 was placed on the ballot without meeting the section 273(3) prerequisites for doing so, it was placed on the ballot in violation of the Mississippi Constitution. Whether with intent, by oversight, or for some other reason, the drafters of section 273(3) wrote a ballot initiative process that cannot work in a world where Mississippi has fewer than five representatives in Congress. To work in today’s reality, it will need amending—something that lies beyond the power of the Supreme Court."[55]
Ken Newburger, Executive Director for the Mississippi Medical Marijuana Association, said, "Patients will now continue the suffering that so many Mississippians voted to end. The Court ignored existing case law and prior decisions. Their reasoning ignores the intent of the constitution and takes away people’s constitutional right. It’s a sad day for Mississippi when the Supreme Court communicates to a vast majority of the voters that their vote doesn’t matter."[56]
State Rep. Trey Lamar (R) said, "The language of Initiative 65 that would have gone into our constitution was not good for the people of Mississippi. I thank our Supreme Court for having the courage to rule according to the law and for protecting our citizens from the unintended consequences of Initiative 65. Now, we should craft a legitimate medical marijuana program that will truly help the people who would benefit from it without all of the unintended consequences that would have come with 65."[57]
On July 1, 2021, the Mississippi Supreme Court dismissed a motion to rehear the case filed by sponsors of proposed 2022 initiatives.[58]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Mississippi
Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Mississippi.
| How to cast a vote in Mississippi | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll timesAll polling places in Mississippi are open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Central Time. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[59] Registration requirementsTo register in Mississippi, prospective voters must be United States citizens, residents of their county in Mississippi for at least 30 days, and at least 18 years old by Election Day.[60][61] Registration applications must be submitted by mail or in person to the local circuit clerk’s office at least 30 days before an election. Mailed applications must be postmarked by this date.[61] Automatic registrationMississippi does not practice automatic voter registration. Online registration
Mississippi does not permit online voter registration. Same-day registrationMississippi does not allow same-day voter registration. Residency requirementsTo register to vote in Mississippi, you must be a resident of the state for at least 30 days.[61] Verification of citizenshipProspective voters registering for the first time must provide either their Mississippi driver’s license number or social security number. If neither is available, they must submit "a copy of a current and valid photo ID or a copy of a current utility bill, bank
statement, government check, paycheck or other government document" showing their current address in order to verify their residency.Cite error: Closing Absentee voting
The following types of Mississippi voters are eligible to vote by absentee/mail-in ballot:[62][59]
There is no specific deadline for applying for an absentee ballot. However, voters are encouraged to contact their local circuit or municipal clerk’s office to request an absentee ballot within 45 days of the election. Completed ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received within five business days of the election in order to be counted.[59][62] Returning absentee ballotsCompleted ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received within five business days of the election in order to be counted.[62] On Wednesday, March 22, 2023, Governor Tate Reeves (R) signed Senate Bill 2358 into law, making it a crime to collect and submit mail-in ballots on behalf of others. The law prohibits anyone other than an election official, postal officer, family member, household member, caregiver or commercial carrier from submitting a ballot on behalf of another individual. The effective date of SB 2358 is July 1.[63] Signature requirements and cure provisionsMississippi does not have a cure provision, or a law providing for a process where election officials follow up with voters about certain issues with signatures on their absentee ballots.[59] Was your absentee ballot counted?As of April 2023, Mississippi did not have a statewide mail ballot tracking system. Voter identification requirements
Mississippi requires voters to present photo identification while voting.[64] The following list of accepted ID was current as of April 2023. Click here for the Mississippi Secertary of State page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.[65]
Voters can obtain a Mississippi Voter Identification Card for free at any circuit clerk’s office in Mississippi. Voters can apply for a card during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Voters who need transportation to a circuit clerk’s office can call the secretary of state’s voter ID toll-free hotline at 1-844-678-6837, visit www.MSVoterID.ms.gov, or email MSVoterID@sos.ms.gov to schedule a ride. Transportation is free of charge.[66] BackgroundA 2011 voter ID amendment to the state constitution required an implementing statute and faced United States Department of Justice (DOJ) pre-clearance before it could take effect. In October 2012, the DOJ requested additional information about the law. Mississippi voters, therefore, did not have to show proof of identification to vote in the November 2012 general election. In January 2013, proposed administrative rules for the voter photo identification law were submitted to the DOJ for approval. These rules included a provision allowing for voters who lack an acceptable photo ID to obtain a free voter photo ID card by presenting the same identification materials accepted when a person registers to vote. Once the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, federal pre-clearance was no longer required. As a result, the voter ID law took full effect. As of May 2023, 35 states enforced (or were scheduled to begin enforcing) voter identification requirements. A total of 23 states required voters to present photo identification at the polls; the remainder accepted other forms of identification. Valid forms of identification differ by state. Commonly accepted forms of ID include driver's licenses, state-issued identification cards, and military identification cards.[67][68] Provisional balloting for voters without IDA voter who does not have an acceptable form of identification can cast a provisional ballot, also known as an affidavit ballot. For this ballot to be counted, the voter must either provide the proper ID, apply for a Mississippi Voter ID Card, or submit a religious exemption form within five business days after the election.[59] Mississippi voters are required to present photo identification in order to vote in person. Accepted forms include a driver's license, U.S. passport, or photo ID issued by a branch or department of the state. Voters can obtain a Mississippi Voter Identification Card for free at any circuit clerk’s office in the state.[66] Provisional ballot rulesVoters in Mississippi are given affidavit ballots, or ballots requiring additional steps or information before they can be counted, under the following circumstances.[59][69] (1) If the voter is unable to provide a valid form of photo identification, the voter has the right to cast an affidavit ballot.
(2) If the voter is not registered to vote because he or she "may have been illegally denied registration," the voter has the right to cast an affidavit ballot. (3) If the voter’s name does not appear in the poll book, the voter has the right to cast an affidavit ballot. (4) If the voter has recently moved to a new address, the voter has the right to cast an affidavit ballot. (5) If the voter does not "qualify under state of federal law to cast a regular election Day Ballot," the voter has the right to cast an affidavit ballot. For the affidavit ballot to be counted, the voter must either provide the proper ID, apply for a Mississippi Voter ID Card, or submit a religious exemption form within five business days after the election.[66] Was your provisional ballot counted?A provisional ballot is rejected in the following circumstances:[70]
At least 10 days after the election, the voter can contact the party executive committee (in primary elections, the election commission (in general and special elections), or the circuit clerk to find out if his or her affidavit ballot was counted. Local election officials
Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
Here's the solution: Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker. Ballotpedia's Election Administration Tracker sets the industry standard for ease of use, flexibility, and raw power. But that's just the beginning of what it can do:
The Ballot Bulletin
Recent issuesClick below to view recent issues of The Ballot Bulletin.
SubscribeEnter your email address below to subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin.
Primary election type
A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. Mississippi state law stipulates that an individual can only participate in a party's primary if he or she "intends to support the nominations made in the primary" in which he or she participates. However, this is generally considered an unenforceable requirement. Consequently, Mississippi's primary is effectively open.[71][72][73][74] For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article. Time off work for votingBallotpedia did not find a law specifying whether voters must be given time off from work to vote in this state. Nolo.com notes that states without such state laws may have administrative regulations or local ordinances pertaining to time off for voting and suggests calling your local board of elections or state labor department for more information.[75] If you know of a relevant policy in this state, please email us. As of 2020, 28 states had laws requiring employers to provide time off for voting under certain conditions. Voting rules for people convicted of a felony
In Mississippi, people convicted of one of the following felony offenses are permanently disqualified from voting, Article 12, Section 241 of the state's constitution: murder, rape, bribery, theft, arson, obtaining money or goods under false pretense, perjury, forgery, embezzlement or bigamy. People convicted of other felony offenses automatically regain their voting rights upon completion of their sentence.[59] People convicted of disqualifying felonies must individually request to regain their voting rights and either receive a pardon from the governor or receive a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of the Mississippi legislature, as specified by Article 12, Section 253 of the state's constitution]. Voting rights for people convicted of a felony vary from state to state. In the majority of states, people convicted of a felony cannot vote while they are incarcerated but may regain the right to vote upon release from prison or at some point thereafter.[76] Voter list maintenanceAll states have rules under which they maintain voter rolls—or, check and remove certain names from their lists of registered voters. Most states are subject to the parameters set by The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).[77] The NVRA requires states to make efforts to remove deceased individuals and individuals who have become ineligible due to a change of address. It prohibits removing registrants from voter lists within 90 days of a federal election due to change of address unless a registrant has requested to be removed, or from removing people from voter lists solely because they have not voted. The NVRA says that states may remove names from their registration lists under certain other circumstances and that their methods for removing names must be uniform and nondiscriminatory.[78] When names can be removed from the voter listMississippi law authorizes election officials to remove the names of voters from the registered voting list if an individual:[79]
Inactive voter list rulesIf election officials, using National Change of Address data and other address and voter verification resources, determine that a voter has moved outside of their voting jurisdiction, they are to send the voter a confirmation card and change their registration status to inactive. If the voter does not return the card and fails to vote in the next two federal general elections, they are to be removed from the voter rolls.[79] The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC)According to its website, ERIC is a nonprofit corporation that is governed by a board of member-states. These member states submit voter registration and motor vehicle registration information to ERIC. ERIC uses this information, as well as Social Security death records, to provide member states with detailed reports showing voters who have moved within their state, moved out of their state, died, have duplicate registrations in their state, or are potentially eligible to vote but are not yet registered. ERIC's website describes its funding as follows: "Each state pays annual dues, which are determined by a formula approved by the ERIC membership. The formula includes a state's citizen voting age population as a factor."[80] As of April 2023, Mississippi was one of the 24 states not participatingin the ERIC program. Post-election auditingMississippi state law does not require post-election audits.[81] Post-election audits check that election results tallied by a state's voting system match results from paper records, such as paper ballots filled out by voters or the paper records produced by electronic voting machines. According to the Election Assistance Commission, 40 states required some form of post-election audit as of May 2023.[76][82] Typically, audits are done by recounting a portion of ballots, either electronically or by hand, and comparing the results to those produced by the state's voting system. Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia require this type of traditional post-election audit: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Three additional states require risk-limiting post-election audits, which use statistical methods to compare a random sample of votes cast to election results instead of reviewing every ballot: Colorado, Rhode Island, and Virginia. Two other states require procedural post-election audits, which review the entire election process, including vote totals, ballot chain of custody, and election worker training: Michigan and South Carolina.[76][82] Election administration agenciesElection agencies
Individuals seeking additional information about voting provisions in Mississippi can contact the following local, state, and federal agencies. Mississippi County Election Officials Mississippi Secretary of State
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Election policy ballot measuresBallotpedia has tracked the following ballot measures relating to election and campaign policy in Mississippi.
Election policy legislationThe following is a list of recent election bills that have been introduced in or passed by the Mississippi State Legislature. To learn more about each of these bills, click the bill title. This information is provided by BillTrack50 and LegiScan. Note: Due to the nature of the sorting process used to generate this list, some results may not be relevant to the topic. If no bills are displayed below, no legislation pertaining to this topic has been introduced in the legislature recently.
Ballotpedia's election coverage
See also
Elections in Mississippi
External linksFootnotes
Voter ID requirementsMississippi requires voters to present photo identification while voting.[1] The following list of accepted ID was current as of April 2023. Click here for the Mississippi Secertary of State page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.[2]
Voters can obtain a Mississippi Voter Identification Card for free at any circuit clerk’s office in Mississippi. Voters can apply for a card during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Voters who need transportation to a circuit clerk’s office can call the secretary of state’s voter ID toll-free hotline at 1-844-678-6837, visit www.MSVoterID.ms.gov, or email MSVoterID@sos.ms.gov to schedule a ride. Transportation is free of charge.[3] | |||||||||
See also
External links
- Mississippi Supreme Court 2021 ruling on Initiative 65
- Initiative #65 full text
- House Concurrent Resolution 39
- 2020 Ballot Initiative Information
- 2020 Ballot Initiative Brochure
- 2020 General Election Sample Ballot
Initiative 65 support |
OppositionSubmit links to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Footnotes
| ||||||||||||||
State of Mississippi Jackson (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2023 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |












